On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 9:26 AM Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 17:24 +0200, Joonas Niilola wrote:
> > On 12/4/19 5:21 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> > > On Wed, 04 Dec 2019 13:36:07 +0100
> > > Michał Górny wrote:
> > >
> > > > My point is: gentoo.org as a HOMEPAGE sucks. Please use
On 12/4/19 7:26 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 17:24 +0200, Joonas Niilola wrote:
>> On 12/4/19 5:21 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
>>> On Wed, 04 Dec 2019 13:36:07 +0100
>>> Michał Górny wrote:
>>>
My point is: gentoo.org as a HOMEPAGE sucks. Please use something more
On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 17:24 +0200, Joonas Niilola wrote:
> On 12/4/19 5:21 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> > On Wed, 04 Dec 2019 13:36:07 +0100
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > My point is: gentoo.org as a HOMEPAGE sucks. Please use something more
> > > specific instead. Even link to gitweb would
On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:24:54 +0200
Joonas Niilola wrote:
> I take it you haven't checked the CI results lately? Reaction to that
> probably spawned this ML thread.
In that case, good work :)
pgp3S4GcNB4R5.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 12/4/19 5:21 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Dec 2019 13:36:07 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> My point is: gentoo.org as a HOMEPAGE sucks. Please use something more
>> specific instead. Even link to gitweb would be more helpful because it
>> would at least be relevant to the package
On Wed, 04 Dec 2019 13:36:07 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> My point is: gentoo.org as a HOMEPAGE sucks. Please use something more
> specific instead. Even link to gitweb would be more helpful because it
> would at least be relevant to the package in question.
I agree so much I would support the
On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 13:36 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> My point is: gentoo.org as a HOMEPAGE sucks. Please use something more
> specific instead. Even link to gitweb would be more helpful because it
> would at least be relevant to the package in question.
I've forgot to mention one thing: if
