Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage to die on sure-enough _FORTIFY_SOURCE overflows

2010-09-28 Thread Petteri Räty
On 09/28/2010 12:43 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: So if you want to have your say, gentoo-qa is there for that. You should not cross post like this. Following the recent discussion the only list allowing cross posting is gentoo-dev-announce. Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage to die on sure-enough _FORTIFY_SOURCE overflows

2010-09-28 Thread Alec Warner
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:43 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, since the last time I asked Zac about this it came back to bite me[1] this time I'm going to send the announce to the list first, and if nobody can actually come up with a good reason not to, I'm going to

Re: [gentoo-qa] Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage to die on sure-enough _FORTIFY_SOURCE overflows

2010-09-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday, September 28, 2010 15:33:10 Alec Warner wrote: On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:43 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: since the last time I asked Zac about this it came back to bite me[1] this time I'm going to send the announce to the list first, and if nobody can actually come up with a

Re: [gentoo-qa] Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage to die on sure-enough _FORTIFY_SOURCE overflows

2010-09-28 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno mar, 28/09/2010 alle 12.33 -0700, Alec Warner ha scritto: Its not clear to me what your purpose is. It is likely that many developers will be unable to do 1. Does that concern you? Should developers ask QA for help on packages? Fixing the package is the solution, it's usually