-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Harring wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 06:55:44PM -0500, Paul Varner wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 18:34 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
>>
Updated patch to add a semaphore to control access to the global
portage.config object. Unless a
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 19:00 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 06:55:44PM -0500, Paul Varner wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 18:34 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> > > > Updated patch to add a semaphore to control access to the global
> > > > portage.config object. Unless anyone se
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 06:55:44PM -0500, Paul Varner wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 18:34 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> > > Updated patch to add a semaphore to control access to the global
> > > portage.config object. Unless anyone sees any other issues with this
> > > patch, I will be placing it
On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 08:46 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > Updated patch to add a semaphore to control access to the global
> > portage.config object. Unless anyone sees any other issues with this
> > patch, I will be placing it into gentoolkit.
>
> Is the settingslock created in __init__.py acces
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 18:34 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> > Updated patch to add a semaphore to control access to the global
> > portage.config object. Unless anyone sees any other issues with this
> > patch, I will be placing it into gentoolkit.
> Reason for a semaphore over threading.Lock ?
No r
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 02:37, Paul Varner wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 11:59 -0500, Paul Varner wrote:
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90680
> >
> > Author: Paul Varner
> >
> > The current implementation of gentoolkit creates a portage.config
> > object for every package object
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:37:27PM -0500, Paul Varner wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 11:59 -0500, Paul Varner wrote:
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90680
> >
> > Author: Paul Varner
> >
> > The current implementation of gentoolkit creates a portage.config object
> > for every package
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 11:59 -0500, Paul Varner wrote:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90680
>
> Author: Paul Varner
>
> The current implementation of gentoolkit creates a portage.config object
> for every package object that it creates. While this is the correct
> thing to do from an obj
On Monday 19 September 2005 10:26, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Monday 19 September 2005 17:18, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > I doubt though that the config object should be modified.
>
> The Package object needs to call setcpv() on the config object to get
> at the per-package USE flags after they have be
On Monday 19 September 2005 17:18, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> I doubt though that the config object should be modified.
The Package object needs to call setcpv() on the config object to get at the
per-package USE flags after they have been stacked.
> But if it must in some cases a lazy copy scheme
On Saturday 17 September 2005 02:32, Alec Warner wrote:
> Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > On Saturday 17 September 2005 01:59, Paul Varner wrote:
> >>http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90680
> >>
> >>Author: Paul Varner
> >>
> >>The current implementation of gentoolkit creates a portage.config
> >> obj
On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 08:09 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> I tried doing this once before locally, but found some issue with it.
> Unfortunately, I can't remember what that issue was. If you are calling
> setcpv() for every call to the package object that utilizes the config
> object and no utiliz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Saturday 17 September 2005 01:59, Paul Varner wrote:
>
>>http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90680
>>
>>Author: Paul Varner
>>
>>The current implementation of gentoolkit creates a portage.config object
>>for every package o
On Saturday 17 September 2005 01:59, Paul Varner wrote:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90680
>
> Author: Paul Varner
>
> The current implementation of gentoolkit creates a portage.config object
> for every package object that it creates. While this is the correct
> thing to do from an obj
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90680
Author: Paul Varner
The current implementation of gentoolkit creates a portage.config object
for every package object that it creates. While this is the correct
thing to do from an object-oriented programming point of view, this
implementation consumes
15 matches
Mail list logo
