Re: [gentoo-user] System maintenance procedure?

2012-12-11 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:36:10 -0600 Bruce Hill wrote: > On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 04:48:24PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > > > workstation ~ # emerge -a @preserved-rebuild > > > emerge: 'preserved-rebuild' is an empty set > > > emerge: no targets left after set expansion > > > > So you have no

Re: [gentoo-user] Localmount starts before LVM

2012-12-11 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:46:19 -0500 Randy Barlow wrote: > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:28:37 +0530 > > Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: > >> Exactly the reason why I wanted RAID0 and LVM in combination: more > >> IOPS. ZFS looks very interesting, how stable is it? > > > > On Linux, no

[gentoo-user] Mounting floppy disks

2012-12-11 Thread Paul Hartman
For some reason, when I mount floppy disk (standard HD 3.5" VFAT disk) it does nothing. No error, just nothing... I have not tried this in well over a year, but it used to work. The /dev/fd0 device works normally, I can access it with mtools and use dd and even access disks in virtual machines run

Re: [gentoo-user] crontab questions

2012-12-11 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/11/2012 04:15 PM, Grant wrote: > Is there a way to remove "Cron " from the subject line of > crontab mail without piping each cron job to 'mail'? > > I set 'usermod -c hostname root' on each of my systems so that the From: > line displays "hostname" for crontab mail. This works on each syst

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev: boot failure

2012-12-11 Thread Nilesh Govindrajan
On Wednesday 12 December 2012 08:19 AM, James wrote: > James tampabay.rr.com> writes: > > >> looking into : /mnt/gentoo/new/usr/portage/sys-fs/udev >> I cannot tell what version of udev (udev mount) >> and others (udev-init-scipts ?) were installed >> and how to roll this back. > > OK so on on

Re: [gentoo-user] udev: boot failure

2012-12-11 Thread Nilesh Govindrajan
On Wednesday 12 December 2012 08:07:46 AM IST, James wrote: > > OK so lots of updates (mostly kde 4.9.3) > to several systems today. 2 or the 3 are fine > > One got hosed. Error message upon reboot > > config_devdmpfs=y is required in your kernel configuration > for this version of udev to run succ

[gentoo-user] Re: udev: boot failure

2012-12-11 Thread James
James tampabay.rr.com> writes: > looking into : /mnt/gentoo/new/usr/portage/sys-fs/udev > I cannot tell what version of udev (udev mount) > and others (udev-init-scipts ?) were installed > and how to roll this back. OK so on one of my working systems, I have sys-fs/udev-171-r9 installed. So I

[gentoo-user] udev: boot failure

2012-12-11 Thread James
OK so lots of updates (mostly kde 4.9.3) to several systems today. 2 or the 3 are fine One got hosed. Error message upon reboot config_devdmpfs=y is required in your kernel configuration for this version of udev to run successfully this requires immediate action mdev: sys/class no such file mdev

[gentoo-user] Re: recovery of fstab

2012-12-11 Thread James
Bruce Hill happypenguincomputers.com> writes: > Start by issuing "blkid" to determine what partitions are there. If you use -L > with mkfs. then you should have a label, such as this: > peter ~ # blkid > /dev/sda1: LABEL="root" UUID="73362905-79dc-4512-9518-4c040963f80e" > TYPE="xfs" I used

Re: [gentoo-user] Intel Atom: architecture, distcc, crossdev and compile flags

2012-12-11 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 09:20:55PM +0100, Florian Philipp wrote: > > * From my observations, the benefit of 64 bit over 32 is much smaller for an > > Atom than it is for my Core2. Am I right to assume thus that the Atom > > architecture doesn’t have much to offer to 64 bit (such as extra > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Installing specific layman packages & eix-test-obsolete

2012-12-11 Thread Grant
> > > This is against the idea of an overlay: If you want only cerain > > > packages copy them into your local overlay and do not add the whole > > > overlay to portage. (But you might get troubles if you do not use > > > eclasses or other ebuilds from the overlay which might contain > > > correspo

Re: [gentoo-user] recovery of fstab

2012-12-11 Thread Adam Carter
> mount them and see whats there? > Also, check the partition table to see which one is swap, and what other partitions exist.

