Am 2012-02-29 08:23, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
Stefan,
I haven't had problems with upgrading, but I didn't wait this long.
Eg. I didn't migrate from 2.1 to 2.4 directly.
*SIGH* ;-)
I would suggest you check on the cyrus-imap mailing list (see bottom of
email) for tips. Installing it is
On Wed, February 29, 2012 9:10 am, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 2012-02-29 08:23, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
Stefan,
I haven't had problems with upgrading, but I didn't wait this long.
Eg. I didn't migrate from 2.1 to 2.4 directly.
*SIGH* ;-)
I would suggest you check on the cyrus-imap
Am 2012-02-29 09:35, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
On Wed, February 29, 2012 9:10 am, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Sure, yes. I have to research how to do that for hundreds of
mailboxes in one command ...
There is an example for this on the project homepage:
http://imapsync.lamiral.info/ All you
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:38:13 -0600
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
I have a question on this. I have a drive that I use for movies
and such. There is nothing OS related on that drive. Would it be
safe to set this to say 1% or even 0?
I'd say
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:10:05 -0600
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:38:13 -0600, Dale wrote:
tune2fs -m 1 /dev/data/data1
Which is where the ext4 file system is on the LVM. After I run
that then I can expand LVM from there, I hope it
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:25:00 +0100
Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote:
Neil Bothwick writes:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:01:50 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
If you instantly need more space, reduce the amount of reserved
space for the superuser, which is 5% as default:
tune2fs -m 2
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:10:05 -0600, Dale wrote:
tune2fs -m 1 /dev/data/data1
Which is where the ext4 file system is on the LVM. After I run that
then I can expand LVM from there, I hope it works that easy.
It does.
Apparently I am missing something then. I looked at cfdisk for
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:29:45 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
It means there's no single sane default anymore. On my servers I set
reserved space to 100M or so as that's what I need. I reckon the
average person should keep it to somewhat larger than the biggest
single file you expect to store on
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:57:19 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:29:45 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
It means there's no single sane default anymore. On my servers I set
reserved space to 100M or so as that's what I need. I reckon the
average person should
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:40:33 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
When $LUSER fills up his drive it can be that root is the only user
that can properly mount and access the filesystem. So whatever the
$LUSER was doing that filled up the drive needs to be undone by root,
probably by shuffling stuff
Hi,
I'm trying to get WLAN working on my HP625 laptop.
I've checked several web pages but I'm lost.
I'm using a recent kernel (3.3-rc5+).
I configured CONFIG_BRCMUTIL=m CONFIG_BRCMSMAC=m CONFIG_BRCMFMAC=m and
I installed the coresponding firmware in /lib/firmware/brcm
Now, lspci -k shows
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:08:49 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:40:33 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
When $LUSER fills up his drive it can be that root is the only user
that can properly mount and access the filesystem. So whatever the
$LUSER was doing that
On February 29, 2012 at 2:43 AM J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Wed, February 29, 2012 2:01 am, Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
Alex Schuster wrote:
snipped
Also, it is already set up with LVM and
ext4. Can I change it even while there is data on there?
Sure!
Alan McKinnon wrote:
They don't interfere with each other.
LVM and the size of the filesystem is one thing. Reserved space is
something else, completely unrelated.
Ahhh, light bulb moment. Gotcha !!
Dale
:-) :-)
--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you
J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Wed, February 29, 2012 2:01 am, Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
Alex Schuster wrote:
snipped
Also, it is already set up with LVM and
ext4. Can I change it even while there is data on there?
Sure! Cool, isn't it. Just call lvresize -L +1G
Peter Humphrey writes:
On Tuesday 28 February 2012 11:23:40 Alex Schuster wrote:
Peter Humphrey writes:
Now can anyone tell me why clicking the first link in this e-mail
opened it in Konqueror and the second in Firefox?
Because KDE is so weird all over the place.
