-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Harring wrote:
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 11:01:56AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Saturday 15 April 2006 03:31, Brian Harring wrote:
cache backend selection (failed import == defaults to sys default)
This is incorrect. It displays an error
On Apr 7, 2006, at 5:26 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
We have a new cache format, confcache, parallel fetch, etc... The
bonus
is these features are already mature and relatively old ( a year +
as of
now ).
Reading about confcache i have one question:
When i saw, that this feature exists (in
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 05:15:53PM +0200, Philipp Riegger wrote:
On Apr 7, 2006, at 5:26 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
We have a new cache format, confcache, parallel fetch, etc... The
bonus
is these features are already mature and relatively old ( a year +
as of
now ).
Reading about
Brian Harring wrote:
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 05:15:53PM +0200, Philipp Riegger wrote:
On Apr 7, 2006, at 5:26 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
We have a new cache format, confcache, parallel fetch, etc... The
bonus
is these features are already mature and relatively old ( a year +
as of
now ).
On Saturday 15 April 2006 03:31, Brian Harring wrote:
Sidenote, why is userfetch a feature? That seems like something that
should be userpriv by default to me...
It broke somebody's ftp setup.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92960
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org
s/ftp/nfs/ in the mail that I just sent.
--
Jason Stubbsw
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Saturday 15 April 2006 03:31, Brian Harring wrote:
cache backend selection (failed import == defaults to sys default)
This is incorrect. It displays an error message and quits.
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 11:01:56AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Saturday 15 April 2006 03:31, Brian Harring wrote:
cache backend selection (failed import == defaults to sys default)
This is incorrect. It displays an error message and quits.
Still leaves the other features then (and raises
Zac Medico wrote:
Well, please file a bug then. How are we supposed to fix bugs that we aren't
aware of? :)
With the portage regression test suite, of course. =)
Donnie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 13:13 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
I think the current quality level of the 2.1 branch is good enough to make it
a release candidate. From my perspective, it seems like a waste of
everyone's time to roll a
Zac Medico wrote:
This kind of thing will be less of a problem if we shorten the period of the
release cycle. If we shorted it to 2 months or so, then it won't matter much
when something gets bumped to the next cycle.
Also this isn't exactly news to you all as I sent my intentions
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 21:06 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Friday 07 April 2006 20:54, Ned Ludd wrote:
Handling of the || () in ROOT!=/ via the -K option is not in that
good of shape in 2.1_NXX and can't really be used. Till that's
addressed 2.1(re-ping jason) in my eyes absolutely should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner wrote:
See my problem is that some of the features proposed aren't two month
testing features. Particularly when you rewrite decent portions of the
application you need longer than two months to get decent testing
coverage. Sure Unit
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 14:19 -0400, solar wrote:
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 21:06 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Friday 07 April 2006 20:54, Ned Ludd wrote:
Handling of the || () in ROOT!=/ via the -K option is not in that
good of shape in 2.1_NXX and can't really be used. Till that's
On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 19:11:49 -0700
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The manifest code doesn't have very many use cases so I'd expect that
we would have hit most major problems by now (even with a small
sample). Any necessary changes are likely to be small patches. As
an alternative, we
Sorry, send with wrong address earlier.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon?
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 20:09:06 -0400
From: Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN
16 matches
Mail list logo
