On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 12:58:51PM +0100, Selckin wrote:
On Monday 11 February 2008 12:50:39 Brian Harring wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 09:48:01AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
Well, the idea that devs will have to revbump packages just for RDEPEND
version restrictions so that portage
Hi,
reading comments on bug 209538, I've seen this dangerous thing from Zac:
Once these issues are solved it will be nice if we can rely exclusively
on the dependencies from /var/db/pkg.
Well, the idea that devs will have to revbump packages just for RDEPEND
version restrictions so that
On Monday 11 February 2008 12:50:39 Brian Harring wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 09:48:01AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
Well, the idea that devs will have to revbump packages just for RDEPEND
version restrictions so that portage picks it freaks me :)
Then there's: I do have a tool that
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 09:48:01AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
Hi,
reading comments on bug 209538, I've seen this dangerous thing from Zac:
Once these issues are solved it will be nice if we can rely exclusively
on the dependencies from /var/db/pkg.
Well, the idea that devs will have
