Hi folks,
Can someone tell me what this means?
r...@smoker / # emerge -p --depclean
* Always study the list of packages to be cleaned for any obvious
* mistakes. Packages that are part of the world set will always
* be kept. They can be manually added to this set with
* `emerge
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 13:43:13 Dale wrote:
Hi folks,
Can someone tell me what this means?
r...@smoker / # emerge -p --depclean
* Always study the list of packages to be cleaned for any obvious
* mistakes. Packages that are part of the world set will always
* be kept. They
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Can someone tell me what this means?
r...@smoker / # emerge -p --depclean
* Always study the list of packages to be cleaned for any obvious
* mistakes. Packages that are part of the world set will always
* be
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Can someone tell me what this means?
r...@smoker / # emerge -p --depclean
* Always study the list of packages to be cleaned for any obvious
* mistakes. Packages that are part of the world
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 14:45:36 Dale wrote:
I'll report back if it continues after all this. Thanks to both Alan
and Mark on this one. I was getting drunk going around in circles with
this.
Let us know if USE=python really is the solution. I've been meaning to write
this up at
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:45 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Can someone tell me what this means?
r...@smoker / # emerge -p --depclean
* Always study the list of packages to be cleaned for
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:45 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
Possibly scribus isn't compatible with python-2.6? The few times I've
run into this with depclean I've removed the app (scribus in this
case) cleaned up the machine with depclean
Dale wrote:
Yes, I ran python-updater after the last python upgrade which was a week
or so ago. I just hadn't ran --depclean yet. Needless to say, OOo just
had to be recompiled too. It always does. Usually, about a week later,
they have a upgrade for OOo which means I get to warm
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:45 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
Possibly scribus isn't compatible with python-2.6? The few times I've
run into this with depclean I've removed the app
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
You actually compile OO? Wow! OO-bin for me. Couple of minutes and
it's installed.
Same here. I compiled it for a long time (double meaning!), but when I
realized the amount of time spent compiling it was greater than the
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
You actually compile OO? Wow! OO-bin for me. Couple of minutes and
it's installed.
Same here. I compiled it for a long time (double
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
You actually compile OO? Wow! OO-bin for me. Couple of minutes and
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:40:05 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
Same here. I compiled it for a long time (double meaning!), but when I
realized the amount of time spent compiling it was greater than the
amount of time spent using it... I decided to go oo-bin as well.
You spend time compiling OOo? I
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:40:05 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
Same here. I compiled it for a long time (double meaning!), but when I
realized the amount of time spent compiling it was greater than the
amount of time spent using
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Mark Knecht
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
You actually compile OO? Wow! OO-bin for me. Couple of minutes and
it's installed.
Same here. I
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 11:29:10 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
Sure, of course I'm not staring at the gcc lines scrolling by, but it
gets in the way of compiling other things and causes unnecessary (in
my case) CPU and power load for a program I use only rarely.
Especially on slower machines, like my
17 matches
Mail list logo
