On 14 July 2015 at 08:42, Martin Vaeth wrote:
> Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>>
>> Only issue I could not find a solution to is tab completion after '=',
>> for example:
>>
>> xxx --file=
>>
>> This will not complete files, while it will be nice if it does.
>
> For standard commands, it works as it should
On Monday, July 13, 2015 7:22:30 PM hw wrote:
>
> So what happened to the 'hvm' USE flag of the "xen-tools" package?
>
> http://gentoobrowse.randomdan.homeip.net/package/app-emulation/xen-tools
> says there is such a flag. However:
>
>
> moonflo ~ # equery uses xen-tools
> [ Legend : U - fina
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
> Only issue I could not find a solution to is tab completion after '=',
> for example:
>
> xxx --file=
>
> This will not complete files, while it will be nice if it does.
For standard commands, it works as it should. For instance,
tar --file=
chmod --reference=
dd if=
all
Michael Orlitzky gentoo.org> writes:
> You can file a bug upstream. They might not know the old name is
> deprecated. Here's the reference:
Yea, ok, I'll get around to this sooner or later.
THX! (to all for info)
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2013-06/msg9.html
> - Auto
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 05:19:46 -0700
walt wrote:
> Today's update started as a disaster: perl wants to upgrade from
> 5.20.2 to 5.22.0, but all of my existing perl modules insist on having
> 5.20.2 so the perl update blocks and then emerge stopped with an error
The problem was caused by a single
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:31:18 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > It worked for me after I added --backtrack=30
>
> That was it. After using that option, it works.
>
> So I guess the default value is not good enough.
>
That explains why I had no problem, I have --backtrack=20 in
EMERGE_DEFAUL
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 23:02:15 +0100, Mick wrote:
> > /boot in fstab had option "noauto", so all my kernels were installed
> > to the / volume.
>
> Ahh! I always mount /boot BEFORE I cd into /usr/src out of habit, to
> avoid such a problem (my /boot is also set to noauto).
>
> If I were 10 year
On 14/07/2015 00:02, Mick wrote:
> On Monday 13 Jul 2015 20:50:47 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> /boot in fstab had option "noauto", so all my kernels were installed to
>> the / volume.
>
> Ahh! I always mount /boot BEFORE I cd into /usr/src out of habit, to avoid
> such a problem (my /boot is also
On Monday 13 Jul 2015 20:50:47 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> /boot in fstab had option "noauto", so all my kernels were installed to
> the / volume.
Ahh! I always mount /boot BEFORE I cd into /usr/src out of habit, to avoid
such a problem (my /boot is also set to noauto).
If I were 10 years younger I
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 1:22 PM, hw wrote:
>
> So what happened to the 'hvm' USE flag of the "xen-tools" package?
>
Something is wrong with your repository. The flag is there.
I would suggest that you start by disabling any overlays, and run emerge --sync.
floppym@naomi ~ % equery uses xen-tool
On 13/07/2015 19:22, hw wrote:
>
> So what happened to the 'hvm' USE flag of the "xen-tools" package?
>
> http://gentoobrowse.randomdan.homeip.net/package/app-emulation/xen-tools
> says there is such a flag. However:
>
>
> moonflo ~ # equery uses xen-tools
> [ Legend : U - final flag setting f
On 13/07/2015 18:42, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>> Did a new install, the new kernel can't load modules:
>>
>> # modprobe nfsv3
>> modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'nfsv3': Exec format error
>>
>> Odd. Never had this before. The module file
On 13/07/2015 19:47, Mick wrote:
> On Monday 13 Jul 2015 17:42:22 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>>> Did a new install, the new kernel can't load modules:
>>>
>>> # modprobe nfsv3
>>> modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'nfsv3': Exec format error
On 13/07/2015 18:42, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>> Did a new install, the new kernel can't load modules:
>>
>> # modprobe nfsv3
>> modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'nfsv3': Exec format error
>>
>> Odd. Never had this before. The module file
Nikos Chantziaras [15-07-13 20:36]:
> On 13/07/15 19:04, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> >Are crosscompilers freely available for it (or is this
> >CPU even i386 compatible)
>
> It's x86 and x86-64 compatible (it's a 64-bit CPU).
>
> With "-march=native", GCC will use the most appropriate instr
On 13/07/15 19:04, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Are crosscompilers freely available for it (or is this
CPU even i386 compatible)
It's x86 and x86-64 compatible (it's a 64-bit CPU).
With "-march=native", GCC will use the most appropriate instruction sets
for this CPU.
On 13 July 2015 at 10:12, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
> On 13 July 2015 at 04:52, walt wrote:
> > Maybe someone here has missed the recent discussion of zsh? ;)
> >
> > I just found this website, giving a wonderful primer on how to
> > configure zsh:
> >
> > http://wiki.redbrick.dcu.ie/mw/Account_Custo
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:01 PM, hw wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get a windoze 7 to run as a domU on a fresh install of
> gentoo with xen. I need to use the installer ISO to boot from and to
> install into a partition on a physical disk.