Re: [gentoo-user] recovery of fstab

2012-12-11 Thread Bruce Hill
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:48:03PM +, James wrote: > > I guesses but the / is blank? > > df > /dev/sda2 61438696 51276944 10161752 84% /mnt/gentoo/boot > /dev/sda3 61438696 51276944 10161752 84% /mnt/gentoo > > > /mnt/gentoo/boot is populated (mounted correctl

Re: [gentoo-user] recovery of fstab

2012-12-11 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
mount them and see whats there? also, what order did you mount them in? it may make a difference On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:48 PM, James wrote: > Well I have a gentoo system I'm trying to recover. > I've got it booted up via systemrescue. > > I do not have a copy of the fstab, so what is the bes

Re: [gentoo-user] Installing specific layman packages & eix-test-obsolete

2012-12-11 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:32:01 -0800, Grant wrote: > > This is against the idea of an overlay: If you want only cerain > > packages copy them into your local overlay and do not add the whole > > overlay to portage. (But you might get troubles if you do not use > > eclasses or other ebuilds from the

[gentoo-user] recovery of fstab

2012-12-11 Thread James
Well I have a gentoo system I'm trying to recover. I've got it booted up via systemrescue. I do not have a copy of the fstab, so what is the best way to discover which partitions are /boot / and so on? (brain dead tonight) I guesses but the / is blank? df /dev/sda2 61438696 5

Re: [gentoo-user] Installing specific layman packages & eix-test-obsolete

2012-12-11 Thread Grant
>> I think what we really need is a better way >> to install only certain packages from an overlay. > > This is against the idea of an overlay: If you want only cerain packages > copy them into your local overlay and do not add the whole overlay > to portage. (But you might get troubles if you do n

[gentoo-user] crontab questions

2012-12-11 Thread Grant
Is there a way to remove "Cron " from the subject line of crontab mail without piping each cron job to 'mail'? I set 'usermod -c hostname root' on each of my systems so that the From: line displays "hostname" for crontab mail. This works on each system except the mail server itself which still sh

Re: [gentoo-user] Installing specific layman packages & eix-test-obsolete

2012-12-11 Thread Vaeth
I also get 376 matches from "Not installed but in /etc/portage/package.mask" which are surely the packages in my overlays masked by */* but not installed. Do you know the name of this test so I can disable it in eixrc? REDUNDANT_IF_IN_MASK (or in /etc/portage/package.nowarn: in_mask) I thin

Re: [gentoo-user] Intel Atom: architecture, distcc, crossdev and compile flags

2012-12-11 Thread Joseph
I have: Atom(TM) CPU 330 @ 1.60GHz running it with: CFLAGS="-march=core2 -O2 -pipe" CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" MAKEOPTS="-j5" CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" Didn't run any test performance on it, but the only disappointing fact about this small box is that it will not reboot itself when the power goe

Re: [gentoo-user] Intel Atom: architecture, distcc, crossdev and compile flags

2012-12-11 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 11.12.2012 18:36, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger: > Hello list > > Long time no read... :) > > It follows a verbose preamble. For the actual questions see dashed line > below. > TL;DR summary: it’s all about ricer-performance questions on a netbook. > > > I have the luck of having obtained a u

Re: [gentoo-user] Installing specific layman packages & eix-test-obsolete

2012-12-11 Thread Grant
>> > This really freaks out eix-test-obsolete. Does anyone know of a way to >> > install only certain packages from a layman overlay and >> > use eix-test-obsolete? >> >> I don't add such overlays to make conf. Instead, I symlink directories for >> the packages I want into my local overlay. >> > >

Re: [gentoo-user] eix and bad colors.

2012-12-11 Thread Mark Knecht
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Dale wrote: > Howdy, > > I was using eix a bit ago and I noticed the colors have changed. Since > I like to have white text and a black background, this is not working to > well for me. It seems some of the output is black text. Put black text > on a black backgr

Re: [gentoo-user] Installing specific layman packages & eix-test-obsolete

2012-12-11 Thread Grant
>> in package.mask: >> >> */*::init6 >> >> eix-test-obsolete find over 27,000 packages under this heading: >> >> Redundant in /etc/portage/package.mask: >> ... considered as REDUNDANT_IF_MASK_NO_CHANGE > > > The reason for this is the following: > Since the category and package is */*, your mask ca

Re: [gentoo-user] Intel Atom: architecture, distcc, crossdev and compile flags

2012-12-11 Thread Norman Invasion
On 11 December 2012 12:36, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > Hello list . . . > So I’m interested in you opinion and own experience about the following > arising questions: > > * From my observations, the benefit of 64 bit over 32 is much smaller for an > Atom than it is for my Core2. Am I right to a

Re: [gentoo-user] Installing specific layman packages & eix-test-obsolete

2012-12-11 Thread Grant
> > If my package.mask is empty, eix-test-obsolete runs fine. If I have > > this in package.mask: > > > > */*::init6 > > > > eix-test-obsolete find over 27,000 packages under this heading: > > > > Redundant in /etc/portage/package.mask: > > ... considered as REDUNDANT_IF_MASK_NO_CHANGE > > > > Add

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: broadcom-sta and the 3.6.x kernel

2012-12-11 Thread Dustin C. Hatch
On 12/11/2012 03:04, Nuno J. Silva wrote: On 2012-12-07, Mick wrote: This sounds scary!!! Isn't there a way of disabling this feature in the BIOS? With HP, you don't even get a BIOS setup. You get something that tells you the processor temperature and possibly lets you change the boot order.

