Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] Naming Conventions

2006-07-22 Thread Brian
On Sat, 2006-22-07 at 04:43 +0900, Chris White wrote: This said, the following are recommendations: 1) Create aliases to the new functions, then at some yet-to-be-determined point, kill the aliases and bomb on the scripts (this suffers from procrastination). 2) Make an official release

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] Naming Conventions

2006-07-22 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris White wrote: 1) Create aliases to the new functions, then at some yet-to-be-determined point, kill the aliases and bomb on the scripts (this suffers from procrastination). 2) Make an official release with the new function names and no

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] Naming Conventions

2006-07-22 Thread Brian Harring
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 04:25:01PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: Chris White wrote: 1) Create aliases to the new functions, then at some yet-to-be-determined point, kill the aliases and bomb on the scripts (this suffers from procrastination). 2) Make an official release with the new

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] Naming Conventions

2006-07-22 Thread Marius Mauch
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 16:25:01 -0700 Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris White wrote: 1) Create aliases to the new functions, then at some yet-to-be-determined point, kill the aliases and bomb on the scripts (this suffers from