unsubscribe
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
unsubscribe
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
I got it too! You think the entire list got it???
Sent via BlackBerry by ATT
-Original Message-
From: Zhicheng Wei [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 23:15:55
To:gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] Illegal IMail List Server Command!
me too.
2008
-performance@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] Illegal IMail List Server Command!
me too.
2008/6/5, Kyle Lutze [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Justin wrote:
Florian Philipp schrieb:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 04:40:33 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (List Server) wrote:
Am I the only one who gets a lot
On Thursday 05 June 2008 08:42:19 am Daniel Svensson wrote:
unsubscribe
NO!
--
From the Desk of: Jerome D. McBride
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
by ATT
-Original Message-
From: Zhicheng Wei [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 23:15:55
To:gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] Illegal IMail List Server Command!
me too.
2008/6/5, Kyle Lutze [EMAIL PROTECTED
unsubscribe
--
Ethan Boyle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
unsubscribe
--
Ethan Boyle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
I tried to unsubscribe a couple of times but I still keep getting mail.
How do I unsubscribe?
--
Ethan Boyle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
2008/6/5 Ethan Boyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I tried to unsubscribe a couple of times but I still keep getting mail. How
do I unsubscribe?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Follow the instructions on the mailing list page.
http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/lists.xml
Ethan Boyle wrote:
I tried to unsubscribe a couple of times but I still keep getting mail.
How do I unsubscribe?
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
this. I hope you all are able to resolve this
soon.
--
Ethan Boyle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
. Is this an accurate
representation of all the users of this mailing list? :P
They can't read because they're going to _fast_!!!
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
2008/6/5 Dusan Mulac [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
why are they even still unsubscribing? didnt those mail-bombs stop coming?
or is it just my spam filter filtering duplicate messages?
I put a stop to them earlier after someone notified Infrastructure.
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
care to search it's
docs for how to do this. I hope you all are able to resolve this soon.
Great attitude. I hope you... sell... I'll send some bad Karma your way...
--
From the Desk of: Jerome D. McBride
--
gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
unsubscribe
Am Freitag 08 Juni 2007 07:35 schrieb Daniel Armyr:
Well, I suppose that's part of the problem. What does O3 improve?
I cannot speak for the -03 from gcc specifically, but most
optimizations tend to increase the processes within the CPU. Further,
for them to help, the compiler tends to need
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 11:26:54AM +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
In other words, there is no clear answer but my chances are quiet bad.
I think I'll try around a bit. I'll prepare three images on my desktop, one
Os, one O2 and one O3.
Then I'll post my experience...
Just from personal
Hi guys!
I know, it must be boring to hear that question again and again and again but
I would really appreciate it if you could share some of your experience and
insight with me.
I'm planning to set up a gentoo laptop. It's got only 512MB RAM DDR2-667 and
the slowest of all Core Solo CPUs
Now I'm wondering if a more frequent use of O3 might be a good idea
because of that much cache or if it would just fill up my RAM.
Which application is it you will run that you feel will need those
extra few percent in performance that the optimizations can give you?
--DA
signature.asc
Francisco Rivas
Linux User (New) : #448324
Linux Machine (New) : 355187
Am Freitag 11 Mai 2007 16:13 schrieb Cory Grunden:
Some things that I believe help with startup time are:
-Os and LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -Wl,--as-needed
In order to use the new --hash-styles, you need at
Hi all,
Reading your post i am feel interested in increase my laptop performance but
I don't know by where start, can someone tell me?
Thank you so much in advance and regards
On 5/11/07, Cory Grunden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
deer, list!
I currently try to minimize the application
Quoting lnxg33k:
It seems I'm still on this list. Although it's low traffic, some
interesting stuff comes across. I don't have anything useful to add, but
I'd be interested in following the progress of your group. If the
information is going to be made public or if you are starting a forum
deer, list!
I currently try to minimize the application startup-time for my gentoo-laptop.
Even with prelink it takes about one minute to start kde and all programs in
autostart due to the heavy disk i/o load.
In the last days I did some tests with taking a copy of my regular /usr (ext3)
dir
Hi..
Your experience Daniel it is so good, I the company what I work have the
SunFire V440 with CentOS and It is so bad, so bad, actually one of the most
important problamens what we have is :
One day the company page can not be accessed from anywahere, including the
same company, and the
portage over nfs is much
slower than searching local portage tree...
--
gentoo-performance@gentoo.org mailing list
other parts of gentoo/linux. and is raid0+reiserfs just
begging for trouble?
--
gentoo-performance@gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-performance@gentoo.org mailing list
Unsubscribe
--yourfavoratebattleaxe
--
gentoo-performance@gentoo.org mailing list
Çäđŕâńňâóéňĺ, Pierrick.
Âű ďčńŕëč 23 ˙íâŕđ˙ 2006 ă., 23:41:40:
prymitive wrote:
Wiadomość Oryginalna
Od: Roman Gaufman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do: gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org
Data: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:57:28 +
Temat: Re: [gentoo-performance] How to get Maximum performance
How to get Maximum performance in Graphics on Nvidia Drivers
--
gentoo-performance@gentoo.org mailing list
/virus/
--
gentoo-performance@gentoo.org mailing list
The one thing that first pops to my head is some hdparm results I've had
and if maybe it's either my kernel setup or how I'm testing with hdparm...
Anyhow..
Raptors on SATA (Model Number: WDC WD360GD-00FNA0) (-c3 -u1 -A1
-W1 -d1 -a256 -M254 -m16 -X70 )
Kernel config
I had no idea I even subscribed to this list, now I have to create a new label :oOn 1/19/06, Александр Болотов
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- -Kenneth Sundby-http://kennethism.org
?
--
gentoo-performance@gentoo.org mailing list
unsubscribe
begin:vcard
fn:Geisel Sierote
n:Sierote;Geisel
org;quoted-printable:4up Solu=C3=A7=C3=B5es Corporativas
adr;quoted-printable:Bairro Centro;;Rua Pso. Cal=C3=A7ad=C3=A3o Osvaldo Cruz, 54 sl. 301;Novo Hamburgo;RS;93510015;Brasil
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Diretor
/66sulgJ5fNdVubJYNdPwsY2dNJ5MC7wbxSwIT46TD
88tYAgco4cH9o4whwL2KZIjCQodKgvNwCnvW3qeXOdD/WqRSvuVbFIZh/+YZMHXi
KVnWrePS2kwukMiL28oB9fwsJomQpwxCJlhZxuLto7kM1vBhlKLOeFfoZ8gm6mrF
gBkDwiyV7aNHL4tFgAGtvDPReQhRS4DcN61EVEOYxMxQIKh1lDSFR1UW+j538S9c
J/7XGJI9CxQ=
=Qike
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
gentoo-performance@gentoo.org mailing
it sound more reasonable. I'll have to watch my
rsync output a bit more closely. Thanks again for the explanation.
--
gentoo-performance@gentoo.org mailing list
to look at
RSYNC_EXCLUDEFORM. Cuts down on what is checked during rsync. I assume that
this could also cut down on the cache update time since there would be less to
check? Also cuts down on the amount of space eaten up by portage.
--
gentoo-performance@gentoo.org mailing list
lnxg33k wrote:
Although not exactly what you're asking, you might want to look at
RSYNC_EXCLUDEFORM. Cuts down on what is checked during rsync. I assume
that this could also cut down on the cache update time since there
would be less to check? Also cuts down on the amount of space eaten up
101 - 141 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