Re: [gentoo-user] ifconfig and ppp0 address

2012-12-11 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> I can send you the source code if you want. Likewise to any other > interested reader Send to me please, Thanks -- ___ 'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work together. Write programs to hand

[gentoo-user] Re: OT: first water cooled system

2012-12-11 Thread James
Volker Armin Hemmann googlemail.com> writes: > Then use burnp6. Or burnmmx. Same packacke. No winecrap. OK thanks for the input. Thank for all the help. James

[gentoo-user] Intel Atom: architecture, distcc, crossdev and compile flags

2012-12-11 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Hello list Long time no read... :) It follows a verbose preamble. For the actual questions see dashed line below. TL;DR summary: it’s all about ricer-performance questions on a netbook. I have the luck of having obtained a used netbook for free (Atom N450, single- core with HT, 1 GB memory, 54

Re: [gentoo-user] System maintenance procedure?

2012-12-11 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/11/2012 08:36 AM, Bruce Hill wrote: > On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 04:48:24PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote: >> >>> workstation ~ # emerge -a @preserved-rebuild >>> emerge: 'preserved-rebuild' is an empty set >>> emerge: no targets left after set expansion >> >> So you have nothing that needs rebuild

Re: [gentoo-user] Localmount starts before LVM

2012-12-11 Thread Randy Barlow
Alan McKinnon wrote: On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:28:37 +0530 Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: Exactly the reason why I wanted RAID0 and LVM in combination: more IOPS. ZFS looks very interesting, how stable is it? On Linux, not at all (it doesn't exist there except using fuse) On FreeBSD, rock solid. On

Re: [gentoo-user] ifconfig and ppp0 address

2012-12-11 Thread David W Noon
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:33:15 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote about "[gentoo-user] ifconfig and ppp0 address": >For years I have been using ifconfig and some simple shell magic to >extract the ip address from the adsl ppp session when it changes. The >latest update has changed the output format of ifc

[gentoo-user] Re: Localmount starts before LVM [resolved]

2012-12-11 Thread Nilesh Govindrajan
Issue resolved guys. Thanks to J. Roeleveld for pointing out that auto detection is failing. I built an initramfs using genkernel with raid and lvm support and added options domdadm & lvmraid. It works flawlessly now. Thanks! :-) -- Nilesh Govindarajan http://nileshgr.com

Re: [gentoo-user] System maintenance procedure?

2012-12-11 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:36:10 -0600, Bruce Hill wrote: > > So you have nothing that needs rebuilding. Portage will warn you when > > the set is non-empty, telling you to run emerge @preserved-rebuild. > > There is no need to run it at any other time. > > After using Gentoo for close to two years

Re: [gentoo-user] Localmount starts before LVM

2012-12-11 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:28:37 +0530 Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: > > "I have these disks, use 'em. When I've figured out the actual > > quotas and sizes I need, I'll let you know. Meanwhile just get on > > with it and store my stuff in some reasonable fashion, 'mkay? > > kthankxbye! I have real work

Re: [gentoo-user] System maintenance procedure?

2012-12-11 Thread Bruce Hill
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 04:48:24PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > workstation ~ # emerge -a @preserved-rebuild > > emerge: 'preserved-rebuild' is an empty set > > emerge: no targets left after set expansion > > So you have nothing that needs rebuilding. Portage will warn you when the > set it

Re: [gentoo-user] Localmount starts before LVM

2012-12-11 Thread Michael Mol
On Dec 11, 2012 7:57 AM, "Nilesh Govindrajan" wrote: > > On Tuesday 11 December 2012 05:18 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > > > Ouch, auto-detect does not work with metadata 1.2. > > Please read the man-page section: > > === > > --auto-detect > > Request that the kernel starts any auto-detected arr

Re: [gentoo-user] Localmount starts before LVM

2012-12-11 Thread J. Roeleveld
> On Tuesday 11 December 2012 05:18 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: >> >> Ouch, auto-detect does not work with metadata 1.2. >> Please read the man-page section: >> === >> --auto-detect >> Request that the kernel starts any auto-detected arrays. This can >> only >> work if md is compiled into the kerne

Re: [gentoo-user] Localmount starts before LVM

2012-12-11 Thread Nilesh Govindrajan
On Tuesday 11 December 2012 05:57 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:08:12 + > Neil Bothwick wrote: > >> On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:48:13 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote: >> I'm using metadata version 1.2 for the raid0 array and the type is kernel based autodetect. >>> >>> Ou

