-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 23:13:20 +0100
Alexander Berntsen alexan...@plaimi.net wrote:
On 27/01/14 23:00, Tom Wijsman wrote:
A first idea from looking at search engine results is through the
menu View and then click Message Source; maybe there's
that are in @system are not complained about by this code:
if format not in system_set_atoms:
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
(settings.get(key), default)
!!! Variable %s contains non-integer value: '%s % (key, ...)
If needed, add a word to key to make the variable name slightly more
meaningful; but avoid the full length if possible. eg. try_mirrors_key
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail
empty, silently use the default.
v = default
Afterwards, you have 'match = _fetch_resume_size_re.match(v)' in both
places, you can again just have this once.
Can the two remaining code blocks just be placed after that?
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail
On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 20:15:57 -0800
W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 02:33:06AM +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 15:24:59 -0800
W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
If it doesn't need to get updated, then it probably already
started out
On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 18:01:23 -0800
W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 02:41:41AM +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
There is some duplicate code here, I think the conditions can be
rewritten in such way that the duplicate code doesn't take place.
Do you want a rewrite
On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 08:43:12 -0800
W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 04:02:02PM +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
I think the idea is that you shouldn't need to refer to an external
resource like the mailing list to understand the idea behind the
patch,
Either someone
;). However, if a consistent syntax already exists, I see no reason
not to use it when it suits your purpose.
We discuss here whether to make it policy to use the same syntax.
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
---
bin/repoman | 8
man/repoman.1 | 3 +++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/bin/repoman b/bin/repoman
index d1542e9..44f3d3d 100755
--- a/bin/repoman
+++ b/bin/repoman
@@ -326,6 +326,7 @@ qahelp = {
SRC_URI.mirror: A uri listed in profiles/thirdpartymirrors is
.
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello
Looking back on the repoman patches from both me and creffett, we
haven't written tests; it's on my plan to still do that, if possible.
This makes me wonder: Should writing tests be a requirement? When?
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:44:15 -0800
Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org
wrote:
---
bin/repoman | 53
+ man/repoman.1
| 4 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
I
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:03:03 +0100
Sebastian Luther sebastianlut...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 16.01.2014 01:07, schrieb Tom Wijsman:
---
bin/repoman | 53
+ man/repoman.1
| 4 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
diff --git a/bin
.
And now we have a bunch of great new volunteers.
Yes, we do.
Sebastian even *told* you specifically how to do this properly.
Where did he?
So please do.
Why?
- --
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
GPG
/syntax/, checks/metadata/ and so on.
I really would love to see repoman refactored, redesigned and/or
rewritten; but it is to soon for me to do this the most wise way, as I
need to understand the code. I plan to do this 2 - 4 weeks from now.
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo
---
bin/repoman | 8
man/repoman.1 | 3 +++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/bin/repoman b/bin/repoman
index 9b703dc..3263ceb 100755
--- a/bin/repoman
+++ b/bin/repoman
@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ qahelp = {
SRC_URI.mirror: A uri listed in profiles/thirdpartymirrors is
).
[PATCH 2/3] Have repoman check that a package directory contains at least
one ebuild (bug #245305).
[PATCH 3/3] Have repoman deprecate G2CONF for the GNOME team. (bug #482084).
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public
the bug RESOLVED, FIXED.
Sounds good.
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
.
+It is encouraged to set the alias field for frequently used bugs.
Yes, but please set it to something specific enough; I'm tired of
searching for a random word and get into one or another old bug.
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public
.
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
subversion tla
+ git-r3,
Thank you very much, that warning gets me every time.
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
respond
there and drop gentoo-dev from CC, thank you very much in advance.
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description
23 matches
Mail list logo
