Re: [gentoo-user] Borg 1.1 is out, when can we expect it in the repos?

On Sunday, October 8, 2017 6:48:14 PM CEST Viktar Patotski wrote: > Hi, > > The proper to get it done is to submit an upgrade request to > https://bugs.gentoo.org/ . And then even probably provide ebuild for > maintainers to pick it up. > > Best regards, > Viktar > > On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 7:36

Re: [gentoo-user] Borg 1.1 is out, when can we expect it in the repos?

> On 8 Oct 2017, at 17:48, Viktar Patotski wrote: > > The proper to get it done is to submit an upgrade request to > https://bugs.gentoo.org/ . And then even probably > provide ebuild for maintainers to pick it up. Someone's done it now: https://bugs.gentoo.org/6338

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge firefox-52.4.0 compile failure

On Mon, Oct 09 2017, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2017-10-09, Grant Edwards wrote: >> On 2017-10-09, R0b0t1 wrote: >> >>> In this case the namespace of the missing declaration is inside >>> Mozilla's, e.g. it is part of Firefox or a closely bundled library. >> >> Yep, after a bit more research, tha

[gentoo-user] Re: emerge firefox-52.4.0 compile failure

On 2017-10-09, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2017-10-09, R0b0t1 wrote: > >> In this case the namespace of the missing declaration is inside >> Mozilla's, e.g. it is part of Firefox or a closely bundled library. > > Yep, after a bit more research, that was my conclusion. > > The chromium build finishe

[gentoo-user] Re: emerge firefox-52.4.0 compile failure

On 2017-10-09, R0b0t1 wrote: > In this case the namespace of the missing declaration is inside > Mozilla's, e.g. it is part of Firefox or a closely bundled library. Yep, after a bit more research, that was my conclusion. The chromium build finished happily, so I've just started another firefox

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge firefox-52.4.0 compile failure

On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2017-10-08, R0b0t1 wrote: > >> Usually what happens is it will be corrupted in RAM after being >> verified on disk, and faulty results will be saved to disk from RAM. A >> user on the forums recently had this issue compiling dev-lang/vala,

Re: [gentoo-user] Error while starting Docker daemon

On Sunday, 8 October 2017 20:07:09 BST Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 08 Oct 2017 19:10:48 +0100, Mick wrote: > > From what I see above you are running btrfs. It may be worth compiling > > in your kernel this module you have left out, because I've read > > somewhere it prevents fs corruption (Rich

[gentoo-user] Re: emerge firefox-52.4.0 compile failure

On 2017-10-08, R0b0t1 wrote: > Usually what happens is it will be corrupted in RAM after being > verified on disk, and faulty results will be saved to disk from RAM. A > user on the forums recently had this issue compiling dev-lang/vala, > and I have had related issues. I've had failing RAM corr

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge firefox-52.4.0 compile failure

On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2017-10-08, Mick wrote: >> This won't harm, although I would expect portage would complain and >> not run the emerge if downloads were corrupted somehow. > > True, but I couldn't think of anything else to try. I'm building > chromium now

Re: [gentoo-user] Error while starting Docker daemon

On Sun, 08 Oct 2017 19:10:48 +0100, Mick wrote: > From what I see above you are running btrfs. It may be worth compiling > in your kernel this module you have left out, because I've read > somewhere it prevents fs corruption (Rich seems to know a lot about > BTRFS, so I leave it to him to confirm

Re: [gentoo-user] Error while starting Docker daemon

On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Mick wrote: > > From what I see above you are running btrfs. It may be worth compiling in > your kernel this module you have left out, because I've read somewhere it > prevents fs corruption (Rich seems to know a lot about BTRFS, so I leave it to > him to confirm

[gentoo-user] Re: emerge firefox-52.4.0 compile failure

On 2017-10-08, Mick wrote: > On Sunday, 8 October 2017 18:02:43 BST Grant Edwards wrote: > >> I was afraid it might be failing RAM, but a second attempt failed in >> exactly the same way. I guess I'll delete the ebuild files and the >> source tarball to force a download and then try again. Same

