On Thursday 15 December 2005 20:06, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 07:41:22PM -0600, Brian Harring wrote:
>
>
> > Either way, here's the issue, atexit registers work fine across forks,
> > portage.portagexit is registered prior to portage_exec.cleanup, so the
> > main portage pid s
Marcelo Resegue wrote:
> On a related matter, maybe it would be a good idea to change the text in
> make.conf about ACCEPT_KEYWORDS.
>
> # Advanced Masking
> #
> #
> # Gentoo is using a new masking system to allow for easier stability
> testing
> # on packages. KEYWORDS are used
On Thursday 15 December 2005 14:13, Alec Joseph Warner wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:35:07 -0500 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > wrote:
> > | I've been trying to sit in #gentoo more often ( I figured insanity
> > | would be a good excuse for
On a related matter, maybe it would be a good idea to change the text in
make.conf about ACCEPT_KEYWORDS.
# Advanced Masking
#
#
# Gentoo is using a new masking system to allow for easier stability testing
# on packages. KEYWORDS are used in ebuilds to mask and unmask packages
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:35:07 -0500 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | I've been trying to sit in #gentoo more often ( I figured insanity
> | would be a good excuse for my crummy grades ) and I am scared by the
> | fact that people still wal
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:35:07 -0500 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| I've been trying to sit in #gentoo more often ( I figured insanity
| would be a good excuse for my crummy grades ) and I am scared by the
| fact that people still walk in and try using ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~blar"
| to emerge th
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:35:07 -0500
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CC'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] because they like getting mail, and are relevant
> to the discussion :)
Let me try to reply to both too then :)
> Opinions on adding a warning when users have set this in their
> environment?
A
Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Thursday 15 December 2005 13:05, Marius Mauch wrote:
package.keywords isn't better or worse than ACCEPT_KEYWORDS, it's just
different in its behavior.
I disagree. ACCEPT_KEYWORDS is problematic for (new) users, because of its
behaviour.
problematic != worse
*shrug
On Thursday 15 December 2005 13:05, Marius Mauch wrote:
> package.keywords isn't better or worse than ACCEPT_KEYWORDS, it's just
> different in its behavior.
I disagree. ACCEPT_KEYWORDS is problematic for (new) users, because of its
behaviour. On the other hand I'm one of these dumb asses as well,
Alec Warner wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
CC'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] because they like getting mail, and are relevant
to the discussion :)
I've been trying to sit in #gentoo more often ( I figured insanity would
be a good excuse for my crummy grades ) and I am scared by the
Brian Harring wrote:
So... thoughts? I'm not much for making portage depend on tarsync
just for emerge-webrsync improvements, would rather chunk the bugger
out.
How about runtime detection?
Marius
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 07:41:22PM -0600, Brian Harring wrote:
> Either way, here's the issue, atexit registers work fine across forks,
> portage.portagexit is registered prior to portage_exec.cleanup, so the
> main portage pid sits there and waits for the kids to go away on their
> own, then p
resurrecting this thread a bit late, but...
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 07:08:43PM +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
> emerge-webrsync is such a thing I'd rather
> keep inline (should be subject for integration into emerge --sync
> instead),
Agreed, _long term_. Short term, till an actual sync refactoring
Il giorno sab, 03-12-2005 alle 21:23 +0900, Jason Stubbs ha scritto:
> Not really necessary. He has an ebuild that says "=kde-3.4.0* =xorg-x11-6.7*"
> which pulls in kde first which then pulls in "xorg-x11" which portage
> resolves to xorg-x11-6.8 after which portage processes xorg-x11-6.7* to
14 matches
Mail list logo
