Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5

2006-02-22 Thread Paul Varner
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 18:35 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: > After you've updated to the new ebuild (with patch), run `sed -i > 's/>>> Emerging/>>> emerge/g' /var/log/emerge.log` and genlop should > work correctly again. > Did all of the above and everything is looking good. Thanks for the quick respo

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5

2006-02-22 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Varner wrote: > On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 20:07 -0500, Alec Warner wrote: >> Your testing is appreciated. > > I'll file a bug for this one, once I investigate further. 'genlop -t' > doesn't get along with it very well. > > # genlop -t screen > * ap

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5

2006-02-22 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Varner wrote: > On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 20:07 -0500, Alec Warner wrote: >> Your testing is appreciated. > > The only thing that I have noted so far is that every emerge command is > printing "**" before it does anything else. For example: > > # em

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5

2006-02-22 Thread Alec Warner
Paul Varner wrote: On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 20:07 -0500, Alec Warner wrote: Your testing is appreciated. I'll file a bug for this one, once I investigate further. 'genlop -t' doesn't get along with it very well. # genlop -t screen * app-misc/screen Thu Dec 15 23:10:28 2005 >>> app-mi

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5

2006-02-22 Thread Paul Varner
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 20:07 -0500, Alec Warner wrote: > Your testing is appreciated. I'll file a bug for this one, once I investigate further. 'genlop -t' doesn't get along with it very well. # genlop -t screen * app-misc/screen Thu Dec 15 23:10:28 2005 >>> app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5

2006-02-22 Thread Paul Varner
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 20:07 -0500, Alec Warner wrote: > Your testing is appreciated. The only thing that I have noted so far is that every emerge command is printing "**" before it does anything else. For example: # emerge -pv portage ** These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Ca

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5

2006-02-22 Thread Rumen Yotov
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 10:32, Zac Medico wrote: > Rumen Yotov wrote: > > On Wednesday 22 February 2006 03:07, Alec Warner wrote: > >> Your testing is appreciated. > >> > >> [1]http://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/overlay/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.1_p > >>re5 .ebuild > > > > Hi, > > The install we

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5

2006-02-22 Thread Brian Harring
upgrade to 0.4.2 ... On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 12:32:19AM -0800, Zac Medico wrote: > updating cache config.cache > configure: creating ./config.status > config.status: creating Makefile > config.status: creating doc/Makefile > config.status: creating doc/stylesheets/fcron-doc.dsl > config.status: cr

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5

2006-02-22 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rumen Yotov wrote: > On Wednesday 22 February 2006 03:07, Alec Warner wrote: >> >> Your testing is appreciated. >> >> [1]http://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/overlay/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.1_pre5 >> .ebuild > Hi, > The install went w/o errors, but there'

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5

2006-02-21 Thread Rumen Yotov
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 03:07, Alec Warner wrote: > Zac Medico has graciously done a pre5 release of the 2.1 tree and placed > it in his dev space and on the mirrors. The ebuild is not currently in > the portage tree, but please feel free to test it prior to it's actual > release. The inten

[gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5

2006-02-21 Thread Alec Warner
Zac Medico has graciously done a pre5 release of the 2.1 tree and placed it in his dev space and on the mirrors. The ebuild is not currently in the portage tree, but please feel free to test it prior to it's actual release. The intent here is to hopefully catch any show stopping bug prior to