>
> Running 'xl -vvv create /etc/xen/ws-01.hvm' gives
On Monday 13 Jul 2015 17:42:22 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> > Did a new install, the new kernel can't load modules:
> >
> > # modprobe nfsv3
> > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'nfsv3': Exec format error
> >
> > Odd. Never had this before.
So what happened to the 'hvm' USE flag of the "xen-tools" package?
http://gentoobrowse.randomdan.homeip.net/package/app-emulation/xen-tools
says there is such a flag. However:
moonflo ~ # equery uses xen-tools
[ Legend : U - final flag setting for installation]
[: I - package is ins
Am Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:03:10 + (UTC)
schrieb Grant Edwards :
> On 2015-07-12, Marc Joliet wrote:
>
> > With regards to the other replies: I think physical destruction is
> > unnecessary, and I don't really want to go through the trouble.
>
> If it's "trouble" rather than "fun", then you're
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Did a new install, the new kernel can't load modules:
>
> # modprobe nfsv3
> modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'nfsv3': Exec format error
>
> Odd. Never had this before. The module file itself is a regular 64-bit
> ELF file, just as it should
Hi,
I am on the way to decide for a tablet PC (7") to use it as a platform
for installing Linux (preferred: Gentoo!) on it and compile software
for it for usage of decoding shortwave audio transmissions (i.e. morse
code, sstv, etc.) for example.
I mean this NOT performance wise or anything else
Martin Vaeth wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >
> > bash vs. POSIX, as bash tried to ignore long existing
> > rules just because the bash maintainer did not understand them.
>
> Are there really several? I know only one such example:
One is that "sh -ce cmd" did not exit on error for some kind
On 2015-07-12, Marc Joliet wrote:
> With regards to the other replies: I think physical destruction is
> unnecessary, and I don't really want to go through the trouble.
If it's "trouble" rather than "fun", then you're doing it wrong. :)
There's thermite:
http://hackaday.com/2008/09/16/how-t
On 2015-07-10, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
>> Do you folks notice that google is triying to control the way we live?!
>>
>> belive me or not, sometimes I feel I am living in the 1984 novel ?!
>
> What? They don’t control the way I live.
Which is _exactly_ what you would post if Google _were_ contro
Martin Vaeth wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Martin Vaeth wrote:
> >>
> >> This is not true, either: Although finally bash took some of the
> >> features of zsh (arrays, regular expression matching, etc.) there
> >> are still many features missing in bash (extended globbing, many
> >> varia
Did a new install, the new kernel can't load modules:
# modprobe nfsv3
modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'nfsv3': Exec format error
Odd. Never had this before. The module file itself is a regular 64-bit
ELF file, just as it should be (compared to a working module on another
machine)
gcc is 4.8.4
Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> bash vs. POSIX, as bash tried to ignore long existing
> rules just because the bash maintainer did not understand them.
Are there really several? I know only one such example:
bash insists on compound commands ("{ ... }" or "( ... )")
for the function body while accordi
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Martin Vaeth wrote:
>>
>> This is not true, either: Although finally bash took some of the
>> features of zsh (arrays, regular expression matching, etc.) there
>> are still many features missing in bash (extended globbing, many
>> variable and array operations etc.)
>
> A
On 13/07/15 16:01, Simon Thelen wrote:
On 15-07-13 at 05:19, walt wrote:
Today's update started as a disaster: perl wants to upgrade from
5.20.2 to 5.22.0, but all of my existing perl modules insist on having
5.20.2 so the perl update blocks and then emerge stopped with an error
[...]
It worke
On 15-07-13 at 05:19, walt wrote:
> Today's update started as a disaster: perl wants to upgrade from
> 5.20.2 to 5.22.0, but all of my existing perl modules insist on having
> 5.20.2 so the perl update blocks and then emerge stopped with an error
> and left the whole mess for me to solve. (To me t
On 13/07/2015 14:58, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 05:19:46 -0700, walt wrote:
>
>> Today's update started as a disaster: perl wants to upgrade from
>> 5.20.2 to 5.22.0, but all of my existing perl modules insist on having
>> 5.20.2 so the perl update blocks and then emerge stopped w
Hi,
I'm trying to get a windoze 7 to run as a domU on a fresh install of
gentoo with xen. I need to use the installer ISO to boot from and to
install into a partition on a physical disk.
