On 12/10/18 8:03 PM, Tsukasa Mcp_Reznor wrote:
Has anyone managed to get suspend/resume to work on diskless machines
using NFS as the root?
~blink~
I haven't tried to suspend / resume diskless machines. (I've not done
much with diskless machines, but it's on my to do list.)
But I don't thi
Has anyone managed to get suspend/resume to work on diskless machines using NFS
as the root?
Suspend works like normal, but resume hard locks, can't seem to get any error's
or anything as it's not sending to any log files naturally.
I have 3 machines currently running this setup, just trying t
On 12/10/2018 05:54 PM, Dale wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 16:33:10 -0500, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
>>
Not sure which country would be a reliable location though, I
wouldn't trust Western European countries either.
>>> USA is currently the best option since there ha
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 16:33:10 -0500, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
>
>>> Not sure which country would be a reliable location though, I
>>> wouldn't trust Western European countries either.
>> USA is currently the best option since there have never been proven
>> backdoors in made i
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 16:33:10 -0500, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
> > Not sure which country would be a reliable location though, I
> > wouldn't trust Western European countries either.
>
> USA is currently the best option since there have never been proven
> backdoors in made in usa hardware but plen
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 09:21:38 -0700, Grant Taylor wrote:
> > It sounds like ecryptfs would suit your needs best. As it works on
> > directories, you don't need separate mount points for each encrypted
> > directory.
>
> The last time I looked at eCryptFS it /did/ need mount points for
> acces
On 12/09/2018 01:57 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On December 9, 2018 6:23:07 PM UTC, "taii...@gmx.com" wrote:
>> On 12/07/2018 06:47 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>> On 07/12/2018 09:30, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> If you want to see all of the installed packages that are affected
Hi guys.
For some days now (can't say how many) I have been unable to get "emaint
sync -A". At the end, it says something like this:
sent 116.30K bytes received 23.70M bytes 266.06K bytes/sec
total size is 218.86M speedup is 9.19
* Manifest timestamp: 2018-12-10 18:38:44 UTC
* Valid OpenPGP
On 12/10/2018 02:25 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
It sounds like ecryptfs would suit your needs best. As it works on
directories, you don't need separate mount points for each encrypted
directory.
The last time I looked at eCryptFS it /did/ need mount points for
accessing the unencrypted contents.
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Dec 2018 20:38:25 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
>>> Is there an aspect of it that doesn't make sense? Or that you're
>>> uncomfortable with? Can I help alleviate the worry?
>> Just making sense of it. Trying to get it firmly in my mind. It just
>> seems to simple and e
On Monday, 10 December 2018 09:25:58 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Dec 2018 23:15:21 -0600, Dale wrote:
> > Well, I thought it may be simpler. Since I've never tried encryption
> > before, I don't know first hand how it works or what it takes to use the
> > files. I've read where people pa
On Sun, 9 Dec 2018 20:38:25 -0600, Dale wrote:
> > Is there an aspect of it that doesn't make sense? Or that you're
> > uncomfortable with? Can I help alleviate the worry?
>
> Just making sense of it. Trying to get it firmly in my mind. It just
> seems to simple and easy to move that much d
On Sun, 9 Dec 2018 23:15:21 -0600, Dale wrote:
> Well, I thought it may be simpler. Since I've never tried encryption
> before, I don't know first hand how it works or what it takes to use the
> files. I've read where people password protect their mobo, bootloader
> and their entire storage syst
13 matches
Mail list logo
