Re: [gentoo-user] pvcreate on LUKS container -> 'Device not found'

2016-03-08 Thread Willie Matthews
On 03/08/2016 03:02 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 02:03:27PM -0800, Willie Matthews wrote: >> On 03/08/2016 01:41 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: >>> Hi folks >>> >>> I’m trying to follow an article¹ on setting up a fully encrypted system for >>> my soon-to-arrive laptop.

Re: [gentoo-user] pvcreate on LUKS container -> 'Device not found'

2016-03-08 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:50:19PM -0800, Max R.D. Parmer wrote: > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016, at 15:06, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 12:02:23AM +0100, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > > > > > If you would like to get rid of the /run/lvm/lvmetad.socket error just > > > > start lvm

Re: [gentoo-user] pvcreate on LUKS container -> 'Device not found'

2016-03-08 Thread Max R.D. Parmer
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016, at 15:06, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 12:02:23AM +0100, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > > > If you would like to get rid of the /run/lvm/lvmetad.socket error just > > > start lvm with "service lvm start". I still get the error when starting > > > up but

Re: [gentoo-user] pvcreate on LUKS container -> 'Device not found'

2016-03-08 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 12:02:23AM +0100, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > If you would like to get rid of the /run/lvm/lvmetad.socket error just > > start lvm with "service lvm start". I still get the error when starting > > up but it still works. > > I noticed that and quickly found

Re: [gentoo-user] pvcreate on LUKS container -> 'Device not found'

2016-03-08 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 02:03:27PM -0800, Willie Matthews wrote: > On 03/08/2016 01:41 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > Hi folks > > > > I’m trying to follow an article¹ on setting up a fully encrypted system for > > my soon-to-arrive laptop. It and others (e.g. ² in a very condensed form) > >

Re: [gentoo-user] pvcreate on LUKS container -> 'Device not found'

2016-03-08 Thread Willie Matthews
On 03/08/2016 01:41 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > Hi folks > > I’m trying to follow an article¹ on setting up a fully encrypted system for > my soon-to-arrive laptop. It and others (e.g. ² in a very condensed form) > simply luksFormat a block device, then luksOpen it and run pvcreate on that. >

[gentoo-user] pvcreate on LUKS container -> 'Device not found'

2016-03-08 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Hi folks I’m trying to follow an article¹ on setting up a fully encrypted system for my soon-to-arrive laptop. It and others (e.g. ² in a very condensed form) simply luksFormat a block device, then luksOpen it and run pvcreate on that. I’ve never used LVM before, it’s only installed as a

Re: [gentoo-user] 200+ package updates!

2016-03-08 Thread Francisco Ares
2016-03-08 10:53 GMT-03:00 Andrew Tselischev : > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 10:06:32AM -0300, Francisco Ares wrote: > > Hi, All. > > > > This is just to say "Congrats!" to all developers of our beloved distro. > > All individual package maintenance tasks and overall

Re: [gentoo-user] Is Calligra / KRITA currently compilable

2016-03-08 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 20:20:29 +0100, Paul Klos wrote: > Well, I figured out what the issue was. I had left an obsolete patch > file hanging around in /etc/portage, which was causing a failure. Been there, done that. epatch_user is both a blessing and a curse. -- Neil Bothwick There are only

Re: [gentoo-user] Is Calligra / KRITA currently compilable

2016-03-08 Thread Paul Klos
Op zondag 6 maart 2016 13:40:11 schreef Daniel Frey: > On 03/06/2016 09:21 AM, Paul Klos wrote: > > Could you share your use flags? Calligra stopped compiling here a few > > weeks ago. I'd be interested to see if there any differences. > > I recompiled stable and it was fine. I also unmasked

[gentoo-user] ebuild development scripts

2016-03-08 Thread James
Hello, So for a while I've been collecting up various scripts and packages that help one develop on gentoo. About a year ago I installed a package that I had forgotten about:: /usr/local/portage/portage. It has all sorts of development checking scripts and docs such as::

[gentoo-user] Re: dealing with distfiles bloat?

2016-03-08 Thread James
Alexander Kapshuk gmail.com> writes: > > I can't really read the stupid unformatted du output but it looks like I > > have 30 gb of bloat in some 3,600 files in my distfiles directory. is > > there any sane way to prune out some of the older versions, I am in no > > mood to spend all day

Re: [gentoo-user] app-office/impressive without gcj

2016-03-08 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 22:31:10 -0400 Zhu Sha Zang wrote: > Hello there, > > Someone know a way to compile/install the software app-office/impressive > without using gcj use flag? > > It's too much time to recompile gcc with this useless and weird "java" > support. There is no way. impressive

Re: [gentoo-user] 200+ package updates!

2016-03-08 Thread Andrew Tselischev
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 10:06:32AM -0300, Francisco Ares wrote: > Hi, All. > > This is just to say "Congrats!" to all developers of our beloved distro. > All individual package maintenance tasks and overall coordination efforts > are, as always, from my point of view, fantastic, but this

[gentoo-user] 200+ package updates!

2016-03-08 Thread Francisco Ares
Hi, All. This is just to say "Congrats!" to all developers of our beloved distro. All individual package maintenance tasks and overall coordination efforts are, as always, from my point of view, fantastic, but this orchestration exceeds all I've seen. Congratulations! And, please, keep the

[gentoo-user] Re: KDE's confusing versions

2016-03-08 Thread James
Michael Palimaka gentoo.org> writes: > > If so, is there a list of which kde applications can be installed without > > the KDE bloat (simple QT5) requirements? > You've always been able to pick and choose individual KDE applications > without installing all of KDE, although in KDE 4 we did

[gentoo-user] Re: KDE's confusing versions

2016-03-08 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 08/03/16 03:55, James wrote: > Jonathan Callen gentoo.org> writes: > > > >> Note that upstream split the old "KDE Software Compilation" (formerly >> "KDE Desktop Environment") into three separate parts: KDE Frameworks, >> Plasma, and KDE Applications. > > > So does this mean that a system

[gentoo-user] Re: Qt5 X Qt4

2016-03-08 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 08/03/16 03:50, Francisco Ares wrote: > Even the new USE flags, qt4 and qt5 are still not completely capable to > switch to the desired Qt version prior to building, as, for instance, > "dev-util/cmake" and "app-doc/doxygen", I had to manually switch > "qtchooser" set up back to Qt4 before