El dom, 11-01-2015 a las 08:11 -0500, Rich Freeman escribió:
[...]
The main issue I see is that the main objective of using games.eclass is
to keep games being used by people in games group... but this point if
broken as soon as we allow packages to not use that eclass and, then, I
see no
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
But I must admit I lost the track of this issue some time ago and I
don't remember why the eclass is still allowed and then both policies
are being used in parallel depending on the maintainer, that is the
reason I haven't
El vie, 09-01-2015 a las 23:31 +0100, Michał Górny escribió:
[...]
If I don't misremember Council allowed finally people to not be mandated
by that games team policies and, then, I guess that could finally
allow to drop that security issue no? :/
If it were that simple... but we need to
On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 09:16:36 -0600
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Rich is correct, maintainers are no longer bound by the games team
policy.
I didn't know this. If that's the case, I'd like to proxy-maintain
nethack. I'll try and prepare the neccessary ebuild changes.
Luis Ressel
Dnia 2015-01-08, o godz. 10:45:33
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
El mié, 07-01-2015 a las 19:19 -0500, Jonathan Callen escribió:
[...]
The only reason there is a security issue with nethack (and other
games like it) on Gentoo, and only on Gentoo, is that the games team
policy
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El mié, 07-01-2015 a las 19:19 -0500, Jonathan Callen escribió:
[...]
The only reason there is a security issue with nethack (and other
games like it) on Gentoo, and only on Gentoo, is that the games team
policy requires that
El mié, 07-01-2015 a las 19:19 -0500, Jonathan Callen escribió:
[...]
The only reason there is a security issue with nethack (and other
games like it) on Gentoo, and only on Gentoo, is that the games team
policy requires that all games have permissions 0750, with group
games, and all users
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 05:53:47AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El mié, 07-01-2015 a las 19:19 -0500, Jonathan Callen escribió:
[...]
The only reason there is a security issue with nethack (and other
games like it) on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/07/2015 04:19 PM, Jonathan Callen wrote:
On 01/07/2015 12:15 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 7:57 AM, William Hubbs
willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 06:49:56AM -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
150106 William Hubbs
