RE: [gentoo-user] Well, my RAID array is screwed (was df != fdisk )

2003-08-14 Thread Rex Young
> >Agreed. I have three systems right now that are fully RAIDed, one a >high use server, a personal server, and my personal workstation, all of >which use software raid, one of which uses a PCI-IDE card (promise >tx-2000 or something) to add the extra channels that are needed. I use one of Promi

Re: [gentoo-user] Well, my RAID array is screwed (was df != fdisk)

2003-08-14 Thread Eric Livingston
> Note that the TX4 "RAID" card, is essentially a *software* raid card > (i.e. glorified IDE controller). There is very few true IDE raid card > with support under linux. 3ware and ARCO DupliDisk are the only ones. > http://www.linux-ide.org/chipsets.html > > -Ross Do you mean by that that the pdc

[gentoo-user] Well, my RAID array is screwed (was df != fdisk)

2003-08-14 Thread Eric Livingston
It turns out that for some reason mkreiserfs only allocated 60G on my 120G Raid array. I rebooted on my 1.4 LiveCD and attempted to debug_reiserfs my array, but wound up getting a screen full of I/O errors on one of my drives (the first one of the array). I suspect it's not actually the drive, but

Re: [gentoo-user] Well, my RAID array is screwed (was df != fdisk)

2003-08-14 Thread Ross Jordan
> > > Note that the TX4 "RAID" card, is essentially a *software* raid card > > (i.e. glorified IDE controller). There is very few true IDE raid card > > with support under linux. 3ware and ARCO DupliDisk are the only ones. > > http://www.linux-ide.org/chipsets.html > > > > -Ross > > Do you mean b

RE: [gentoo-user] Well, my RAID array is screwed (was df != fdisk)

2003-08-14 Thread Rex Young
>It turns out that for some reason mkreiserfs only allocated >60G on my 120G >Raid array. I rebooted on my 1.4 LiveCD and attempted to >debug_reiserfs my >array, but wound up getting a screen full of I/O errors on one >of my drives >(the first one of the array). I suspect it's not actually the

Re: [gentoo-user] Well, my RAID array is screwed (was df != fdisk)

2003-08-14 Thread Ross Jordan
> My only regret is that I'll no longer be using the RAID card to its full > extent. However, I've also read some interesting opinions that talk about > how a low-end RAID card (such as the tx4) can be a bottleneck on higher-end > systems. Mine's a dual-mp 1.4Ghz (1600+) configuration. Such opinion

Re: [gentoo-user] Well, my RAID array is screwed (was df != fdisk )

2003-08-14 Thread Alan
> I've had good luck with Linux software raid arrays. It's so > durn easy, I don't see any reason to bother with the low end > RAID cards. (The more expensive cards can offer advantages > not otherwise available.) Agreed. I have three systems right now that are fully RAIDed, one a high use serv