Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 21/04/2023 19:29, Dale wrote:
>> I ran into a buggy driver a while back and once I synced and upgraded,
>> the old one was gone. So, I started keeping a local copy just in case.
>> Of course, as long as I keep a older driver to fall back on, it won't
>> break
On 21/04/2023 19:29, Dale wrote:
I ran into a buggy driver a while back and once I synced and upgraded,
the old one was gone. So, I started keeping a local copy just in case.
Of course, as long as I keep a older driver to fall back on, it won't
break anymore.
It will break with kernel and x.org
On 04/06/2017 10:03 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 04/05/2017 05:15 PM, Alan Grimes wrote:
>> I'm still running on my old kernel as I re-build my system, Nvidia
>> drivers just barfed
>
> 381.09 was released today which supports kernel 4.10. But it might take
> a while until it's in portage.
>
On 04/05/2017 05:15 PM, Alan Grimes wrote:
I'm still running on my old kernel as I re-build my system, Nvidia
drivers just barfed
381.09 was released today which supports kernel 4.10. But it might take
a while until it's in portage.
In general, I stick with LTS kernels ("Long Term
On 15/12/13 06:39, »Q« wrote:
It looks to me as if the removal of nvidia-drivers-325.15 was a
mistake, but I've got a lot going on in the meat world right now, and I
don't want to file a bug if I've simply gotten confused.
I run mostly stable amd64. I have 325.15 installed, and nothing
On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 14:24:58 +0200
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15/12/13 06:39, »Q« wrote:
It looks to me as if the removal of nvidia-drivers-325.15 was a
mistake, but I've got a lot going on in the meat world right now,
and I don't want to file a bug if I've simply gotten
On Friday 02 August 2013 02:38:37 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 01/08/13 23:02, Alexander Puchmayr wrote:
Hi there,
When I start X (or start kdm), I get a segmentation fault and no X.
[...]
Kernel 3.8.18, nvidia-drivers 304.88 (Last to support the GeForce7600,
newer drivers do not
On 01/08/13 23:02, Alexander Puchmayr wrote:
Hi there,
When I start X (or start kdm), I get a segmentation fault and no X.
[...]
Kernel 3.8.18, nvidia-drivers 304.88 (Last to support the GeForce7600, newer
drivers do not support it any more).
Any ideas?
Try manually rolling your own ebuild
On 26/05/13 12:12, Dale wrote:
[...]
The problem. After I am logged into KDE for a good while, like several
hours to maybe a day or so, the kicker thingy at the bottom locks up
tight. I can't switch desktops, clock stops working, can't click the K
menu thingy either. Everything in the kicker
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 26/05/13 12:12, Dale wrote:
[...]
The problem. After I am logged into KDE for a good while, like several
hours to maybe a day or so, the kicker thingy at the bottom locks up
tight. I can't switch desktops, clock stops working, can't click the K
menu thingy
On 26/05/13 15:14, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 26/05/13 12:12, Dale wrote:
[...]
The problem. After I am logged into KDE for a good while, like several
hours to maybe a day or so, the kicker thingy at the bottom locks up
tight. I can't switch desktops, clock stops working, can't
On 02/05/2013 08:57 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
walt w41...@gmail.com [13-02-06 04:51]:
On 02/05/2013 06:56 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
when using vanilla kernel 3.7.5 (appropiate kernel headers installed)
emergeing nvidia-drivers 313.18 works fine.
As soon vanilla kernel 3.7.6
On 05/02/13 16:56, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
when using vanilla kernel 3.7.5 (appropiate kernel headers installed)
emergeing nvidia-drivers 313.18 works fine.
As soon vanilla kernel 3.7.6 are installed the emerge process fails
because the kernel version couldnt be determined.
Both times
On 02/05/2013 06:56 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
when using vanilla kernel 3.7.5 (appropiate kernel headers installed)
emergeing nvidia-drivers 313.18 works fine.
As soon vanilla kernel 3.7.6 are installed the emerge process fails
because the kernel version couldnt be determined.
walt w41...@gmail.com [13-02-06 04:51]:
On 02/05/2013 06:56 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
when using vanilla kernel 3.7.5 (appropiate kernel headers installed)
emergeing nvidia-drivers 313.18 works fine.