Well I just hope
On Wednesday 29 Feb 2012 16:27:50 Alex Schuster wrote:
Peter Humphrey writes:
On Tuesday 28 February 2012 11:23:40 Alex Schuster wrote:
Peter Humphrey writes:
Now can anyone tell me why clicking the first link in this e-mail
opened it in Konqueror and the second in Firefox?
On Tuesday 28 February 2012 15:57:36 James Broadhead wrote:
Please don't send html emails to the list
I wrote a test message and saved it, then examined it with less. It was in
two parts: one plain text and one HTML. I have never set an option to write
in HTML so I shut kmail down and checked
On Wednesday 29 Feb 2012 11:28:34 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get WLAN working on my HP625 laptop.
I've checked several web pages but I'm lost.
I'm using a recent kernel (3.3-rc5+).
I configured CONFIG_BRCMUTIL=m CONFIG_BRCMSMAC=m CONFIG_BRCMFMAC=m and
I installed the
Am 29.02.2012 09:35, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
If you want to still try to copy the mail over, you need to look into
converting the *.db files.
Just as a closing(?) feedback here:
people at the cyrus-ml were a great support, I am nearly done with my
conversion.
And, yes, I run (gentoo stable)
On Wednesday 29 Feb 2012 21:08:41 Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday 28 February 2012 15:57:36 James Broadhead wrote:
Please don't send html emails to the list
I wrote a test message and saved it, then examined it with less. It was in
two parts: one plain text and one HTML. I have never set
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 08 Feb 2012 11:33:42 Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
On 08.02.2012 12:02, Michael Mol wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Christopher Kurtis Koeber
ckoe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am trying
I recently bought a new Gradtec PC To TV component because my old Grand
Pro Ultimate XP that I bought in 2004 was on its last legs. We used the
Ultimate XP so that we could use the living room TV as a monitor, so
that we could watch MythTV in the living room. The Ultimate XP was
having a problem
On 02/29/2012 02:40 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
So whatever the
$LUSER was doing that filled up the drive needs to be undone by root,
probably by shuffling stuff around.
That's a shocking statement for a wannabe BOFH to make. A *real* BOFH
would delete the entire $LUSER account and blame the
On Wednesday 29 February 2012 21:28:07 Mick wrote:
On Wednesday 29 Feb 2012 21:08:41 Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday 28 February 2012 15:57:36 James Broadhead wrote:
Please don't send html emails to the list
I wrote a test message and saved it, then examined it with less. It was
in
On Mar 1, 2012 7:02 AM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/29/2012 02:40 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
So whatever the
$LUSER was doing that filled up the drive needs to be undone by root,
probably by shuffling stuff around.
That's a shocking statement for a wannabe BOFH to make. A *real*
On 02/29/12 16:41, Michael Sullivan wrote:
I recently bought a new Gradtec PC To TV component because my old Grand
Pro Ultimate XP that I bought in 2004 was on its last legs. We used the
Ultimate XP so that we could use the living room TV as a monitor, so
that we could watch MythTV in the
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 02:11:41PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I've never failed to fix that by deleting a file as the user that
created it, usually the partial file that caused the problem, but I
can see why you may want to keep a small amount reserved for that.
However, I still don't
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:23:11AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
So, cfdisk is happy with the change but nothing else seems to see it.
What am I missing here? Where did the 50Gbs go to?
Dale
:-) :-)
Nowhere.
Disk manufacturers measure kilos of data as 1000
Everyone else
Wouldn't this particular topic be best answered by the dev's of said file
systems and
what, if any, fragmentation etc, could and can and will happen with the
different
arguments ie -m 0, etc.? All it is now between everyone discussing this here in
a Gentoo
list is more or less conjecture,
John wrote:
Wouldn't this particular topic be best answered by the dev's of said file
systems and
what, if any, fragmentation etc, could and can and will happen with the
different
arguments ie -m 0, etc.? All it is now between everyone discussing this here
in a Gentoo
list is more
31 matches
Mail list logo
