-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 14/12/12 06:24 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 04:09:34PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >> On 14/12/12 03:02 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>> I'm guessing that the result of the council meeting meant that >>> things are progressing, right? If so, in what way? >> >> Sounds like you should join us in #gentoo-udev to discuss, or >> join the eudev mailing list. I'd rather not spend a significant >> amount of time writing about eudev development on gentoo-dev@ >> given it's not really on-topic here. > > It was discussed at the Gentoo Council meeting, how could that > _not_ be on topic here? > > greg k-h >
Not really, no -- what was discussed at the Council meeting was more or less verbatum what was said in the summary -- Chainsaw reported that eudev was progressing, had entered the tree, and that he was confident that it will fulfill the needs of a udev package in Gentoo that will support separate-/usr without an initramfs. Any further details of eudev's implementation and/or development were not discussed at the meeting and are not something that I believe Council cares about in any particular way either. (in fact, the conversation rather quickly turned to a discussion on the role of gen_usr_ldscript() rather than anything udev/eudev related) So, everyone, for more discussion about eudev development, please join the shiny new eudev mailing list; we'll be happy to get into all the nitty gritty details there and spare all the dev's that don't care from having to filter it out of their inboxes. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlDL2okACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAuyAD/esvQcRiUWBeaO8jHyAOvWBp9 yt/2xghT+VGjbpKJmOQA/jpIIoRuCe87k28nvJj1iVSwVALhq9n5dvER3NReR/C/ =8p5A -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
