Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Proposal: pre-emerge advisories

2005-07-09 Thread Drake Wyrm
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 08 July 2005 16:40, Craig Lawson wrote: What I'd like to see *before* I upgrade is a list of advisories about what trouble I'm in for. How about the ChangeLog? That would be a great answer. I look for trips and traps by doing an `emerge

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] New emerge --mindeps option for exclusion of build time dependencies (bug #132355)

2006-07-12 Thread Drake Wyrm
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The attached patch for bug #132355 [1] adds a --mindeps option for emerge that effectively allows build time dependencies to be excluded from dependency calculations involving binary and installed packages. With this patch, it's possible to remove all build

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Atom matching behavior

2006-07-31 Thread Drake Wyrm
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 07:42:23PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: Was just brought to my attention that the =* operator doesn't work as I thought, as for example =foo-1.2* matches foo-1.20 as well as foo-1.2.3. snip but I'd suspect that many people share

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Atom matching behavior

2006-07-31 Thread Drake Wyrm
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 04:55:09PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote: Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 07:42:23PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: Was just brought to my attention that the =* operator doesn't work as I thought

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Atom matching behavior

2006-07-31 Thread Drake Wyrm
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 31 July 2006 18:48, Brian Harring wrote: Should be discussed on -dev, not here imo; why ? short term we're gaining functionality: simply add .* Just making sure that I understand you... Given the original example atom of =foo-1.2*, which

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Atom matching behavior

2006-07-31 Thread Drake Wyrm
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 31 July 2006 21:37, Drake Wyrm wrote: Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: short term we're gaining functionality: simply add .* Just making sure that I understand you... Given the original example atom of =foo-1.2*, which currently

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] ebuild/emerge lookup category differently?

2009-07-23 Thread Drake Wyrm
Amit Dor-Shifer ami...@oversi.com wrote: Hi. In my overlay, I can have packages assigned to a private category, and have that category specified in profiles/categories, under the overlay itself. However, in-order to ebuild such a package I have to append the category to