Re: [gentoo-user] Localmount starts before LVM

2012-12-11 Thread Nilesh Govindrajan
On Tuesday 11 December 2012 05:18 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > Ouch, auto-detect does not work with metadata 1.2. > Please read the man-page section: > === > --auto-detect > Request that the kernel starts any auto-detected arrays. This can only > work if md is compiled into the kernel - not if

Re: [gentoo-user] Localmount starts before LVM

2012-12-11 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:08:12 + Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:48:13 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > > > I'm using metadata version 1.2 for the raid0 array and the type is > > > kernel based autodetect. > > > > Ouch, auto-detect does not work with metadata 1.2. > > Please rea

Re: [gentoo-user] ifconfig and ppp0 address

2012-12-11 Thread Helmut Jarausch
On 12/11/2012 12:33:15 PM, Bill Kenworthy wrote: For years I have been using ifconfig and some simple shell magic to extract the ip address from the adsl ppp session when it changes. The latest update has changed the output format of ifconfig breaking things so if ifconfig cant be relied on,

Re: [gentoo-user] Localmount starts before LVM

2012-12-11 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:48:13 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > I'm using metadata version 1.2 for the raid0 array and the type is > > kernel based autodetect. > > Ouch, auto-detect does not work with metadata 1.2. > Please read the man-page section: > > Please rebuild the raid-device using v0.90

Re: [gentoo-user] ifconfig and ppp0 address

2012-12-11 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:33:15 +0800 Bill Kenworthy wrote: > For years I have been using ifconfig and some simple shell magic to > extract the ip address from the adsl ppp session when it changes. The > latest update has changed the output format of ifconfig breaking > things so if ifconfig cant b

[gentoo-user] ifconfig and ppp0 address

2012-12-11 Thread Bill Kenworthy
For years I have been using ifconfig and some simple shell magic to extract the ip address from the adsl ppp session when it changes. The latest update has changed the output format of ifconfig breaking things so if ifconfig cant be relied on, what's normally used to extract an interfaces IP addre

Re: [gentoo-user] Localmount starts before LVM

2012-12-11 Thread J. Roeleveld
> On Tuesday 11 December 2012 04:52 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: >> Which metadata version did you use for the software raid setup? >> >> Can you add "mdadm" to the boot-runlevel? >> > > I'm using metadata version 1.2 for the raid0 array and the type is > kernel based autodetect. Ouch, auto-detect d

Re: [gentoo-user] Localmount starts before LVM

2012-12-11 Thread Nilesh Govindrajan
On Tuesday 11 December 2012 04:52 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > What is the end-result without the lines? > > localmount fails at mounting /var /home and /tmp (while swap gets mounted which is *also* on LVM because lvm starts up before the swap gets activated). > > I use an older version still.

Re: [gentoo-user] Localmount starts before LVM

2012-12-11 Thread J. Roeleveld
> On Tuesday 11 December 2012 01:14:39 PM IST, J. Roeleveld wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have a raid0 (kernel autodetect) array, over which I have put LVM >>> and then there are volumes on the LVM for /var, /tmp, swap and /home. >>> >>> The problem is, raid0 array gets recognized, but localmount fails

Re: [gentoo-user] Localmount starts before LVM

2012-12-11 Thread Nilesh Govindrajan
On Tuesday 11 December 2012 01:14:39 PM IST, J. Roeleveld wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a raid0 (kernel autodetect) array, over which I have put LVM >> and then there are volumes on the LVM for /var, /tmp, swap and /home. >> >> The problem is, raid0 array gets recognized, but localmount fails to >> mo

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: broadcom-sta and the 3.6.x kernel

2012-12-11 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 11 Dec 2012 09:04:59 Nuno J. Silva wrote: > On 2012-12-07, Mick wrote: > > On Tuesday 04 Dec 2012 15:30:04 Dustin C. Hatch wrote: > >> On 12/4/2012 06:11, Florian Philipp wrote: > >> > Do you actually need broadcom-sta anymore? With the recent kernel > >> > updates more chips work with t

[gentoo-user] Re: broadcom-sta and the 3.6.x kernel

2012-12-11 Thread Nuno J. Silva
On 2012-12-07, Mick wrote: > On Tuesday 04 Dec 2012 15:30:04 Dustin C. Hatch wrote: >> On 12/4/2012 06:11, Florian Philipp wrote: >> > Do you actually need broadcom-sta anymore? With the recent kernel >> > updates more chips work with the in-kernel driver (brcmsmac). But the >> > config option is

Re: [gentoo-user] openrc - network configuration fails - how to debug it

2012-12-11 Thread Helmut Jarausch
On 12/09/2012 05:50:35 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 09 Dec 2012 15:18:49 +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote: > config_wlan0="192.168.1.3 netmsk 255.255.255.0" ^ If this is a direct paste from your config, there's the problem. Thanks Neil for spotting this. It was