Am 18.06.2010 11:20, schrieb Fabian Groffen:
That said, if you design C APIs, please design them from a C point of
view, initially implemented by your Python functionality doing the
necessary wrapping to get a sane C structure. Then they can be replaced
by native C code as RSI and time
Ok guys :)
I think it has been consensus, that we need to define the operations
everyone wants to be in the API.
The following is currently only my point of view, but I'll represent it
here also:
Then a python-API is created which should allow for this set of
operations. From this one could go
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) schrieb:
Why is a custom set less convenient?
Well, instead of emerge --trialware package you would first have to edit
your
@trialware set and then emerge @trialware. The same goes for when you want
to
remove some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan schrieb:
Patrick Börjesson psychoti...@lavabit.com posted
20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Fri, 29 May 2009
22:17:41 +0200:
Why exactly would you want to use --oneshot for a leaf package that is
not depended on by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ferris McCormick schrieb:
It looks different, if spam is installed and I try to install bacon
additionally:
# emerge -1av bacon
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Börjesson schrieb:
# emerge -1av bacon
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild UD] app-test/eggs-1 [2] 0 kB [1]
[ebuild N] app-test/bacon-1 0 kB [1]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
(The following is done with portage-2.2_rc33)
I created some small test-packages for the following usecase:
Package spam rdepends on =eggs-2.
Package bacon rdepends on =eggs-1.
So in theory there should be no way of installing them together
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Harring schrieb:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:10:43PM -0800, Alec Warner wrote:
belongs.py has this gem:
q.append(('^' if query[0] == '/' else '/') + re.escape(query) + '$')
Also a python2.6 only feature...
~brian
python-2.5 it is ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey,
has your project resulted in anything? :)
Just curios about perhaps nice portage additions ;)
Regards,
Necoro
Emma Strubell schrieb:
Hi everyone. My name is Emma, and I am completely new to this list. I've
been using Gentoo since 2004,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Emma Strubell schrieb:
2) does anyone really need to search an overlay anyway?
Of course. Take large (semi-)official overlays like sunrise. They can
easily be seen as a second portage tree.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Auty schrieb:
Finally there are overlays, and since these can change outside of an
emerge --sync (as indeed can the main tree), you'll have to reindex
these before each search request, or give the user stale data until they
manually
What's the best way to send patches for the patches ;) ?
For example in
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hawking/portage-2to3/auto/11-portage-2to3-map.patch
- there is the following hunk:
hunk
diff --git a/pym/portage/process.py b/pym/portage/process.py
index f766d30..dc425af 100644
---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan schrieb:
Also, a little monitoring utility that could be run in another terminal
and just list and update all the currently merging packages, and any that
had failed to merge, so I could take a look at them while the system is
still
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I think, this is already somewhere on the agenda of portage (perhaps
with a low priority ;)), but I nevertheless wanted to ask for the
possibility to have as much of emerge's functionality exported in an API
as possible =).
The reason behind
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:41:52 +0300, Ali Polatel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Attached patch adds objects cpv, pv and version to portage.versions. This
is
meant as a thin layer over functions vercmp(), pkgcmp(), pkgsplit() and
catpkgsplit().
Using these objects instead of the mentioned
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi guys,
while looking through portage code, I saw, that portage_dep.strip_empty
also modifies the passed list _in place_:
| l = [0,1,2,3,4]
| strip_empty(l)
[1, 2, 3, 4]
| l
[1, 2, 3, 4]
I don't know if this is wanted behavior - but as it is not
16 matches
Mail list logo