As soon vanilla kernel 3.7.6 are installed the emerge process fails
because
On 27/01/13 02:06, staticsafe wrote:
I just grabbed vanilla 3.7.4 from kernel.org, the kernel build itself
went fine but when I did a modules-rebuild, the nvidia module failed to
build. As requested by the error message:
output of `emerge --info '=x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-304.64'`:
On 01/26/2013 04:06 PM, staticsafe wrote:
I just grabbed vanilla 3.7.4 from kernel.org, the kernel build itself
went fine but when I did a modules-rebuild, the nvidia module failed to
build.
Yes, this happens fairly often with proprietary drivers. Once upon a time
I would spend hours hacking
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:49:39AM -0400, Philip Webb wrote
I don't suspend on my machines: Nvidia is running on my desktop PC.
I live in a condo building, with a separate electric meter for each
suite. I'm conserving a valuable resource, i.e. my bank account G, by
shutting down the machine
On 22/06/12 15:30, walt wrote:
On 06/21/2012 12:47 PM, walt wrote:
On 06/20/2012 07:46 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 20/06/12 17:04, walt wrote:
On 06/18/2012 02:29 AM, Philip Webb wrote:
120615 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
2012/6/15 Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net
after installing Kernel
On 18.06.2012 11:29, Philip Webb wrote:
I've updated to the latest testing 302.17 it's working ok so far.
Just wanted to let you know, that there is a bug that affects lots of
people with 302.xx: X-console-switch and resume-from-suspend are broken.
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:47:08 -0400
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 07:04:13AM -0700, walt wrote
I just did the same update. I thought at first everything was okay,
then I ran glxgears, which runs at 1/5 normal speed. Going back to
295.59 fixed it. Very
120621 Daniel Troeder wrote:
On 18.06.2012 11:29, Philip Webb wrote:
I've updated to the latest testing 302.17 it's working ok so far.
that there is a bug that affects lots of people with 302.xx:
X-console-switch and resume-from-suspend are broken.
Philip Webb:
Commenting on the other msgs re Glxgears, (1) which pkg is it in ?
hafi@i5_64 ~ $ equery b glxgears
* Searching for glxgears ...
x11-apps/mesa-progs-8.0.1 (/usr/bin/glxgears)
Hartmut
--
Usenet-ABC-Wiki http://www.usenet-abc.de/wiki/
Von Usern fuer User :-)
On Thursday 21 June 2012 04:28:35 João Matos wrote:
I've heard that this http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/?k=downloads
is a good option
Portage includes app-benchmarks/phoronix-test-suite but it's keyworded.
On this box 21 other packages need installing first, including PHP, MySQL
and
On 06/20/2012 07:46 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 20/06/12 17:04, walt wrote:
On 06/18/2012 02:29 AM, Philip Webb wrote:
120615 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
2012/6/15 Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net
after installing Kernel 3.4 , Nvidia-drivers 295.49 wouldn't compile.
I can see that 295.53
On 06/18/2012 02:29 AM, Philip Webb wrote:
120615 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
2012/6/15 Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net
after installing Kernel 3.4 , Nvidia-drivers 295.49 wouldn't compile.
I can see that 295.53 and 295.59 are available. Use 295.59.
I've updated to the latest testing 302.17
On 20/06/12 17:04, walt wrote:
On 06/18/2012 02:29 AM, Philip Webb wrote:
120615 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
2012/6/15 Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net
after installing Kernel 3.4 , Nvidia-drivers 295.49 wouldn't compile.
I can see that 295.53 and 295.59 are available. Use 295.59.
I've
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 07:04:13AM -0700, walt wrote
I just did the same update. I thought at first everything was okay,
then I ran glxgears, which runs at 1/5 normal speed. Going back to
295.59 fixed it. Very puzzling, since there was nothing unusual in
Xorg.0.log.
What does glxgears
*glxgears is not a benchmark.
http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Glxgears_is_not_a_Benchmark
I've heard that this http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/?k=downloads is a
good option*, but I still didn't have time to try it.
2012/6/20 Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 05:29:13AM -0400, Philip Webb wrote
I've updated to the latest testing 302.17 it's working ok so far.
AOL Me too /AOL. Thanks for starting the thread, and giving the
answer. I ran an update last night, and X wouldn't restart today. I
remembered the thread, keyworded
120615 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
2012/6/15 Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net
after installing Kernel 3.4 , Nvidia-drivers 295.49 wouldn't compile.
I can see that 295.53 and 295.59 are available. Use 295.59.
I've updated to the latest testing 302.17 it's working ok so far.
