krgn wrote:
hi
I have a question concerning my modular X installation. I did this
according to the gentoo guide here
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/modular-x-howto.xml.
now, I have synced again, and a lot of blocks are coming up and I am not
sure really how to solve this. These are
Michael Sullivan wrote:
I'm concerned. When I got out of the shower just now and came to check
my email, I didn't have any. Concerned that sendmail might not be
running, I ps'd for it:
[snip]
Is there a way to make sure that unauthorized people are not sending
mail through my domain?
I
Philip Webb wrote:
Yes, a short turn with another distro soon reminds how good Gentoo is.
A couple of weeks ago, I wanted to update the OS in my back-up machine,
which had Mandrake 10.0 (early 2004) working adequately when needed
& is too slow & infrequently used to install Gentoo.
[snip]
"Ho
Martin Ullrich wrote:
Hi again!
lspci lists all my devices (PCI-X Controller (Intel 925X chipset and
ICH6 Southbridge) and my two ethernet cards):
...
:01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88W8310
and 88W8000G [Libertas] 802.11g client chipset (rev 07)
...
:02:0
Holly Bostick wrote:
This was a simple emerge, so I hope I didn't bork it myself; I did
forget to create a 'files' directory in the overlay folder, but since
there were no files, I can't think that that would be the problem.
I could be wrong, though, especially since it works under KDE. Why wou
Nick Rout wrote:
OK once again the ebuild is attached, it now creates a desktop file in
/usr/share/applications/ and pops the .xpm icon file into
/usr/share/pixmaps/. This is where gentoo likes these things to be.
Those of you who have expressed an interest in this game please try it
out. If it
Joseph wrote:
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 13:38 -0400, Willie Wong wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 10:02:08AM -0600, Joseph wrote:
I have a device with an IP 192.168.0.1 which I need to access via
browser.
My PC gets an IP via DHCP from the router.
What should I use for gateway? I've tired 192.168.0
Markus Döbele wrote:
Can't the rest be automated too?
I mean creating the directories
and to check first if portage is installed?
Would be easier for the users.
Then a link should be created in PATH thet you can type laby everywhere.
Once the ebuild is officially in the portage tree, it is al
A. Khattri wrote:
I had a Maxtor drive die just after the one-year warranty expired. We had
one server with Maxtors that died twice in one year.
Because of this, we now have a "Seagate-only" policy for hard-drives -
they may cost a bit more but they're reliable and many come with a three
year wa
Nick Rout wrote:
I know I should upload this to bugs.gentoo.org, but as we are in the
middle of a thread i thought I'd load it here for anyone interested to
try (and to criticise)
Please be gentle with me, this is my first ebuild.
The ebuild is attached, as is the small startup script. The way
Zac Medico wrote:
[snip]
>>>
>>
>>Once the buffer fills up would you expect it to work
>>fine at 1.2MB/s? I
>>wish I had kept the logs, but it was extremely slow
>>(much slower than
>>1.2). I was copying a series of ~70MB files over and
>>it would work fine
>>on about the first 5 or so files befo
Richard Fish wrote:
> Alec Shaner wrote:
>
>
>>Once the buffer fills up would you expect it to work fine at 1.2MB/s? I
>>wish I had kept the logs, but it was extremely slow (much slower than
>>1.2). I was copying a series of ~70MB files over and it would work fine
&
Richard Fish wrote:
> Alec Shaner wrote:
>
>
>>I recently purchased a WD 160GB external USB drive and can't get it to
>>perform reliably on my server. It works fine when connected to my
>>workstation machine (a P4P800 ASUS MB with USB 2.0 support). The server
>
Mark Knecht wrote:
> The typical reason for low performance AND high CPU is that the
> controller (in this case probably the USB interface chip) isn't
> enabled for DMA. It looked like you have the right drivers loaded so
> possibly the USB chip is not a major brand name? Sorry I didn't read
> earl
Mark Knecht wrote:
[snip]
> My point was really NOT that the concept of USE flags is unimportant.
> It's that the values that are set for each flag is not overly
> important for the average user. Like most things in life probably 90%
> of the Gentoo boxes out there use some common small set of fl
15 matches
Mail list logo
