On Wednesday 18 March 2015 04:33:18 Dale wrote:
Well, /boot doesn't change to much, plus it is fairly small anyway. The
root partition doesn't change a whole lot either. /usr tho, it tends to
grow. If nothing else, it grows as KDE grows but it grows with the
number of kernels I have too.
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 05:11:25 +0100, Tamer Higazi wrote:
Hi people!
I have problems getting these blocks at a system update solved...
I executed:
emerge --backtrack=30 -fuDN @system @world
...
...
[blocks B ] perl-core/ExtUtils-Install-1.670.0
(perl-core/ExtUtils-Install-1.670.0 is
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday 17 March 2015 16:07:29 Dale wrote:
I don't have / on lvm. /boot and / are on regular partitions.
Everything else, /usr, /var and /home, are on lvm. Keep in mind, I
was trying to avoid that init thingy.
I remember something of that discussion, but not why
On Tuesday 17 March 2015 16:07:29 Dale wrote:
I don't have / on lvm. /boot and / are on regular partitions.
Everything else, /usr, /var and /home, are on lvm. Keep in mind, I
was trying to avoid that init thingy.
I remember something of that discussion, but not why you wanted to keep /usr
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 08:54:40 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
I don't have / on lvm. /boot and / are on regular partitions.
Everything else, /usr, /var and /home, are on lvm. Keep in mind, I
was trying to avoid that init thingy.
I remember something of that discussion, but not why you
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
You are reading it wrong. That means:
util-linux needs to be built with USE=static-libs
because
lvm2 is already built with USE=static
None of which explains why you originally built lvm2 that way.
It
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Wednesday 18 March 2015 04:33:18 Dale wrote:
Well, /boot doesn't change to much, plus it is fairly small anyway. The
root partition doesn't change a whole lot either. /usr tho, it tends to
grow. If nothing else, it grows as KDE grows but it grows with the
number
On Wednesday 18 March 2015 11:14:43 Dale wrote:
Well, since I set this rig up, I have had to grow /usr twice. The only
reason I have not had to grow it recently is because I moved all the
portage stuff to /var. In the past, I had to move everything to another
drive, rework the partitions,
Poncho wrote:
On 18.03.2015 17:37, Rich Freeman wrote:
[...]
You can look inside an initramfs by doing the following:
mkdir /tmp/ext
cd /tmp/ext
zcat /boot/initramfs-3.18.9-gentoo.img | cpio -i
find usr
find lib64
...
[...]
dracut comes with the /usr/bin/lsinitrd tool. pretty
Meino.Cramer at gmx.de writes:
Then I installed dev-lisp/gcl there (which compiles fine).
You might want to cross-compile the codes and dependent codes
on a x86 machine and move them over, as another test
I'd first try by only setting the minimum you need to get
the codes to compile.
On 18.03.2015 17:37, Rich Freeman wrote:
[...]
You can look inside an initramfs by doing the following:
mkdir /tmp/ext
cd /tmp/ext
zcat /boot/initramfs-3.18.9-gentoo.img | cpio -i
find usr
find lib64
...
[...]
dracut comes with the /usr/bin/lsinitrd tool. pretty convenient.
With the -f
On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 4:41:25 PM walt wrote:
On 03/17/2015 04:49 PM, walt wrote:
I get a certificate verification error when visiting https://www.att.com
using firefox-36.0, but not when using chrome-41.0.2272.76.
Thanks to all who replied. I'm surprised by the variety of different
On Wednesday 18 March 2015 13:12:47 Dale wrote:
I switched way back in 2003 when it was rare that a init thingy was needed
in Gentoo. It seems someone screwed that up.
I still don't have one, nor do I foresee a need.
I try to keep a few fall back plans around. Spare kernels etc.
One old
On 03/18/2015 04:41 PM, walt wrote:
On 03/17/2015 04:49 PM, walt wrote:
I get a certificate verification error when visiting https://www.att.com
using firefox-36.0, but not when using chrome-41.0.2272.76.
Thanks to all who replied. I'm surprised by the variety of different results
you
On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 9:56:12 PM Walter Dnes wrote:
My situation...
* I've dug up my ancient netbook, and got Gentoo re-installed on it
* The cpu is a dual-core Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU Z520
* It's 32-bit only; YES!
* Compiling just the Seamonkey binary (ignoring its dependancies)
Amazing and with real potential!
I have partially updated the image but can't update python and some
other packages because they want /dev/shm. The Android kernel uses
/dev/ashmem with a different API to /dev/shm - other than a custom
kernel, is there another workaround?
BillK
On 17 March 2015
On 03/17/2015 04:49 PM, walt wrote:
I get a certificate verification error when visiting https://www.att.com
using firefox-36.0, but not when using chrome-41.0.2272.76.
Thanks to all who replied. I'm surprised by the variety of different results
you reported.
(BTW, I'm running
My situation...
* I've dug up my ancient netbook, and got Gentoo re-installed on it
* The cpu is a dual-core Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU Z520
* It's 32-bit only; YES!
* Compiling just the Seamonkey binary (ignoring its dependancies) took
14 hours
I obviously want to offload compiling to another
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:27:05PM -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote
On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 9:56:12 PM Walter Dnes wrote:
My situation...
* I've dug up my ancient netbook, and got Gentoo re-installed on it
* The cpu is a dual-core Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU Z520
* It's 32-bit only;
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Wednesday 18 March 2015 13:12:47 Dale wrote:
I switched way back in 2003 when it was rare that a init thingy was needed
in Gentoo. It seems someone screwed that up.
I still don't have one, nor do I foresee a need.
I didn't have one until I recently rebooted and got
On Thursday, March 19, 2015 12:20:26 AM Walter Dnes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:27:05PM -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote
On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 9:56:12 PM Walter Dnes wrote:
My situation...
* I've dug up my ancient netbook, and got Gentoo re-installed on it
* The cpu
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:47:04 -0700
Daniel Frey djqf...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/17/2015 04:49 PM, walt wrote:
I get a certificate verification error when visiting
https://www.att.com using firefox-36.0, but not when using
chrome-41.0.2272.76.
Anyone else see the same with firefox-36?
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought there was a tool that just lists the contents. Things is, I'm
not sure what I would be looking at.
An initramfs is just a root filesystem. init is /sbin/init unless the
kernel is told otherwise.
If you took your
On Wednesday 18 Mar 2015 03:53:57 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 4:49:54 PM walt wrote:
I get a certificate verification error when visiting https://www.att.com
using firefox-36.0, but not when using chrome-41.0.2272.76.
Anyone else see the same with firefox-36?
24 matches
Mail list logo
