Re: [gentoo-user] Re: -march=auto

maxim wexler writes: > > If so, Daniel's tip about 'gcc -Q --help=target -march=native' will give > > you the exact options to use. > See attachment please. Some stuff is enabled, some disabled, some blank. Try this: gcc -Q --help=target -march=native > /tmp/gccoptions.native gcc -Q --help=targe

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: -march=auto

> If so, Daniel's > tip about 'gcc -Q --help=target -march=native' will give > you the exact > options to use. > >     Wonko > > See attachment please. Some stuff is enabled, some disabled, some blank. And -march=prescott !? Maxim

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: -march=auto

maxim wexler writes: > --- On Thu, 5/21/09, Alex Schuster wrote: > > But it suggests using -march=k8 - isn't that a 64-bit-only > > thing? I'm not > > For an 900A w/intel Atom? No, I have an AMD Athlon(tm) Dual Core Processor 4850e. > This is what I get: > > Warning: Your compiler supports the

[gentoo-user] Re: -march=auto

Daniel Iliev writes: > Alex Schuster wrote: > > BTW, is there a possibility to let gcc tell what flags it will > > actually use with -march=auto? > > gcc -Q --help=target -march=native Cool, thanks! Wonko

[gentoo-user] Re: -march=auto

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 maxim wexler wrote: > > For an 900A w/intel Atom? > > This is what I get: > > Warning: Your compiler supports the -march=native option which you > may prefer If you use this, then you 1) must be using >=sys-devel/gcc-4.2, and 2) will always have th

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: -march=auto

--- On Thu, 5/21/09, Alex Schuster wrote: > From: Alex Schuster > Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: -march=auto > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Received: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 12:30 PM > I just wrote: > > > > Could also perhaps try -march=auto if you're >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: -march=auto

Peter Humphrey writes: > On Thursday 21 May 2009 20:30:19 Alex Schuster wrote: > > Paul Hartman just posted a link to a script that seems to do what I was > > looking for in the "[OT]eee 900a intel atom is what processor family?" > > thread: > > It's th

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: -march=auto

On Thursday 21 May 2009 20:30:19 Alex Schuster wrote: > Paul Hartman just posted a link to a script that seems to do what I was > looking for in the "[OT]eee 900a intel atom is what processor family?" > thread: It's the same thread as your own message

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: -march=auto

On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Alex Schuster wrote: > Paul Hartman just posted a link to a script that seems to do what I was > looking for in the "[OT]eee 900a intel atom is what processor family?" > thread: > > But it suggests using -march=k8 - isn'

[gentoo-user] Re: -march=auto

I just wrote: > > Could also perhaps try -march=auto if you're using a version of GCC > > that supports it. Oh, it's -march=native. > BTW, is there a possibility to let gcc tell what flags it will actually > use with -march=auto? Paul Hartman just posted a link to a script that seems to do what