Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Support PROPERTIES="live".

2019-07-29 Thread Zac Medico
On 7/28/19 9:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 2019-07-28 at 17:21 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 7/26/19 3:45 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> While at it, could you look into making src_unpack() network-sandbox >>> override apply only to ebuilds with PROPERTIES=live? >> >> There could be another

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Support PROPERTIES="live".

2019-07-29 Thread Zac Medico
On 7/29/19 5:39 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Sat, 27 Jul 2019, Michał Górny wrote: > >> While at it, could you look into making src_unpack() network-sandbox >> override apply only to ebuilds with PROPERTIES=live? > > I believe the patch included below would do that. > > Ulrich > > >

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Support PROPERTIES="live".

2019-07-29 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sat, 27 Jul 2019, Michał Górny wrote: > While at it, could you look into making src_unpack() network-sandbox > override apply only to ebuilds with PROPERTIES=live? I believe the patch included below would do that. Ulrich From f4ebd25a04d5eb64504724b711b41141723afcd4 Mon Sep 17

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Support PROPERTIES="live".

2019-07-29 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2019, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 2019-07-28 at 17:21 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: >> There could be another subset of packages that aren't quite "live" but >> they need to fetch something that's immutable which can't be fetched via >> a protocol supported by SRC_URI. Maybe

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Support PROPERTIES="live".

2019-07-28 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 2019-07-28 at 17:21 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: > On 7/26/19 3:45 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > While at it, could you look into making src_unpack() network-sandbox > > override apply only to ebuilds with PROPERTIES=live? > > There could be another subset of packages that aren't quite "live"

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Support PROPERTIES="live".

2019-07-28 Thread Zac Medico
On 7/26/19 3:45 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > While at it, could you look into making src_unpack() network-sandbox > override apply only to ebuilds with PROPERTIES=live? There could be another subset of packages that aren't quite "live" but they need to fetch something that's immutable which can't be

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Support PROPERTIES="live".

2019-07-26 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 2019-07-26 at 10:51 +0200, Ulrich Müller wrote: > Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/233589 > Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller > --- > cnf/sets/portage.conf | 8 +++- > lib/_emerge/EbuildExecuter.py | 4 ++-- > lib/portage/_sets/__init__.py

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Support PROPERTIES="live".

2019-07-26 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2019, Zac Medico wrote: > Looks good. Please merge. Will do, as soon as the live eclasses set PROPERTIES="live". Ulrich signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Support PROPERTIES="live".

2019-07-26 Thread Zac Medico
On 7/26/19 1:51 AM, Ulrich Müller wrote: > Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/233589 > Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller > --- > cnf/sets/portage.conf | 8 +++- > lib/_emerge/EbuildExecuter.py | 4 ++-- > lib/portage/_sets/__init__.py

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Support PROPERTIES="live".

2019-07-26 Thread Ulrich Müller
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/233589 Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller --- cnf/sets/portage.conf | 8 +++- lib/_emerge/EbuildExecuter.py | 4 ++-- lib/portage/_sets/__init__.py | 12 +---