On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 21:56:14 +0200, n952...@web.de wrote:
> Apparently, rddtool got installed with harmless, default values, which,
> however, are not sufficient for monitorix. So, now I can accept the
> changes, and re-emerge rddtool - or probably, emerging monitorix will
> arrange for that.
On Tuesday, 4 June 2019 21:21:24 BST n952...@web.de wrote:
> Or, perhaps, that's where slots come in?
>
> If I try to install package A, which doesn't want whatever's in
>
>> > > +>=net-analyzer/rrdtool-1.6.0-r1 perl graph
>
> then, it'll use a new slot?
Not really. rrdtool-1.x will be in
Or, perhaps, that's where slots come in?
If I try to install package A, which doesn't want whatever's in
> > > +>=net-analyzer/rrdtool-1.6.0-r1 perl graph
then, it'll use a new slot?
I see that I have ebuilds for rrdtool-1.6.0 and rrdtool-1.7.0,1.7.1. and 1.7.2.
The one that runs when I
Henry V, Act III, 1598
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 04. Juni 2019 um 16:59 Uhr
> Von: "Grant Edwards"
> An: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Betreff: [gentoo-user] Re: Updating portage, continued
>
> On 2019-06-03, n952...@web.de wrote:
>
> > Fundamentally, autounmask seems like something I don't want
Okay, I think I got it. I saw that rrdtool was installed, so assumed
everything was okay. But, what I didn't realize is that - back then - I guess
I tried to install montorix and didn't notice, in the jungle of messages, that
the emerge was not successful.
Apparently, rddtool got installed
On Tue, 04 Jun 2019 13:13:39 -0400,
Mick wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Tuesday, 4 June 2019 16:01:13 BST Grant Edwards wrote:
> > On 2019-06-04, Mick wrote:
> > > I just downloaded my preferred medium of choice for installing Gentoo and
> > > discovered sysrescuecd now runs Linux Arch instead of Gentoo
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 16:38:14 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > Regardless, have you used the Arch based sysrescuecd to install
> > Gentoo and are there are any gotchas I should be aware of?
>
> You can use anything. I did use the Gentoo-based sysrescuecd once to
> install Gentoo, and I also
On Tuesday, 4 June 2019 16:01:13 BST Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2019-06-04, Mick wrote:
> > I just downloaded my preferred medium of choice for installing Gentoo and
> > discovered sysrescuecd now runs Linux Arch instead of Gentoo and to make
> > things worse it is running systemd instead of
On 2019-06-04, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2019-06-03, n952...@web.de wrote:
>
>> Fundamentally, autounmask seems like something I don't want to do,
>> at all. What happens if I just remove zz-autounmask? What do I
>> have to emerge to find out?
>
> It occurs to one that it would probably be
On 2019-06-04, Mick wrote:
> I just downloaded my preferred medium of choice for installing Gentoo and
> discovered sysrescuecd now runs Linux Arch instead of Gentoo and to make
> things worse it is running systemd instead of openrc. :-(
That's sad news indeed.
--
Grant Edwards
On 2019-06-03, n952...@web.de wrote:
> Fundamentally, autounmask seems like something I don't want to do,
> at all. What happens if I just remove zz-autounmask? What do I
> have to emerge to find out?
It occurs to one that it would probably be easier and faster to back
up user directories and
On Tuesday, 4 June 2019 14:10:13 BST Mick wrote:
> I just downloaded my preferred medium of choice for installing Gentoo and
> discovered sysrescuecd now runs Linux Arch instead of Gentoo and to make
> things worse it is running systemd instead of openrc. :-(
Oh, woe!
--
Regards,
Peter.
I found some hints for using non-Gentoo LiveCDs for installation over here
when I realized that my beloved SystemRescueCD switched over to Arch:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Installation_alternatives#Installation_from_non-Gentoo_LiveCDs
It seems though that these special advices (tar options when
Mick wrote:
> I just downloaded my preferred medium of choice for installing Gentoo and
> discovered sysrescuecd now runs Linux Arch instead of Gentoo and to make
> things worse it is running systemd instead of openrc. :-(
>
> A quick look in the forums did not reveal the reasons for this
On 04/06/2019 16:10, Mick wrote:
Regardless, have you used the Arch based sysrescuecd to install
Gentoo and are there are any gotchas I should be aware of?
You can use anything. I did use the Gentoo-based sysrescuecd once to
install Gentoo, and I also used an Ubuntu live DVD too. It doesn't
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 15:10, Mick wrote:
>
> I just downloaded my preferred medium of choice for installing Gentoo and
> discovered sysrescuecd now runs Linux Arch instead of Gentoo and to make
> things worse it is running systemd instead of openrc. :-(
>
> A quick look in the forums did not
I just downloaded my preferred medium of choice for installing Gentoo and
discovered sysrescuecd now runs Linux Arch instead of Gentoo and to make
things worse it is running systemd instead of openrc. :-(
A quick look in the forums did not reveal the reasons for this strategic
change.
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 08:40:48AM +0200, Manuel Rüger wrote:
> On 03.06.19 10:18, Petr Vaněk wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am wondering why we have so strict dependency to
> > ~app-emulation/runc-1.0.0_rc6_p20190216[apparmor?,seccomp?]
> > in docker ebuilds?
> >
> > I cannot build
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 00:14:01 +0200, n952...@web.de wrote:
> Fundamentally, autounmask seems like something I don't want to do, at
> all.
Why do you think that?
> What happens if I just remove zz-autounmask?
any USE flag changes required by installed ebuilds will be cancelled.
> What do I have
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 00:09:40 +0200, n952...@web.de wrote:
> I'm sorry, I'm not getting this yet. What if I just don't update these
> configuration files?
>
> dispatch-conf tells me, for /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords:
>
> --- /etc/portage/package.use/zz-autounmask 2018-03-12
>
On Monday, 3 June 2019 23:14:01 BST n952...@web.de wrote:
> Fundamentally, autounmask seems like something I don't want to do, at all.
> What happens if I just remove zz-autounmask? What do I have to emerge to
> find out?
@world with --newuse and --pretend.
> I currently have:
>
> $ cat
On Monday, 3 June 2019 23:09:40 BST n952...@web.de wrote:
> I'm sorry, I'm not getting this yet. What if I just don't update these
> configuration files?
>
> dispatch-conf tells me, for /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords:
>
> --- /etc/portage/package.use/zz-autounmask 2018-03-12
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
