On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
Jorge Almeida wrote:
I would like the default permissions for directories created by a
particular user to be 1775. Is there some way to achieve this? I think
umask doesn't deal with the sticky bit.
umask is a MASK. The application suggests permissio
Jorge Almeida wrote:
> I would like the default permissions for directories created by a
> particular user to be 1775. Is there some way to achieve this? I think
> umask doesn't deal with the sticky bit.
>
umask is a MASK. The application suggests permissions on new files,
umask turns off the bits
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 14:44 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Albert Hopkins wrote:
>
> >
> > You should probably use ACLs. They may also obviate the need to set
> > directory sticky bits to begin with.
> I know, but learning ACL will not be a minor task (I think).
POSIX ACLs ar
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Albert Hopkins wrote:
You should probably use ACLs. They may also obviate the need to set
directory sticky bits to begin with.
I know, but learning ACL will not be a minor task (I think).
You did not explain why you want to do this, but you also want to
investigate whet
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 08:17 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> I would like the default permissions for directories created by a
> particular user to be 1775. Is there some way to achieve this? I think
> umask doesn't deal with the sticky bit.
You should probably use ACLs. They may also obviate the n
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Norberto Bensa wrote:
Are your users running Windows? Is so, you can configure Samba to create
directories with sticky bit set.
No, linux-only.
Regards,
Norberto
Thanks,
Jorge
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Jorge Almeida wrote:
> > What's the reason you want to set the sticky bit for thaqt user? With
> > some more info, maybe we can come up with an alternative
>
> Just to allow users of a certain group to write to common directories
> (not always the same, and which might be created by anyone of those
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 28 March 2007, Jorge Almeida wrote:
Could you rig it so these users will only create new dirs in a certain
place, like /tmp or /var/tmp? If so, would a cron job running every 10
minutes or so running this command be good enough?
find $TMP_
On Wednesday 28 March 2007, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> > What's the reason you want to set the sticky bit for thaqt user?
> > With some more info, maybe we can come up with an alternative
>
> Just to allow users of a certain group to write to common directories
> (not always the same, and which might b
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 28 March 2007, Jorge Almeida wrote:
I would like the default permissions for directories created by a
particular user to be 1775. Is there some way to achieve this? I
think umask doesn't deal with the sticky bit.
I did a few simple tests
On Wednesday 28 March 2007, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> I would like the default permissions for directories created by a
> particular user to be 1775. Is there some way to achieve this? I
> think umask doesn't deal with the sticky bit.
I did a few simple tests here, I also find that umask doesn't like
I would like the default permissions for directories created by a
particular user to be 1775. Is there some way to achieve this? I think
umask doesn't deal with the sticky bit.
--
Jorge Almeida
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
12 matches
Mail list logo
