Brian Harring wrote:
> I switched over to bzr about 2 months back; svn doesn't allow for
> offline committing, nor does gentoo's vcs allow for anon*... bzr
> natively allows for those capabilities, so that's what I'm using. :)
>
> http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/bzr/saviour
> Is where I'll
Brian Harring wrote:
> If y'all want to mirror it, might I suggest poking marienz for his
> tailorization knowledge? Afaik, he had a bzr->svn push working, or at
> least has investigated it.
From what I've heard, tailor has absolutely no knowledge of branches. So
if you use branches, might want
Brian Harring wrote:
> python -m timeit -s 's="asdf"*400;s+="fdsa.ebuild"' 's.endswith(".ebuild")'
> 100 loops, best of 3: 0.88 usec per loop
> python -m timeit -s 's="asdf"*400;s+="fdsa.ebuild"' 's[-7:] == ".ebuild"'
> 100 loops, best of 3: 0.564 usec per loop
> Use endswith
> oddly, wo
Zac Medico wrote:
> Well, please file a bug then. How are we supposed to fix bugs that we aren't
> aware of? :)
With the portage regression test suite, of course. =)
Donnie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Eldad Zack wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm interested in putting together a gentoo mangement node subsystem to aid
> in
> multi-gentoo administration.
The installer guys have been putting some work into something like this,
might want to ask them about it. Think it ended up being called gimli,
but don'
m h wrote:
OK will do that. Since, I'm not a patching pro, can you suggest a
good way of creating a series of patches that apply on top of each
other? (I'd like to do it the "right" way)
I suggest
dev-util/quilt -- if you like GUIs, try dev-util/gquilt.
Thanks,
Donnie
--
gentoo-portage-dev@g
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> yes, it's a user-friendly interface issue:
> we have *no* *sane* way of doing a debug emerge
I don't find this particular implementation very user-friendly either,
since AFAIK the FEATURES settings still aren't remembered or settable on
a per-package level.
That's why x-mo
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 11 May 2006 02:41, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> yes, it's a user-friendly interface issue:
>>> we have *no* *sane* way of doing a debug emerge
>> I don't find this particular implementation ver
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 11 May 2006 14:23, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Thursday 11 May 2006 02:41, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>>>> That's why x-modular.eclass has USE=debug to accomplish the same thing.
>>> which is tot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't know whether all of you read my blog, but I wanted to make sure
you saw this:
http://www.livejournal.com/users/spyderous/60809.html?thread=89737#t89737.
It's a reply from the author of a book on why he rated our package
management at a 4 inste
10 matches
Mail list logo
