Re: [gentoo-user] alsa: missing default device

2014-09-23 Thread Walter Dnes
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 02:59:17PM +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 07:22:12PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 05:49:10PM +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote > > > > > * I toggled those settings and rebuilt, but the result is still the same. > > > > You

[gentoo-user] Re: devmanual searching

2014-09-23 Thread James
Jc García gmail.com> writes: 'app-doc/devmanual' Yep, Installed! Thx, James

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: devmanual searching

2014-09-23 Thread Jc García
2014-09-23 14:49 GMT-06:00 James : > Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes: > > >> just add "site:devmanual.gentoo.org" to your search string > > site:devmanual.gentoo.org : URI > > Yep, it's what I've been doing. However, it has lots of sporadic > noise in the search (ignoring devmanual) too often. Pl

[gentoo-user] Re: journald refuses to put log files in /var/log/journal/ [REALLY SOLVED]

2014-09-23 Thread walt
On 09/23/2014 11:28 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 1:40 PM, walt wrote: >> On 09/23/2014 07:46 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:27 AM, walt wrote: I used systemctl to stop and restart systemd-journald, thinking I might see some useful error

[gentoo-user] Re: devmanual searching

2014-09-23 Thread James
Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes: > just add "site:devmanual.gentoo.org" to your search string site:devmanual.gentoo.org : URI Yep, it's what I've been doing. However, it has lots of sporadic noise in the search (ignoring devmanual) too often. Plus it does not necessarily search the document,

Re: [gentoo-user] Systemd and PyTimeChart

2014-09-23 Thread Mark David Dumlao
On Sep 24, 2014 2:34 AM, "James" wrote: > > Hello > > PyTimeChart is another wonderful tool that complements > Ftrace/trace-cmd/KernelShark. [1] The systemd supporters would be keenly > wise if they added pytimechart to Gentoo, so those (systemd) reticent to > change, can actually see just how won

Re: [gentoo-user] devmanual searching

2014-09-23 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 23/09/2014 22:07, James wrote: > Hello, > > I find my self needing to search devmanual.gentoo.org, globally, > for random keywords. The document does not appear to be a single, > flat file, in any locations on the net. All I can do is search > by section or search the index > > For example "U

[gentoo-user] devmanual searching

2014-09-23 Thread James
Hello, I find my self needing to search devmanual.gentoo.org, globally, for random keywords. The document does not appear to be a single, flat file, in any locations on the net. All I can do is search by section or search the index For example "URI" or "EGIT_REPO_URI" . Clarity or other options

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: journald refuses to put log files in /var/log/journal/ [NOT SOLVED]

2014-09-23 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> >> I don't understand everything about that message, but it seems to imply >> that systemd may think that the local filesystems are not mounted(?) >> >> Could this be causing my journald problem, maybe? > > Where is lvm.service coming from? I

[gentoo-user] Systemd and PyTimeChart

2014-09-23 Thread James
Hello PyTimeChart is another wonderful tool that complements Ftrace/trace-cmd/KernelShark. [1] The systemd supporters would be keenly wise if they added pytimechart to Gentoo, so those (systemd) reticent to change, can actually see just how wonderful systemd is Here in slide (26) we see "intel

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: journald refuses to put log files in /var/log/journal/ [NOT SOLVED]

2014-09-23 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 1:40 PM, walt wrote: > On 09/23/2014 07:46 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:27 AM, walt wrote: >>> >>> I used systemctl to stop and restart systemd-journald, thinking I might >>> see some useful error messages. But when systemd-journal started up >>>

[gentoo-user] Re: journald refuses to put log files in /var/log/journal/ [NOT SOLVED]

2014-09-23 Thread walt
On 09/23/2014 07:46 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:27 AM, walt wrote: >> >> I used systemctl to stop and restart systemd-journald, thinking I might >> see some useful error messages. But when systemd-journal started up >> again the journal file was back in /var/log/journal w

[gentoo-user] Re:

2014-09-23 Thread James
James tampabay.rr.com> writes: > Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes: > > > '-fstack-protector-strong' is supported as of gcc-4.9.x - unless you > > > upgrade, you'll forced to use the regular one. There is an old but very concise example of Ftrace/trace-cmd/kernelshark for anyone interested. ht

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: journald refuses to put log files in /var/log/journal/ [SOLVED]

2014-09-23 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:27 AM, walt wrote: > > I used systemctl to stop and restart systemd-journald, thinking I might > see some useful error messages. But when systemd-journal started up > again the journal file was back in /var/log/journal where I want it :) > > No idea why rebooting the ma

