On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 09:45:25PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mié, 25-03-2015 a las 21:25 +, Robin H. Johnson escribió:
[...]
- timeout:
this is how long you we suggest you wait for the maintainer/team to
comment on your change.
Format should be a short duration specifier per
El vie, 27-03-2015 a las 21:03 +, Robin H. Johnson escribió:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 09:45:25PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mié, 25-03-2015 a las 21:25 +, Robin H. Johnson escribió:
[...]
- timeout:
this is how long you we suggest you wait for the maintainer/team to
On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 22:14:04 +0100
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
I would prefer 1M (well... if the developer is not able to even
comment in bug reports in 1 month, maybe he should have at least a
devaway message explaining how to deal with his/her packages if he is
not able to reply so
El mié, 25-03-2015 a las 21:25 +, Robin H. Johnson escribió:
[...]
- timeout:
this is how long you we suggest you wait for the maintainer/team to
comment on your change.
Format should be a short duration specifier per ISO8601
I'd like to default it to 1 week: 'P1W'.
[...]
I would
On 23.03.2015 18:22, Tim Harder wrote:
With that in mind, I think it would be an interesting experiment if
we had a collaborative herd (probably named collab) that signals
the status that anyone is generally free to fix, bump, or do sane
things to the pkgs with the caveat that you fix what you
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 08:41:52AM +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:22:25 -0400
Tim Harder radher...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hey all,
Having been around for a few years I've inherited or added quite a few
pkgs to the tree that I wouldn't mind other people
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 23/03/15 01:22 PM, Tim Harder wrote:
Hey all,
Having been around for a few years I've inherited or added quite a
few pkgs to the tree that I wouldn't mind other people
fixing/bumping/etc that don't fall into any current herds.
With that
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:22:25 -0400
Tim Harder radher...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hey all,
Having been around for a few years I've inherited or added quite a few
pkgs to the tree that I wouldn't mind other people fixing/bumping/etc
that don't fall into any current herds.
With that in mind, I
Dnia 2015-03-23, o godz. 13:22:25
Tim Harder radher...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
Having been around for a few years I've inherited or added quite a few
pkgs to the tree that I wouldn't mind other people fixing/bumping/etc
that don't fall into any current herds.
With that in mind, I think it
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 22:53:45 +0300
Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 14:49:44 -0400 Tim Harder wrote:
On 2015-03-23 13:48, Panagiotis Christopoulos wrote:
You want to have a herd for that or something in metadata.xml
that would raise a flag that the package
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 14:49:44 -0400 Tim Harder wrote:
On 2015-03-23 13:48, Panagiotis Christopoulos wrote:
You want to have a herd for that or something in metadata.xml that would
raise a
flag that the package can be freely touched/maintained by anyone?
I'd rather have a herd so people
On 13:22 Mon 23 Mar , Tim Harder wrote:
Hey all,
Hi,
...
With that in mind, I think it would be an interesting experiment if we
had a collaborative herd (probably named collab) that signals the
status that anyone is generally free to fix, bump, or do sane things to
the pkgs with the
On 2015-03-23 13:48, Panagiotis Christopoulos wrote:
You want to have a herd for that or something in metadata.xml that would
raise a
flag that the package can be freely touched/maintained by anyone?
I'd rather have a herd so people can easily scan via euscan or similar to see
the entire
On 03/23/2015 01:22 PM, Tim Harder wrote:
Hey all,
Having been around for a few years I've inherited or added quite a few
pkgs to the tree that I wouldn't mind other people fixing/bumping/etc
that don't fall into any current herds.
With that in mind, I think it would be an interesting
On Monday, March 23, 2015 01:22:25 PM Tim Harder wrote:
Hey all,
Having been around for a few years I've inherited or added quite a few
pkgs to the tree that I wouldn't mind other people fixing/bumping/etc
that don't fall into any current herds.
With that in mind, I think it would be an
El lun, 23-03-2015 a las 13:22 -0400, Tim Harder escribió:
Hey all,
Having been around for a few years I've inherited or added quite a few
pkgs to the tree that I wouldn't mind other people fixing/bumping/etc
that don't fall into any current herds.
With that in mind, I think it would be
On 2015-03-23 18:54, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Personally I think a tag in metadata to show that a package can be
touched by others freely would be much more useful than having a big
herd with a mix of packages that are not even related.
Sure, I'd just like to expose this status in a better manner
17 matches
Mail list logo
