Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:39:09 + (UTC), Michael Schmarck wrote:
You have a problem to which you do not know the solution, so how are
you supposed to know what is important and what is not?
As it seems, I knew what was not important. Just have a
(gramps:) I remember the good old days when a good clean old-fashioned
fight to the death would sort these things out, and the winner would be
right. Now we have reasoning, such a bore.
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Monday 31 March 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
So you found his post unhelpful,
You disagree? You think that he was helpful with his KDE comment?
I would be very surprised if he thought it was helpful. It wasn't
written to be helpful. It was written to provoke a giggle, or perhaps
nothing
On Mon, 31. Mar, ionut cucu spammed my inbox with
(gramps:) I remember the good old days when a good clean old-fashioned
fight to the death would sort these things out, and the winner would be
right. Now we have reasoning, such a bore.
Good one. I lol'ed^^
--
thenybble.de/blog/ -- four bits
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 01:32:05PM +0200, Penguin Lover Alan McKinnon squawked:
on second thoughts, /me wonders if I might not be in Michael's killfile
by now...
That schmuck is already in my kill-file.
But please, can we let this thread die? Must we all lower ourselves to
the level of
quoth the Michael Schmarck:
My attitude? Well, maybe. But I rather think it has everything
to do with Alan, who made a bad comment.
Have you not noticed that you are the _only_ person upset by Alan's post? Why
don't you think about that for a bit
It was NOT me who started the fight.
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 31 March 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
So you found his post unhelpful,
You disagree? You think that he was helpful with his KDE comment?
I would be very surprised if he thought it was helpful. It wasn't
written to be helpful. It was
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 20:39:07 + (UTC), Michael Schmarck wrote:
I don't. I disagree with his most important point: It's no good
to post as much information as possible. Instead, the amount of
information posted should be condensed to only the important
pieces.
You have a problem to which
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 05:34:38 + (UTC), Michael Schmarck wrote:
You were not supposed to post such a comment in the first place.
Who dictates that? There is no list moderation except the self-moderation
of the users, an none of them have objected to light-hearted comments by
Alan, or other,
Neil Bothwick neil at digimed.co.uk writes:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 05:34:38 + (UTC), Michael Schmarck wrote:
You were not supposed to post such a comment in the first place.
Who dictates that?
I don't know. Ask Alan, as he tries to dictate which post are
allowed and which not.
Neil Bothwick neil at digimed.co.uk writes:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 20:39:07 + (UTC), Michael Schmarck wrote:
I don't. I disagree with his most important point: It's no good
to post as much information as possible. Instead, the amount of
information posted should be condensed to only
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:39:09 + (UTC), Michael Schmarck wrote:
You have a problem to which you do not know the solution, so how are
you supposed to know what is important and what is not?
As it seems, I knew what was not important. Just have a look at the
real root cause of the
On 30 Mar 2008, at 06:47, Michael Schmarck wrote:
...
In your world, an aggressor is doing nothing wrong? Do I understand
that right?
...
Get real.
When you're describing someone who has annoyed you on the Internet as
an aggressor it probably means you need to take a break for a while
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:32:47 +0100, Stroller wrote:
When you're describing someone who has annoyed you on the Internet as
an aggressor it probably means you need to take a break for a while
RFC 1: Count to ten before hitting send.
--
Neil Bothwick
Politics: Poli (many) - tics (blood
Hal Martin hal.martin at gmail.com writes:
Michael Schmarck wrote:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon at gmail.com wrote:
Now, onto your actual problem. It is exceptionally hard to even attempt
to provide a solution unless someone else fixed the exact same problem
before, as you have
Stroller stroller at stellar.eclipse.co.uk writes:
Hi there,
I, too, thought about saying something like this at the time. I'm
glad you have done so and I agree with all your points.
I don't. I disagree with his most important point: It's no good
to post as much information as possible.
On Saturday 29 March 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
I, too, know what it's like to receive a reply to one of my
questions which I find to be unhelpful and aggravating. However,
two wrongs don't make a right and no-one benefits from an angry
response.
Oh, so it's now my fault for
On 29 Mar 2008, at 20:39, Michael Schmarck wrote:
Stroller stroller at stellar.eclipse.co.uk writes:
I, too, thought about saying something like this at the time. I'm
glad you have done so and I agree with all your points.
I don't. I disagree with his most important point...
Yes, but
Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon at gmail.com writes:
On Saturday 29 March 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
I, too, know what it's like to receive a reply to one of my
questions which I find to be unhelpful and aggravating. However,
two wrongs don't make a right and no-one benefits from an
Stroller stroller at stellar.eclipse.co.uk writes:
On 29 Mar 2008, at 20:39, Michael Schmarck wrote:
Stroller stroller at stellar.eclipse.co.uk writes:
I, too, thought about saying something like this at the time. I'm
glad you have done so and I agree with all your points.
I don't. I
Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon at gmail.com writes:
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
Good evening!
I've got a problem with media-sound/rhythmbox-0.11.2-r1 on
my new ~x86 system. When I play an MP3 file, I see that rb
progresses and when I turn on visualization, I see
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
I'll crawl back into my KDE and e17 fanboy
clubhouse and shut up now.
It would've been better if you would've just shut up right
from the beginning - or simply post helpful comments. The
latter would be the preferred option, as far as I'm
22 matches
Mail list logo
