On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 07:08:44PM +0200, Paweee Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 6/4/10 5:11 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
What do you think about doing the following change in
/usr/portage/profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults:
The following change has now landed in CVS:
I'd suggest a
On 06/10/2010 07:28 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 07:08:44PM +0200, Paweee Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 6/4/10 5:11 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
What do you think about doing the following change in
/usr/portage/profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults:
The following change has
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 07:36:51PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 06/10/2010 07:28 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 07:08:44PM +0200, Paweee Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 6/4/10 5:11 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
What do you think about doing the following change in
On 6/4/10 5:11 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
What do you think about doing the following change in
/usr/portage/profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults:
The following change has now landed in CVS:
Index: targets/developer/make.defaults
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
What do you think about doing the following change in
/usr/portage/profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults:
replace test with test-fail-continue to make it just less
frustrating (we still have a lot of test
On 6/4/10 5:35 PM, Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) wrote:
I've been thinking about this for a while. Some packages have tests
that are meant only for upstream in certain conditions
and are not meant to be ran during installing.
I think that in extreme cases src_test should not call such tests.
As
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:11:45 +0200
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
What do you think about doing the following change in
/usr/portage/profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults:
[..]
What do you think?
I've never felt any need or obligation to use a developer profile. I
don't
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 18:48:38 +0200
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
[1] I've seen developers complain more and more about failing test
suites. Maybe that's a related issue? Developers now use the
FEATURES set out in a developer profile and can then extract some
kind of validity claim from
