Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] tree dependency check

2006-03-30 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Thursday 30 March 2006 11:40, Marius Mauch wrote: On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 08:30:17 +0900 Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 30 March 2006 01:21, Marius Mauch wrote: Marius Mauch schrieb: So after manifest2 is in, I'll revive the other issue that IMO is a requirement

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] tree dependency check

2006-03-29 Thread Marius Mauch
Marius Mauch schrieb: So after manifest2 is in, I'll revive the other issue that IMO is a requirement for 2.1: enforcing dependencies needed to use the tree (see old threads or glep44 for reasoning). A patch for that is available at dev.gentoo.org/~genone/patches/treedeps.diff. Unless somebody

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] tree dependency check

2006-03-29 Thread Brian Harring
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 07:21:15PM +0300, Marius Mauch wrote: Marius Mauch schrieb: So after manifest2 is in, I'll revive the other issue that IMO is a requirement for 2.1: enforcing dependencies needed to use the tree (see old threads or glep44 for reasoning). A patch for that is available

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] tree dependency check

2006-03-29 Thread Brian Harring
On 3/29/06, Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 08:30:17 +0900 Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 30 March 2006 01:21, Marius Mauch wrote: Marius Mauch schrieb: So after manifest2 is in, I'll revive the other issue that IMO is a requirement for

[gentoo-portage-dev] tree dependency check

2006-03-25 Thread Marius Mauch
So after manifest2 is in, I'll revive the other issue that IMO is a requirement for 2.1: enforcing dependencies needed to use the tree (see old threads or glep44 for reasoning). A patch for that is available at dev.gentoo.org/~genone/patches/treedeps.diff. Unless somebody objects I'll add that