On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 14:19:07 -0700
> Zac Medico wrote:
>
>> Fix the _slot_operator_update_probe method to ensure that the
>> atom_not_selected variable is always properly initialized. This
>> problem
Fix the _slot_operator_update_probe method to ensure that the
atom_not_selected variable is always properly initialized. This
problem prevented the method from identifying slot operator rebuild
candidates, leading to dependency conflicts and/or missed updates.
For example, this may have triggered
On czw, 2017-03-16 at 21:29 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Michał Górny wrote:
> > + mysettings["FILESDIR"] = os.path.join(settings["PORTAGE_BUILDDIR"],
> > "files")
>
> I believe that this contradicts current PMS 11.1, which defines
> FILESDIR as follows: "The
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Michał Górny wrote:
> + mysettings["FILESDIR"] = os.path.join(settings["PORTAGE_BUILDDIR"],
> "files")
I believe that this contradicts current PMS 11.1, which defines
FILESDIR as follows: "The full path to the package's files directory,
used for small support
Use a model of fake FILESDIR path to ensure that invalid accesses to
FILESDIR will result in failures rather than being silently allowed by
Portage. This mostly involves accesses in the global scope and pkg_*
phases, although the current model does not cover the latter completely
(i.e. does not
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:43:08 +0200
Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Brian Dolbec
> wrote:
> > That could be pretty hard to do for all messages.
> > Especially messages with embedded data
> >
> > eg: "%s is missing %s
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> That could be pretty hard to do for all messages.
> Especially messages with embedded data
>
> eg: "%s is missing %s required use flag..." % ('sys-apps/foo', 'bar')
For that case we could use:
"%s is missing %s