tvali wrote:
I will consider what you sayd about db app design.
Anyway, i usually try to keep tables more dynamic and look at task at
hand, trying to make tables specially for it. When i tested
normalizing, i got about 60 tables where i had 5 without normalizing.
I'm not a Gentoo dev, but a
Brian Harring wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:30:58PM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:16:14AM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
Brian,
I just want to make sure this is still on your agenda :)
InSVN, and in
Brian Harring wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:16:14AM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
Brian,
I just want to make sure this is still on your agenda :)
InSVN, and in the tree... :)
Great! Thanks :)
I was just wondering: Will I be mentioned anywhere?
- Johannes.
--
gentoo
Brian,
I just want to make sure this is still on your agenda :)
- Johannes.
Brian Harring wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 12:39:06PM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
Brian,
did you have a chance to look at this yet?
Will be integrating the changes sometime this week (spaced it tbh
Great! Thank you :) I'll be watching the GWN closely :)
- Johannes.
Brian Harring wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 12:39:06PM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
Brian,
did you have a chance to look at this yet?
Will be integrating the changes sometime this week (spaced i
Brian,
did you have a chance to look at this yet?
- Johannes.
Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 10:15:00AM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
if [[ -n $PORTAGE_NICENESS ]] && ! [[ -z $WE_ARE_NICED ]]; then
Haven't looked at the p
Brian Harring wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 10:15:00AM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
if [[ -n $PORTAGE_NICENESS ]] && ! [[ -z $WE_ARE_NICED ]]; then
Haven't looked at the patch yet, but a bit of bash fu for ya-
[[ -n $VAR ]] == ! [[ -z $VAR ]]
-z is zero length or
RE_NICED is NOT set...)
Icky re-execing, but is the usual trick...
Seems to work for me.
If these patches should get accepted and I should get credited, please
say "Johannes Fahrenkrug (jfahrenkrug_gmail_com)".
Thank you and I'm looking forward to hearing what you think.
- Johann
Ok, here's the patch for emerge-delta-webrync to use PORTAGE_NICENESS.
Brian, I hope this is what you had in mind.
I didn't alter the emerge-webrsync patch again, I think it's OK the way
I altered it in the last patch I posted,
but I attached it again anyway.
- Johannes.
--- /usr/bin/emerge-del
Brian Harring wrote:
Are you suggesting that I should rather leave this up to you since you
were planning
on changing these things anyway?
Nah, I'm suggesting you do it since I don't have the time right now :)
Brian,
OK, I'll take care of it. I also won't have time until next week.
Brian Harring wrote:
I'd also raid the tarsync call- this is something I was intending on
doing but have't yet.
I don't have a very deep knowledge of all the portage internals.
Are you suggesting that I should rather leave this up to you since you
were planning
on changing these things
Paul Varner wrote:
Instead of hardcoding the nice value, use PORTAGE_NICENESS. Here is how
it is done in revdep-rebuild
# Obey PORTAGE_NICENESS
PORTAGE_NICENESS=$(portageq envvar PORTAGE_NICENESS)
[ ! -z "$PORTAGE_NICENESS" ] && renice $PORTAGE_NICENESS $$ > /dev/null
Good point. Is this
Hi,
I'm new to this list put I have been using Gentoo for several years.
Thank you for all the hard work you put into this beautiful distribution.
Since I'm behind a quite restrictive proxy at work, I have to frequently
use emerge-webrsync.
I looked at the script today and thought that 2 things
13 matches
Mail list logo
