Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
[ huge snip ]
Each time, you've acted as though the new stance is what you've been
arguing from all along, but because you haven't communicated that,
it's impossible to reasonably discuss
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:47:16 -0500, Dale wrote:
I may end up with a init thingy, which I am currently using. Thing is,
the first time it breaks and I can't fix it, I'll install something
else.
That's why I build the initramfs into the kernel and not as a separate
file. If I do something to
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:47:16 -0500, Dale wrote:
I may end up with a init thingy, which I am currently using. Thing is,
the first time it breaks and I can't fix it, I'll install something
else.
That's why I build the initramfs into the kernel and not as a separate
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 05:10:55 -0500, Dale wrote:
That's why I build the initramfs into the kernel and not as a separate
file. If I do something to break the initramfs I just boot the
previous kernel knowing it will still work.
I tried that. It broke. It didn't boot not even once. Google
On 2012-03-14 9:03 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
*YOUR WIFE'S LAPTOP* won't boot properly without /usr on /, or an
initramfs. OK, put /usr on /, or an initramfs*ON YOUR WIFE'S LAPTOP*.
I don't have a problem with that. What gets people really upset is the
dog-in-the-manger
On 2012-03-15 5:13 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
That's why I build the initramfs into the kernel and not as a separate
file. If I do something to break the initramfs I just boot the previous
kernel knowing it will still work.
Ok, time to show my ignorance...
How would I know if
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:41:38 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
That's why I build the initramfs into the kernel and not as a separate
file. If I do something to break the initramfs I just boot the
previous kernel knowing it will still work.
Ok, time to show my ignorance...
How would I know if
On 2012-03-15 9:05 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:41:38 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
That's why I build the initramfs into the kernel and not as a separate
file. If I do something to break the initramfs I just boot the
previous kernel knowing it will still work.
From: Dale [mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com]
This has been one of my points too. I could go out and buy me a bluetooth
mouse/keyboard but I don't because it to complicates matters.
I had a long reply to Walt that I (probably wisely) decided not to send, but
the basic point of it is also relevant
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:56:12 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
Well, you built the kernel, so you should know.
Well, since I basically just used a kernel .config that someone else
originally set up, copying .config over and running make oldconfig when
upgrading over the years, stumbling through
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2012-03-15 9:05 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:41:38 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
That's why I build the initramfs into the kernel and not as a separate
file. If I do something to
On 2012-03-14, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 12 Mar 2012 18:34:37 Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2012-03-12, Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
No, I simply meant that if you use Postfix you don't have to use
anyone else's SMTP server,
If you've got a static IP
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Mike Edenfield kut...@kutulu.org wrote:
From: Dale [mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com]
This has been one of my points too. I could go out and buy me a bluetooth
mouse/keyboard but I don't because it to complicates matters.
I had a long reply to Walt that I
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Grant Edwards
grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-14, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 12 Mar 2012 18:34:37 Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2012-03-12, Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
No, I simply meant that if you use Postfix
Am 15.03.2012 01:41, schrieb Silvio Siefke:
Hello,
my neighbor gave me the notebook. First, I installed Sabayon, as a test.
Now i has installed direct Gentoo and the Xorg.Server. When i run Xorg
-configure and test the config i become error messages.
No Screen found and No devices
On Mar 15, 2012 9:50 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
8 snip
That's really not the reason for it. I mean, sure, I think the initial
reactions were mostly grumpiness and misinformed outrage, but I don't
think the contrariness really *baked* in until people got a twofer of
you're
On 14-Mar-12 19:41, ZHANG, Le wrote:
So my question is: Can I somehow deliberately trigger
kernel panic (or kernel oops)?
For panic, echo c /proc/sysrq-trigger
After I issued the above mentioned command, my system
instantly froze to death. Nothing changed on screen,
no kernel panic
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Jarry mr.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14-Mar-12 19:41, ZHANG, Le wrote:
So my question is: Can I somehow deliberately trigger
kernel panic (or kernel oops)?
For panic, echo c /proc/sysrq-trigger
After I issued the above mentioned command, my system
On Thursday 15 Mar 2012 17:02:15 Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Jarry mr.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14-Mar-12 19:41, ZHANG, Le wrote:
So my question is: Can I somehow deliberately trigger
kernel panic (or kernel oops)?
For panic, echo c /proc/sysrq-trigger
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 15 Mar 2012 17:02:15 Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Jarry mr.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14-Mar-12 19:41, ZHANG, Le wrote:
So my question is: Can I somehow deliberately trigger
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:25:43 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
Is that Ctrl+Alt+SysRq+(R E I S U B), or is the SysRq key not actually
used?
Alt+SysReq+{R E I S U B}
--
Neil Bothwick
Did you know that eskimos have 17 different words for linguist?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 15 Mar 2012 17:02:15 Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Jarry mr.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14-Mar-12 19:41, ZHANG, Le
On Thursday 15 Mar 2012 19:36:16 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 15 Mar 2012 17:02:15 Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Jarry
Just to be sure, r e i s u b may be input in low case, without shift, right?
Like hold Alt + SysRq and type r e i s u b then release Alt + SysRq?
On 15/03/12 21:45, Claudio Roberto França Pereira wrote:
Just to be sure, r e i s u b may be input in low case, without shift, right?
Like hold Alt + SysRq and type r e i s u b then release Alt + SysRq?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_SysRq_key
On Thursday 15 Mar 2012 14:51:10 Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Grant Edwards
grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-14, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps your mail address was blacklisted? Many ISPs IP address
blocks are blacklisted these days.
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 15 Mar 2012 14:51:10 Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Grant Edwards
grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-14, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps your mail address was
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Claudio Roberto França Pereira
spide...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to be sure, r e i s u b may be input in low case, without shift, right?
Like hold Alt + SysRq and type r e i s u b then release Alt + SysRq?
correct! :)
On Thursday 15 Mar 2012 20:07:54 Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you tried using port 587? Comcast should accept relaying on that
port IIRC with your customer username/passwd.
Researched that, but I ultimately didn't go that
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 15 Mar 2012 20:07:54 Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you tried using port 587? Comcast should accept relaying on that
port IIRC with your
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 04:17:14AM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote
Hi, Gentoo.
Yes, I've got Gnome going under mdev. Thanks to Mike Edenfield for the
tip about needing to configure things in xorg.conf.
Here's how I did it:
Great. Is that GNOME version 2 or version 3? I'm working on
Hi; just to let you guys know that my overlay for having a
systemd-only Gentoo machine (no OpenRC, no baselayout, no sysvinit),
it's available, sync'ed with the portage tree of March 11 (it took me
a few days to update all my machines and to check everything was
working OK).
You can grab the
On Mar 16, 2012 7:59 AM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 04:17:14AM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote
Hi, Gentoo.
Yes, I've got Gnome going under mdev. Thanks to Mike Edenfield for the
tip about needing to configure things in xorg.conf.
Here's how I did
On Thursday, March 15, 2012 01:05:12 PM Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:41:38 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
That's why I build the initramfs into the kernel and not as a
separate
file. If I do something to break the initramfs I just boot the
previous kernel knowing it will still
34 matches
Mail list logo
