Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-11-01 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 10:34:21 + (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Well, then, perhaps the developer handbook and devmanual versions > make sense to you: Stop throwing the book at me, please. jer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-10-31 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:11:32 + (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Jeroen Roovers posted on Sat, 30 Oct 2010 19:40:45 +0200 as excerpted: > > > On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 09:44:42 +0400 > > Peter Volkov wrote: > > > >> Also speaking about this specific package: I've maintained this > >> p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-10-30 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 09:44:42 +0400 Peter Volkov wrote: > Also speaking about this specific package: I've maintained this > package quite long time and I'm following upstream mailing list and > I've never heard from upstream it's safe to push betas on all users. I didn't push it on all users. May

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-10-29 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 29/10/2010 в 17:51 +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò пишет: > Il giorno ven, 29/10/2010 alle 12.12 +0400, Peter Volkov ha scritto: > > > > Please, hard mask beta versions. To fix this bug it's not hard to > > backport patch (patch referenced in bug) and this will give us good > > version to stabili

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-10-29 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 29/10/2010 в 19:29 +0200, Michał Górny пишет: > On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:12:38 +0400 > Peter Volkov wrote: > > Please, hard mask beta versions. > > I personally don't see a reason why he needed to do that. > If a particular package was a popular one and/or the beta version > changed a lot w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-10-29 Thread William Hubbs
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 07:29:07PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote: > On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:12:38 +0400 > Peter Volkov wrote: > > > Please, hard mask beta versions. > > I personally don't see a reason why he needed to do that. > If a particular package was a popular one and/or the beta version > ch

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-10-29 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:12:38 +0400 Peter Volkov wrote: > Please, hard mask beta versions. I personally don't see a reason why he needed to do that. If a particular package was a popular one and/or the beta version changed a lot which might imply a lot of users getting trouble due to it, then I w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-10-29 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:12:38 +0400 Peter Volkov wrote: > В Птн, 29/10/2010 в 06:03 +, Jeroen Roovers (jer) пишет: > > jer 10/10/29 06:03:08 > > > > Modified: ChangeLog > > Added:tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild > > Log: > > Beta version bump, fixes buf