Re: [gentoo-dev] net-zope maintenance
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 13:33, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: Arfrever, it would be nice if you could answer these questions. If there's no answer, we should just go ahead and last-rite the entire category. FYI, I discussed this with Arfrever. The python overlay will be retired in favor of a new overlay where Arfrever (and anyone wanting to help out!) can continue to work on both all of the net-zope stuff and probably some python stuff that he is interested in. Cheers, Dirkjan
Re: [gentoo-dev] net-zope maintenance
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 09:23, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: Which Zope team is that? Would that be you? Having an overlay with updated packages certainly sounds good, but it would be nice to have some indication of what we're waiting for, or how long we're waiting. Arfrever, it would be nice if you could answer these questions. If there's no answer, we should just go ahead and last-rite the entire category. BTW, what are the mechanics WRT removing an entire category? Should we keep the category around for the benefit of overlays, or are there mechanisms in place so that overlays can setup their own categories? Cheers, Dirkjan
Re: [gentoo-dev] net-zope maintenance
On 08/29/11 13:33, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 09:23, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: Which Zope team is that? Would that be you? Having an overlay with updated packages certainly sounds good, but it would be nice to have some indication of what we're waiting for, or how long we're waiting. Arfrever, it would be nice if you could answer these questions. If there's no answer, we should just go ahead and last-rite the entire category. BTW, what are the mechanics WRT removing an entire category? Should we keep the category around for the benefit of overlays, or are there mechanisms in place so that overlays can setup their own categories? Overlays can easily define their own categories if needed, so pruning the whole directory should not be a problem. Only profiles/categories might need to be adapted.
Re: [gentoo-dev] net-zope maintenance
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 00:50:40 +0200 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com wrote: 2011-08-13 12:37:00 Dirkjan Ochtman napisał(a): we should just cut it from the portage tree. I suggest to wait until Zope team decides which overlay will be used to host updated, improved and actively maintained ebuilds. The comment in package.mask should describe transition from gentoo-x86 to overlay. Considering tupone's decision and radek's retirement, there's no Zope team anymore. I'll just mask it for removal in a reasonable amount of time and let it die in fire. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] net-zope maintenance
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 00:50, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com wrote: I suggest to wait until Zope team decides which overlay will be used to host updated, improved and actively maintained ebuilds. The comment in package.mask should describe transition from gentoo-x86 to overlay. Which Zope team is that? Would that be you? Having an overlay with updated packages certainly sounds good, but it would be nice to have some indication of what we're waiting for, or how long we're waiting. Cheers, Dirkjan
Re: [gentoo-dev] net-zope maintenance
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:37:00PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: And there are 3 open security bugs from 2011 with vulnerabilities in Zope and/or Plone. So unless someone steps up to takes a serious whack at all of this stuff, perhaps we should just cut it from the portage tree. Ugh :-(. Many years (5+) ago I was part of the Zope folk for a while. I think some of my old Zope deploys from then are still happily running with their new owners. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee Infrastructure Lead E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
Re: [gentoo-dev] net-zope maintenance
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi there, media-libs/FusionSound for whatever reason blocks net-zope/zodb probably file collisions. IIRC i've been hit by that long time ago. There should be also a bug about it. Cheers, Dirkjan -- Fabio Erculiani
Re: [gentoo-dev] net-zope maintenance
2011-08-13 12:37:00 Dirkjan Ochtman napisał(a): we should just cut it from the portage tree. I suggest to wait until Zope team decides which overlay will be used to host updated, improved and actively maintained ebuilds. The comment in package.mask should describe transition from gentoo-x86 to overlay. -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
