On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:21 AM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>> Yes, that's what it is. I too have USE="-xcb" for libX11
>
> I have xcb use flag enabled and haven't encountered any problems (and
> nothing had to be rebuilt). libX11-1.2.2
>
>
Ma
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:21 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Yes, that's what it is. I too have USE="-xcb" for libX11
I have xcb use flag enabled and haven't encountered any problems (and
nothing had to be rebuilt). libX11-1.2.2
On Tuesday 15 September 2009 12:22:59 Mike Kazantsev wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:58:58 +0200
>
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Tuesday 15 September 2009 09:49:39 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > > On 15 Sep, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > > > To completely get rid of libxcb-xlib.so references, please read
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:34:32 +0200 (CEST), Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > I had some breakage, but nothing significant. I only realised anything
> > was wrong because emerge @preserved-rebuild failed on most packages,
> > so I then RTFMed, ran the commands from that web page and all was
> > fine. Konq
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:58:58 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 September 2009 09:49:39 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > On 15 Sep, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> > > To completely get rid of libxcb-xlib.so references, please read :
> > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/libxcb-1.4-upgrad
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:34:37 +0200
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > I'm following the recipe on
> > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/libxcb-1.4-upgrade-guide.xml
> >
> > which results in
> >
> > emerge -v1 -j4 x11-proto/xcb-proto x11-libs/libxcb
> > emerge -v1 -j4 x11-proto/xproto x11
Ward Poelmans wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:51, Jorma Airola wrote:
>
>
>> Same here, no breakage on my laptop or desktop.
>>
>> I have used dev-util/lafilefixer few time with "--justfixit" option
>> few times,could that be the reason for smooth upgrade?
>>
>
> Did you remove the l
On Tuesday 15 September 2009 11:01:11 Ward Poelmans wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:51, Jorma Airola wrote:
> > Same here, no breakage on my laptop or desktop.
> >
> > I have used dev-util/lafilefixer few time with "--justfixit" option
> > few times,could that be the reason for smooth upgrad
On Dienstag 15 September 2009, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 15 Sep, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:58:58 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> The gods must be favouring me for a change. I'm completely unaffected
> >> by this upgrade :-)
> >
> > I had some breakage, but nothing significa
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:51, Jorma Airola wrote:
> Same here, no breakage on my laptop or desktop.
>
> I have used dev-util/lafilefixer few time with "--justfixit" option
> few times,could that be the reason for smooth upgrade?
Did you remove the lib "libxcb-xlib.so" or is it still there?
W
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 September 2009 09:49:39 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
>> On 15 Sep, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>
>
>
>>> To completely get rid of libxcb-xlib.so references, please read :
>>> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/libxcb-1.4-upgrade-guide.xml
>>>
>>
On 15 Sep, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:58:58 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> The gods must be favouring me for a change. I'm completely unaffected
>> by this upgrade :-)
>
> I had some breakage, but nothing significant. I only realised anything
> was wrong because emerge @prese
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:58:58 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> The gods must be favouring me for a change. I'm completely unaffected
> by this upgrade :-)
I had some breakage, but nothing significant. I only realised anything
was wrong because emerge @preserved-rebuild failed on most packages, so I
t
On Tuesday 15 September 2009 09:49:39 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 15 Sep, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > To completely get rid of libxcb-xlib.so references, please read :
> > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/libxcb-1.4-upgrade-guide.xml
>
> Since my browser got broken, too, this took some ti
On 15 Sep, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:38:41 +0200 (CEST), Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
>> The above URL doesn't help either,
>> so any help to 'survive' is appreciated.
>
> Did you read the elog message when you emerged the new version?
Yes, I did ... but
>
> libxcb-xlib.so is n
On Tuesday 15 September 2009 09:38:41 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 15 Sep, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > as I have just bitten by it, have a look at
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285004
> >
> > before upgrading to x11-libs/libxcb-1.4 (1.4.-r1)
> >
> > since this breaks any X11-
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:38:41 +0200 (CEST), Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> The above URL doesn't help either,
> so any help to 'survive' is appreciated.
Did you read the elog message when you emerged the new version?
libxcb-xlib.so is no longer shipped by ${PN} but was kept on your system
While your
On 15 Sep, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as I have just bitten by it, have a look at
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285004
>
> before upgrading to x11-libs/libxcb-1.4 (1.4.-r1)
>
> since this breaks any X11-application (including your
> browser to look at the URL above)
>
> Such an
Hi,
as I have just bitten by it, have a look at
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285004
before upgrading to x11-libs/libxcb-1.4 (1.4.-r1)
since this breaks any X11-application (including your
browser to look at the URL above)
Such an update should be DOUBLY MASKED !!!
And the messages co
19 matches
Mail list logo
