Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [e]udev , and please let's move this to a better location (was: Summary Council meeting: Tuesday 11 December 2012)

2012-12-14 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 04:09:34PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
 On 14/12/12 03:02 PM, Greg KH wrote:
  I'm guessing that the result of the council meeting meant that
  things are progressing, right?  If so, in what way?
 
 Sounds like you should join us in #gentoo-udev to discuss, or join the
 eudev mailing list.  I'd rather not spend a significant amount of time
 writing about eudev development on gentoo-dev@ given it's not really
 on-topic here.

It was discussed at the Gentoo Council meeting, how could that _not_ be
on topic here?

greg k-h



Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [e]udev , and please let's move this to a better location

2012-12-14 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 14/12/12 06:24 PM, Greg KH wrote:
 On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 04:09:34PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
 On 14/12/12 03:02 PM, Greg KH wrote:
 I'm guessing that the result of the council meeting meant that 
 things are progressing, right?  If so, in what way?
 
 Sounds like you should join us in #gentoo-udev to discuss, or
 join the eudev mailing list.  I'd rather not spend a significant
 amount of time writing about eudev development on gentoo-dev@
 given it's not really on-topic here.
 
 It was discussed at the Gentoo Council meeting, how could that
 _not_ be on topic here?
 
 greg k-h
 

Not really, no -- what was discussed at the Council meeting was more
or less verbatum what was said in the summary -- Chainsaw reported
that eudev was progressing, had entered the tree, and that he was
confident that it will fulfill the needs of a udev package in Gentoo
that will support separate-/usr without an initramfs.

Any further details of eudev's implementation and/or development were
not discussed at the meeting and are not something that I believe
Council cares about in any particular way either.  (in fact, the
conversation rather quickly turned to a discussion on the role of
gen_usr_ldscript() rather than anything udev/eudev related)

So, everyone, for more discussion about eudev development, please join
the shiny new eudev mailing list; we'll be happy to get into all the
nitty gritty details there and spare all the dev's that don't care
from having to filter it out of their inboxes.


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREIAAYFAlDL2okACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAuyAD/esvQcRiUWBeaO8jHyAOvWBp9
yt/2xghT+VGjbpKJmOQA/jpIIoRuCe87k28nvJj1iVSwVALhq9n5dvER3NReR/C/
=8p5A
-END PGP SIGNATURE-