Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] eapply: Drop -s option for patch.

2019-12-14 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 8:12 AM Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 3:41 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 17:15 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 4:42 PM Michał Górny wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 16:37 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > >

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] eapply: Drop -s option for patch.

2019-12-14 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 3:41 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 17:15 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 4:42 PM Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 16:37 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 3:36 PM Michał Górny wrote: > > > >

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] eapply: Output verbosely only if patch fails to apply with -F0

2019-12-14 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sat, 14 Dec 2019, Michał Górny wrote: > Actually, I added that because of your comment that people should be > rebasing patches rather than removing context. Isn't rebasing easier than removing context, anyway? I'd trust the maintainer to do the right thing there. The main argument is t

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] eapply: Output verbosely only if patch fails to apply with -F0

2019-12-14 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 23:49 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 13 Dec 2019, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > > It also triggers pointless bug reports. Please remove this. > > > > > > I don't like that eqawarn either (see above). > > > > > > OTOH, users shouldn't normally have "qa" in PORTA

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] eapply: Drop -s option for patch.

2019-12-14 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 17:15 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 4:42 PM Michał Górny wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 16:37 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 3:36 PM Michał Górny wrote: > > > > Just like 'many of the proposals lately', developers are going