--
On 15/06/12 18:14, Philip Webb wrote:
120615 microcai wrote:
2012/6/15 Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net
after installing Kernel 3.4 , Nvidia-drivers 295.49 wouldn't compile.
The solution (via Google + Launchpad bugzilla) is to copy 4 header files
from /usr/src/linux/arch/arm/include/asm to
On 12/04/12 11:06, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 04/12/2012 09:09:16 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
That was the previous laptop. This current one has an ATI card and I
use ati drivers rather than fglrx for the same reason.
What's the difference (in performance) between fglrx and xf86-video-ati ?
Am 11.04.2012 23:14, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
Unless you need to use the console (nvidia-drivers don't provide a KMS
fb console,) there's no reason to use Nouveau at the moment. The binary
drivers perform better and save much more energy. With Nouveau, your
GPU will be running full-on
On 12/04/12 14:14, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 11.04.2012 23:14, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
Unless you need to use the console (nvidia-drivers don't provide a KMS
fb console,) there's no reason to use Nouveau at the moment. The binary
drivers perform better and save much more energy. With
On 11/04/12 23:38, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Just being curious:
I use my main workstation primarily for work.
Ok, gnome3 needs some graphic acceleration, aside from that I can only
think of the occasional mythfrontend running on my desktop.
I consider to chose nouveau drivers instead of
Am 11.04.2012 23:14, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
What are your recommendations?
Unless you need to use the console (nvidia-drivers don't provide a
KMS fb console,) there's no reason to use Nouveau at the moment. The
binary drivers perform better and save much more energy. With
Nouveau,
Am 11.04.2012 23:14, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
Unless you need to use the console (nvidia-drivers don't provide a KMS
fb console,) there's no reason to use Nouveau at the moment. The binary
drivers perform better and save much more energy. With Nouveau, your
GPU will be running full-on
On 12/04/12 00:29, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 11.04.2012 23:14, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
What are your recommendations?
Unless you need to use the console (nvidia-drivers don't provide a
KMS fb console,) there's no reason to use Nouveau at the moment. The
binary drivers perform better
Am 11.04.2012 23:38, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
Note however that it's not obvious which version of nvidia-drivers to
use. NVidia provides various different series of drivers. The drivers
are versioned 96.*, 173.* and 295.*, and each version series is intended
for different cards.
If you
On 12/04/12 00:32, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 11.04.2012 23:14, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
Unless you need to use the console (nvidia-drivers don't provide a KMS
fb console,) there's no reason to use Nouveau at the moment. The binary
drivers perform better and save much more energy. With
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 12/04/12 00:32, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 11.04.2012 23:14, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
Unless you need to use the console (nvidia-drivers don't provide a KMS
fb console,) there's no reason to use Nouveau at the moment. The binary
drivers perform better and
On 12/04/12 01:55, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 12/04/12 00:32, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 11.04.2012 23:14, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
Unless you need to use the console (nvidia-drivers don't provide a KMS
fb console,) there's no reason to use Nouveau at the moment. The
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 12/04/12 01:55, Dale wrote:
Somewhat related question. I use the Nvidia drivers here and have not
had any issues in a while. How does one use VESA if the Nvidia drivers
fail? One used to change it in xorg.conf but most don't have a
xorg.conf any more.
You
On 12/04/12 02:43, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 12/04/12 01:55, Dale wrote:
Somewhat related question. I use the Nvidia drivers here and have not
had any issues in a while. How does one use VESA if the Nvidia drivers
fail? One used to change it in xorg.conf but most don't have a
On Friday 24 April 2009 01:59:59 walt wrote:
Whenever I have the same problem it's because I've done a 'make clean' or
equivalent in /usr/src/linux, or more likely because a newer version of
the kernel sources has been installed but I haven't yet built the newer
kernel.
It's possible that
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 23 April 2009 07:43:20 Xavier Parizet wrote:
I think the MAKEOPTS was not the problem, but only the make prepare... I
remember to see before that sometimes, the kernel source tree is no
more up-to-date with the last kernel build, so when i see that problems,
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 10:16:37AM +0600, Mike Kazantsev wrote:
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:43:21 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
KH gentoo-user at konstantinhansen.de writes:
Q: Why is top-posting evil?
A: .backwards read don't humans because
OK. Everyone that hates top
Momesso Andrea wrote:
I'm kinda bored of the please no top posting replies... Couldn't we
ask the infra staff (or whoever runs this mailing list) to periodically
send a guidelines message to all the subscribers, like it happens in
other mailing lists.