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge firefox-52.4.0 compile failure

On Sunday, 8 October 2017 18:02:43 BST Grant Edwards wrote: > I was afraid it might be failing RAM, but a second attempt failed in > exactly the same way. I guess I'll delete the ebuild files and the > source tarball to force a download and then try again. This won't harm, although I would expec

Re: [gentoo-user] Error while starting Docker daemon

On Sunday, 8 October 2017 12:20:00 BST Hubert Hauser wrote: > On 07/10/17 18:50, Mick wrote: > > On Saturday, 7 October 2017 17:23:33 BST Hubert Hauser wrote: > >> I am using Gentoo as Host OS for Docker containers. > >> I have compiled > >> kernel using instructions on page > >> https://wiki.gento

[gentoo-user] Re: emerge firefox-52.4.0 compile failure

On 2017-10-08, Mick wrote: > On Sunday, 8 October 2017 03:51:41 BST Grant Edwards wrote: >> When I did my usual update today firefox 52.4.0 failed to build. >> There are thousands of compiler warnings in the build log, but the >> only thing I can find that looks like an error is this: [...] >> G

Re: [gentoo-user] Borg 1.1 is out, when can we expect it in the repos?

Hi, The proper to get it done is to submit an upgrade request to https://bugs.gentoo.org/ . And then even probably provide ebuild for maintainers to pick it up. Best regards, Viktar On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 7:36 PM, azarus wrote: > Hi, > > there's a new release of Borg (app-backup/borgbackup) ou

[gentoo-user] Borg 1.1 is out, when can we expect it in the repos?

Hi, there's a new release of Borg (app-backup/borgbackup) out, and I was wondering when it'd arrive in the Gentoo repos. I've tested it a bit on my Gentoo boxes (manually edited an ebuild for that) and it runs perfectly fine. Thanks for the information! Best regards, -- azarus email: aza...@pos

Re: [gentoo-user] Failed to emerge dev-libs/cudnn-6.0

s files must be downloaded > !!! manually.  See the comments in the ebuild for more information. > >  * Fetch failed for 'dev-libs/cudnn-6.0', Log file: >  *  '/var/log/portage/build/dev-libs/cudnn-6.0:20171008-103145.log' >  * The following files cannot be fetched for

Re: [gentoo-user] type keyboard problem

On 08/10/17 16:20, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 08:31:27 +0800 Bill Kenworthy wrote: >> Hi all, I have a laptop keyboard problem - it fails to reconnect the >> keyboard on opening after closing. >> >> MS Surface pro 4 with type keyboard. >> >> The keyboard connects correctl

[gentoo-user] Failed to emerge dev-libs/cudnn-6.0

s must be downloaded !!! manually.  See the comments in the ebuild for more information.  * Fetch failed for 'dev-libs/cudnn-6.0', Log file:  *  '/var/log/portage/build/dev-libs/cudnn-6.0:20171008-103145.log'  * The following files cannot be fetched for cudnn:  *    cudnn-8.0-li

[gentoo-user] Compilation failed: qtwidgets-5.9.2

Hi, compilation of qtwidgets failed. Is there a dependency currently missing in the ebuild? x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--no-undefined -fuse-ld=gold -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -shared -o libqgtk3.so .obj/main.o .obj/qgtk3dialoghelpers.o .obj/qgtk3menu.o .obj/qgtk3theme.o .

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge firefox-52.4.0 compile failure

On Sunday, 8 October 2017 03:51:41 BST Grant Edwards wrote: > When I did my usual update today firefox 52.4.0 failed to build. > There are thousands of compiler warnings in the build log, but the > only thing I can find that looks like an error is this: > > /usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ [...] >

Re: [gentoo-user] type keyboard problem

Hi, On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 08:31:27 +0800 Bill Kenworthy wrote: > Hi all, I have a laptop keyboard problem - it fails to reconnect the > keyboard on opening after closing. > > MS Surface pro 4 with type keyboard. > > The keyboard connects correctly on bootup or resume from hibernate (when > open). >