Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 Critical News Reporting Round Two

2005-11-21 Thread Mint Shows
This feature should only be used for things that are directly related to the tree, and will cause mass breakage if ignored.I fully agree with this statement. I am behind the adoption of the GLEP only if it does what (I originally believed) was its purpose...to get CRITICAL news regarding package

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 Critical News Reporting Round Two

2005-11-21 Thread Andrew Muraco
Mint Shows wrote: This feature should only be used for things that are directly related to the tree, and will cause mass breakage if ignored. I fully agree with this statement. I am behind the adoption of the GLEP only if it does what (I originally believed) was its purpose...to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 Critical News Reporting Round Two

2005-11-12 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 04:32 -0700, Duncan wrote: I agree to some extent with both viewpoints, here. I think the viewpoint of the portage first side is that we already have the traditional stuff, the announce and dev list, the GWN, the forums, and system changing announcements generally make

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 Critical News Reporting Round Two

2005-11-11 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 11/11/2005-05:48:50(-0700): Duncan types Perhaps $PORTDIR/news, with seen and unseen subdirs (and appropriate no-sync settings on the subdirs) Remember that $PORTDIR can be shared between machines. That's why world is kept in /var/lib/portage. -- \Georgi Georgiev \ Ignorance

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 Critical News Reporting Round Two

2005-11-06 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:38:47 -0700 Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | While I agree with the point you make, I don't believe the apache | upgrade issues were announced on the announce list. The news in the | tree thing is a good idea, IMO, but it'll take some time to | implement. Earth changing

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 Critical News Reporting Round Two

2005-11-06 Thread John Myers
On Sunday 06 November 2005 13:38, Duncan wrote: I don't believe the apache upgrade issues were announced on the announce list. For the record, it was sent to the announce list on 2004-12-24. Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [gentoo-announce] Apache packages refresh on 8th January 2005