This way we could soimply ask
On Thursday 02 April 2009, Dale wrote:
Mick wrote:
How can we forget ... sigh
:D
But I may take out something important. :/ I try to do that but I am
getting older. I forget.
I guess I made a lasting impression, albeit bad I guess.
Nah! Far from it, not to me anyway. :)
--
On Thursday 02 April 2009 06:16:37 Mike Kazantsev wrote:
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:43:21 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
KH gentoo-user at konstantinhansen.de writes:
Q: Why is top-posting evil?
A: .backwards read don't humans because
OK. Everyone that hates top posting please
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 02 April 2009 06:16:37 Mike Kazantsev wrote:
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:43:21 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
KH gentoo-user at konstantinhansen.de writes:
Q: Why is top-posting evil?
A: .backwards read don't humans because
On Thursday 02 April 2009, Dale wrote:
Over time, I agree with bottom posting. It just makes sense.
So does pruning endless lines of umpteen previous messages that have been
answered and are not relevant to the latest message response ... (I am
looking at you here Dale to make us proud next
Mick wrote:
So does pruning endless lines of umpteen previous messages that have been
answered and are not relevant to the latest message response ... (I am
looking at you here Dale to make us proud next time). ;-)
How can we forget ... sigh
:D
But I may take out something
KH gentoo-user at konstantinhansen.de writes:
Q: Why is top-posting evil?
A: .backwards read don't humans because
Well, about 98% of linux folks like the
ease of reading and following the thread
down the posting. It's also just a standard
convention, not often follow in the windoz
world.
James wrote:
KH gentoo-user at konstantinhansen.de writes:
Q: Why is top-posting evil?
A: .backwards read don't humans because
Well, about 98% of linux folks like the
ease of reading and following the thread
down the posting. It's also just a standard
convention, not often
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:43:21 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
KH gentoo-user at konstantinhansen.de writes:
Q: Why is top-posting evil?
A: .backwards read don't humans because
OK. Everyone that hates top posting please reply with a +1. I'll start.
+1 No top posting
Volker Armin Hemmann volker.armin.hemmann at tu-clausthal.de writes:
NV11 [GeForce2 MX/MX 400] NV34 [GeForce FX 5200]
that is not true. Both cards are still supported by nvidia drivers.
The FX card ist even supported by the latest drivers!
Yep I got this one(FX 5200) working with the
James wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann volker.armin.hemmann at tu-clausthal.de writes:
NV11 [GeForce2 MX/MX 400] NV34 [GeForce FX 5200]
that is not true. Both cards are still supported by nvidia drivers.
The FX card ist even supported by the latest drivers!
Yep I
James wrote:
I'm using 2.6.24-gentoo-r3.
Emerging (1 of 1) x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-71.86.01
snip
*** Unable to determine the target kernel version. ***
Do you have the /usr/src/linux symlink pointing to the kernel source
tree you are using?
Be lucky,
Neil
--
This message has
Neil Walker neil at ep.mine.nu writes:
Utterly wrong. ;) The GeForce2 is supported by the 96.43.xx series of
drivers and the FX5200 is still supported by the unified driver. :)
YES the 96.43.05 version compiled and is working. How/where did you
learn which nvidia cards are supported by
quoth the James:
Neil Walker neil at ep.mine.nu writes:
Utterly wrong. ;) The GeForce2 is supported by the 96.43.xx series of
drivers and the FX5200 is still supported by the unified driver. :)
YES the 96.43.05 version compiled and is working. How/where did you
learn which nvidia cards are
darren kirby bulliver at badcomputer.org writes:
http://www.nvidia.com/object/unix.html
Each driver has its own page with a supported products link on the left
side.
Ah.
very cool
thx
James
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
James wrote:
How/where did you learn which nvidia cards are supported by which version of the
nvidia-drivers?
It's in the README file in the package. ;)
Be lucky,
Neil
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
--
James wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann volker.armin.hemmann at tu-clausthal.de writes:
NV11 [GeForce2 MX/MX 400] NV34 [GeForce FX 5200]
that is not true. Both cards are still supported by nvidia drivers.
The FX card ist even supported by the latest drivers!
Yep I got this one(FX 5200)
You did check the new and updated nvidia guide?
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/nvidia-guide.xml
Regards,
Marc
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
66 matches
Mail list logo
