On 06/17/2018 03:05 PM, Mick wrote:
TBH I wouldn't select "Use only for resources on this connection",
I thought "Use only for resources on this connection" would enable (what
I know as) "split horizon", which is what I thought the OP wanted to do.
In other words route company traffic
On 2018-06-17 18:12, Mick wrote:
> From the fine manual:
>
> z Zap (delete) the new config file and continue.
So what do you do if the merge of this file is too hard and you want to
do it another time? The answer seems to be q (quit) or n (next), but
_nothing_ in the documentation says
On Sunday, 17 June 2018 18:12:11 BST Mick wrote:
> On Sunday, 17 June 2018 18:08:48 BST Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > On 2018-06-17 12:42, Andrew Udvare wrote:
> > > On 06/17/2018 12:17 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > > > What happens to files within the scope of CONFIG_PROTECT if I don't
> > > > execute
On Sunday, 17 June 2018 22:04:50 BST allan gottlieb wrote:
> (I have been offline for a few months and apologize if this has been
> covered.)
>
> I had not synced for about 3 months (fear of new, incompatible gnucash)
> but have now done so. Unsurprisingly my normal update world shows many
>
Hilco, I don't know if this thread was resolved - additional suggestions
posted below.
On Saturday, 9 June 2018 01:20:18 BST Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
> Let me give some more information, perhaps that will help.
>
> Setup without VPN
> $ ip route
> default via 192.168.151.1 dev eth0 proto static
(I have been offline for a few months and apologize if this has been
covered.)
I had not synced for about 3 months (fear of new, incompatible gnucash)
but have now done so. Unsurprisingly my normal update world shows many
entries and also unsurprising is a blocker (slot conflict). However, I
am
On Sunday, 17 June 2018 18:08:48 BST Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2018-06-17 12:42, Andrew Udvare wrote:
> > On 06/17/2018 12:17 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > > What happens to files within the scope of CONFIG_PROTECT if I don't
> > > execute dispatch-conf or any similar thingy? I have found the
> >
On 2018-06-17 12:42, Andrew Udvare wrote:
> On 06/17/2018 12:17 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > What happens to files within the scope of CONFIG_PROTECT if I don't
> > execute dispatch-conf or any similar thingy? I have found the
> > confusion the latter tool generates completely unsurmountable.
>
On 06/17/2018 12:17 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> What happens to files within the scope of CONFIG_PROTECT if I don't
> execute dispatch-conf or any similar thingy? I have found the confusion
> the latter tool generates completely unsurmountable.
I think the side-by-side merger is very easy for
What happens to files within the scope of CONFIG_PROTECT if I don't
execute dispatch-conf or any similar thingy? I have found the confusion
the latter tool generates completely unsurmountable.
What I'd prefer is the debian behavior: the package supplied config file
is simply saved under a
Hello,
I have some problem with some of my qemu/kvm guests running Fedora on a
Gentoo host where my Gentoo guests works without problem.
The problem that I have is that when I reboot (shutdown -r now) the
Fedora guest "loses" (ifconfig does not show a IP-address) their network
connections. The
11 matches
Mail list logo
