Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

On 12/07/2016 07:27 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 07/12/16 05:40 AM, konsolebox wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 16:16:45 +0800 >>> konsolebox wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Michał

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

El mié, 07-12-2016 a las 10:27 -0500, Ian Stakenvicius escribió: > [...] > There is only one instance of a dependency atom that requires the > tinfo flag to be disabled, and that package is an old game whos build > system and ebuild is flawed in this regard.  All others are fine with > the flag

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 10:16:47 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > > Basically you're suggesting to drop either of those modes. Now I'm > > asking, would one of those (likely tinfo mode) be workable in all > > packages? Do you find that it would cause less issues than this > > solution?

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

On 07/12/16 05:40 AM, konsolebox wrote: > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 16:16:45 +0800 >> konsolebox wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 6 Dec 2016

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

El mar, 06-12-2016 a las 22:15 +0100, Michał Górny escribió: > On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:54:26 -0500 > Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:13 AM, konsolebox > > wrote: > > > > > > Please consider promoting the use of tinfo flag in

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 16:16:45 +0800 > konsolebox wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> > On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 20:11:34 -0600 >> > William Hubbs

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 16:16:45 +0800 konsolebox wrote: > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 20:11:34 -0600 > > William Hubbs wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 05:26:19PM -0500, Mike

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 20:11:34 -0600 > William Hubbs wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 05:26:19PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Michał Górny wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 6:26 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > Updating ~1500 ebuilds with a [tinfo=] use-dep seems like a poor solution. If it's the only consistent solution, either you go for it, compromise, or be contented that it's half-broken. I'm not a fan of the latter 2. Or

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

On 12/06/2016 06:44 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 9:11 PM, William Hubbs wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 05:26:19PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:54:26

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 20:11:34 -0600 William Hubbs wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 05:26:19PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:54:26 -0500 > > > Mike Gilbert

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 9:11 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 05:26:19PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> > On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:54:26 -0500 >> > Mike Gilbert wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 05:26:19PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:54:26 -0500 > > Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:13 AM, konsolebox

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:54:26 -0500 > Mike Gilbert wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:13 AM, konsolebox wrote: >> > Please consider promoting the use of tinfo flag in packages that

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:54:26 -0500 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:13 AM, konsolebox wrote: > > Please consider promoting the use of tinfo flag in packages that > > depend on sys-libs/ncurses so that they would synchronize properly > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 2:17 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:05 PM, konsolebox wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:54 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:13 AM, konsolebox

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:05 PM, konsolebox wrote: > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:54 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:13 AM, konsolebox wrote: >>> Please consider promoting the use of tinfo flag in packages that >>>

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:54 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:13 AM, konsolebox wrote: >> Please consider promoting the use of tinfo flag in packages that >> depend on sys-libs/ncurses so that they would synchronize properly >> with

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:12 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 05/12/16 06:13 AM, konsolebox wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Please consider promoting the use of tinfo flag in packages that >> depend on sys-libs/ncurses so that they would synchronize properly >> with sys-libs/ncurses[tinfo].

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:13 AM, konsolebox wrote: > Please consider promoting the use of tinfo flag in packages that > depend on sys-libs/ncurses so that they would synchronize properly > with sys-libs/ncurses[tinfo]. I would rather see the tinfo USE flag removed from

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

On 05/12/16 06:13 AM, konsolebox wrote: > Hi, > > Please consider promoting the use of tinfo flag in packages that > depend on sys-libs/ncurses so that they would synchronize properly > with sys-libs/ncurses[tinfo]. > > It could be as simple as: > > IUSE="tinfo" > >