[gentoo-user] Re: "stack-protector-strong" option results in gcc error

2014-09-23 Thread James
Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes: > > '-fstack-protector-strong' is supported as of gcc-4.9.x - unless you > > upgrade, you'll forced to use the regular one. > > I think it's not even that unlikely that you don't even want the strong > > version. > Ironically enough, your last sentence overflo

[gentoo-user] Re: journald refuses to put log files in /var/log/journal/ [SOLVED]

2014-09-23 Thread walt
On 09/22/2014 08:50 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 7:41 PM, walt wrote: >> My main desktop machine is obviously having a brain fart :( >> >> systemd-journald is allegedly obligated to write its journal files >> to /var/log/journal/ *if* that directory exists, right? >> >>

Re: [gentoo-user] "stack-protector-strong" option results in gcc error

2014-09-23 Thread Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 03:06:20PM +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 08:47:31 AM Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen > > > > wrote: > > > '-fstack-protector-strong' is supported as of gcc-4.9.x - unless you > > > upgrade, yo

Re: [gentoo-user] "stack-protector-strong" option results in gcc error

2014-09-23 Thread Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 09:33:45AM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 09/23/2014 04:54 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: > > > > Gentoo stable appears to be gcc-4.7.3-r1. ebuilds up to gcc-4.9.1 are > > present in the tree. Upgrading gcc is painful, so I appreciate the > > maintainers not forcing a rebu

Re: [gentoo-user] "stack-protector-strong" option results in gcc error

2014-09-23 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 09/23/2014 04:54 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: > > Gentoo stable appears to be gcc-4.7.3-r1. ebuilds up to gcc-4.9.1 are > present in the tree. Upgrading gcc is painful, so I appreciate the > maintainers not forcing a rebuild with every version bump. That's the > philosophy behind "stable". The

Re: [gentoo-user] "stack-protector-strong" option results in gcc error

2014-09-23 Thread J. Roeleveld
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 08:47:31 AM Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen > > wrote: > > '-fstack-protector-strong' is supported as of gcc-4.9.x - unless you > > upgrade, you'll forced to use the regular one. > > > >... > > > > I think it's not even

Re: [gentoo-user] alsa: missing default device

2014-09-23 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 07:22:12PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 05:49:10PM +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote > > > * I toggled those settings and rebuilt, but the result is still the same. > > You may have to configure your sound card setup manually. It's not as > scarey as

Re: [gentoo-user] "stack-protector-strong" option results in gcc error

2014-09-23 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote: > > '-fstack-protector-strong' is supported as of gcc-4.9.x - unless you upgrade, > you'll forced to use the regular one. >... > I think it's not even that unlikely that you don't even want the strong > version. Ironically enough, you

Re: [gentoo-user] "stack-protector-strong" option results in gcc error

2014-09-23 Thread Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 09:16:42AM +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 5:49 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: > > CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h > > UPD include/generated/utsrelease.h > > CC kernel/bounds.s > > gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-fstack

Re: [gentoo-user] "stack-protector-strong" option results in gcc error

2014-09-23 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 04:54:03 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: > Gentoo stable appears to be gcc-4.7.3-r1. ebuilds up to gcc-4.9.1 are > present in the tree. Upgrading gcc is painful, so I appreciate the > maintainers not forcing a rebuild with every version bump. Upgrading gcc hasn't been painful fo

[gentoo-user] Re: "stack-protector-strong" option results in gcc error

2014-09-23 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 23/09/14 11:54, Walter Dnes wrote: On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 09:16:42AM +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote Looks like support for '-fstack-protector-strong' was implemented in more recent versions of gcc. The the URL below for details: https://securityblog.redhat.com/tag/stack-protector/ Tha

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is kde really buggy or it is me?!

2014-09-23 Thread J. Roeleveld
On Saturday, September 20, 2014 09:47:51 PM Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 18/09/14 16:15, behrouz khosravi wrote: > > Hi. > > I have just installed the kde desktop. I like the overall experience but > > its kind of buggy. For example the last problem that I had, system > > setting was not respondi

Re: [gentoo-user] "stack-protector-strong" option results in gcc error

2014-09-23 Thread Walter Dnes
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 09:16:42AM +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote > > Looks like support for '-fstack-protector-strong' was implemented in > more recent versions of gcc. The the URL below for details: > > https://securityblog.redhat.com/tag/stack-protector/ Thanks for the explanation. The blo