Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-11-01 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 10:34:21 + (UTC) Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Well, then, perhaps the developer handbook and devmanual versions make sense to you: Stop throwing the book at me, please. jer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-10-30 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 09:44:42 +0400 Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org wrote: Also speaking about this specific package: I've maintained this package quite long time and I'm following upstream mailing list and I've never heard from upstream it's safe to push betas on all users. I didn't push it on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-10-29 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:12:38 +0400 Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org wrote: В Птн, 29/10/2010 в 06:03 +, Jeroen Roovers (jer) пишет: jer 10/10/29 06:03:08 Modified: ChangeLog Added:tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild Log: Beta version bump, fixes

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-10-29 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:12:38 +0400 Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org wrote: Please, hard mask beta versions. I personally don't see a reason why he needed to do that. If a particular package was a popular one and/or the beta version changed a lot which might imply a lot of users getting trouble due

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-10-29 Thread William Hubbs
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 07:29:07PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote: On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:12:38 +0400 Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org wrote: Please, hard mask beta versions. I personally don't see a reason why he needed to do that. If a particular package was a popular one and/or the beta

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-10-29 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 29/10/2010 в 19:29 +0200, Michał Górny пишет: On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:12:38 +0400 Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org wrote: Please, hard mask beta versions. I personally don't see a reason why he needed to do that. If a particular package was a popular one and/or the beta version changed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-10-29 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 29/10/2010 в 17:51 +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò пишет: Il giorno ven, 29/10/2010 alle 12.12 +0400, Peter Volkov ha scritto: Please, hard mask beta versions. To fix this bug it's not hard to backport patch (patch referenced in bug) and this will give us good version to stabilize.