Running 'xl -vvv create /etc/xen/ws-01.hvm' gives me the following messages:
Parsing config from /etc/
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 05:19:46 -0700, walt wrote:
> Today's update started as a disaster: perl wants to upgrade from
> 5.20.2 to 5.22.0, but all of my existing perl modules insist on having
> 5.20.2 so the perl update blocks and then emerge stopped with an error
> and left the whole mess for me to
On 13/07/15 15:19, walt wrote:
Today's update started as a disaster: perl wants to upgrade from
5.20.2 to 5.22.0, but all of my existing perl modules insist on having
5.20.2 so the perl update blocks and then emerge stopped with an error
and left the whole mess for me to solve. (To me this appea
Today's update started as a disaster: perl wants to upgrade from
5.20.2 to 5.22.0, but all of my existing perl modules insist on having
5.20.2 so the perl update blocks and then emerge stopped with an error
and left the whole mess for me to solve. (To me this appears to be a
bug in the perl family
Am Sun, 12 Jul 2015 18:32:39 +0200
schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann :
> Am 12.07.2015 um 14:35 schrieb Marc Joliet:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have to failed drives that I want to give away for recycling purposes, but
> > want to be sure to properly clear them first. They used be part of a btrfs
> > RAID10 ar
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
> Am 12.07.2015 um 23:30 schrieb Rich Freeman:
>> Impossible is a pretty bold claim. You need proof, not evidence that
>> a particular recovery technique didn't work. I can demonstrate very
>> clearly that I'm unable to crack DES, but
Am Mon, 13 Jul 2015 01:50:57 +
schrieb "Thomas Mueller" :
> All that has been said on this thread supposes that the hard drive is still
> readable and writable.
>
> But the original post stated this was a failed drive.
>
> Then you might not be able to dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdx .. or what
Am Sun, 12 Jul 2015 22:43:44 +0200
schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann :
> http://www.howtogeek.com/115573/htg-explains-why-you-only-have-to-wipe-a-disk-once-to-erase-it/
Yeah, that was linked from the Arch wiki I looked at.
> http://www.vidarholen.net/~vidar/overwriting_hard_drive_data.pdf
FWIW, Pete
Marc Joliet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have to failed drives that I want to give away for recycling purposes, but
> want to be sure to properly clear them first. They used be part of a btrfs
The test patterns used on Solaris and marked with "federal requirements" are:
int purge_patterns[]= {
Martin Vaeth wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >
> > In one sub-thread we've so far managed to cover:
> >
> > Bash vs Zsh
> > Vim vs Emacs
> > Perl vs Python
>
> not to forget: POSIX vs Bash
Let us better call it bash vs. POSIX, as bash tried to ignore long existing
rules just because the bash m
On Monday 13 July 2015 11:21:22 Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > On 10/07/15 02:34, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > > I tried it [zsh], for exactly 10 seconds. My home/end keys didn't work.
> > > This gave me the impression of an unfinished project. Why on earth
> > > would anyon
Martin Vaeth wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > As a
> > scripting language, Bash is probably better
>
> This is not true, either: Although finally bash took some of the
> features of zsh (arrays, regular expression matching, etc.) there
> are still many features missing in bash (extended globbin
I'm on 4.1.2 with no problems. Sorry to check the obvious, are you sure you
copied your config over from your previous kernel? The only time I got a
kernel panic after a minor kernel upgrade was when I forgot to do this and
as a result compiled the default kernel without support for LVM.
Alex
On
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 10/07/15 02:34, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > I tried it [zsh], for exactly 10 seconds. My home/end keys didn't work. This
> > gave me the impression of an unfinished project. Why on earth would
> > anyone release a program after 1990 that doesn't know the home/end ke
Am 13.07.2015 um 03:50 schrieb Thomas Mueller:
> All that has been said on this thread supposes that the hard drive is still
> readable and writable.
>
> But the original post stated this was a failed drive.
>
> Then you might not be able to dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdx .. or whatever else.
>
> You
Am 12.07.2015 um 23:30 schrieb Rich Freeman:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
> wrote:
>> read the second link I provided.
>>
> I did. It contains no theoretical arguments against the possibility
yes it does.
> of data recovery. Theoretical limits would be ones like the
Have you tried another (differnt make/model) keyboard?
If you get the same problem,it is software related,
if it goes away, then you are good to go.
In Parameters Keyboard Settings I found a line with
Command . and shortcut .
I removed it, and now it's ok.
Thank you for your answers
Roger
I moved to zsh and never looked back, like, never.
This is what hooked me: http://ohmyz.sh/
It has been a wonderful experience ever since.
Em seg, 13 de jul de 2015 às 04:14, Alon Bar-Lev
escreveu:
> On 13 July 2015 at 04:52, walt wrote:
> > Maybe someone here has missed the recent discussion
On 13 July 2015 at 04:52, walt wrote:
> Maybe someone here has missed the recent discussion of zsh? ;)
>
> I just found this website, giving a wonderful primer on how to
> configure zsh:
>
> http://wiki.redbrick.dcu.ie/mw/Account_Customisation_(zsh)
>
I also moved to zsh just to check.
So apart
52 matches
Mail list logo