Am Dienstag, 7. April 2020, 01:38:01 CEST schrieb Michael:
> On Monday, 6 April 2020 22:15:20 BST Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 22:02:04 +0100, antlists wrote:
> > > > This isn't strictly true, the ESP must be vfat, but you can still
> > > > have an ext? /boot.
> > >
> > > This isn't
On 7/4/20 5:15 am, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 22:02:04 +0100, antlists wrote:
This isn't strictly true, the ESP must be vfat, but you can still
have an ext? /boot.
This isn't true at all - you've got the cart before the horse. The
original (U)EFI spec comes from Sun, I believe,
On 07/04/2020 00:38, Michael wrote:
Perhaps older UEFI specifications allowed Mac-baked filesystems, or perhaps
Apple were/are doing their own thing. The current UEFI specification
*requires* a FAT 12/16/32 filesystem type on an ESP partition to boot an OS
image/bootloader from - see section
On Monday, 6 April 2020 22:15:20 BST Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 22:02:04 +0100, antlists wrote:
> > > This isn't strictly true, the ESP must be vfat, but you can still
> > > have an ext? /boot.
> >
> > This isn't true at all - you've got the cart before the horse. The
> > original
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 22:02:04 +0100, antlists wrote:
> > This isn't strictly true, the ESP must be vfat, but you can still
> > have an ext? /boot.
>
> This isn't true at all - you've got the cart before the horse. The
> original (U)EFI spec comes from Sun, I believe, with no vfat in sight.
>
>
On 05/04/2020 13:52, Neil Bothwick wrote:
This isn't strictly true, the ESP must be vfat, but you can still have an
ext? /boot.
This isn't true at all - you've got the cart before the horse. The
original (U)EFI spec comes from Sun, I believe, with no vfat in sight.
A standards-compliant
On Sunday, 5 April 2020 20:39:47 BST Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Apr 2020 19:08:24 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > I wonder, would there ever be any valid reason to have the E.S.P.\
> > > and /boot as different partitions ?
> >
> > I found I had to do so. I couldn't get Neil's prererred
On Sun, 05 Apr 2020 19:08:24 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > I wonder, would there ever be any valid reason to have the E.S.P.\
> > and /boot as different partitions ?
>
> I found I had to do so. I couldn't get Neil's prererred layout to work.
> I forget the details now, but I only managed to
On Sunday, 5 April 2020 13:56:55 BST Ashley Dixon wrote:
> I wonder, would there ever be any valid reason to have the E.S.P.\ and /boot
> as different partitions ?
I found I had to do so. I couldn't get Neil's prererred layout to work. I
forget the details now, but I only managed to build a
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 13:56:55 +0100, Ashley Dixon wrote:
> > This isn't strictly true, the ESP must be vfat, but you can still
> > have an ext? /boot. However, it generally makes sense to have the ESP
> > and /boot as the same partition, that's how I generally do it. either
> > way, the handbook
On Sunday, 5 April 2020 13:56:55 BST Ashley Dixon wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 01:52:52PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > This isn't strictly true, the ESP must be vfat, but you can still have an
> > ext? /boot. However, it generally makes sense to have the ESP and /boot
> > as the same
On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 01:52:52PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> This isn't strictly true, the ESP must be vfat, but you can still have an
> ext? /boot. However, it generally makes sense to have the ESP and /boot
> as the same partition, that's how I generally do it. either way, the
> handbook
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 10:28:50 +0100, Ashley Dixon wrote:
> > Here /boot changes from fat32 to ext2.
> > Since this is my first U/EFI system I am a little confused.
>
> Good morning Meino,
>
> For U.E.F.I., the boot partition (/dev/sda2) must be FAT32. In your
> fstab file, this is written as
On 04/05 10:46, Michael wrote:
> Hi Meino,
>
> On Sunday, 5 April 2020 09:17:41 BST tu...@posteo.de wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > a new morning... :)
> >
> > Being on the way to install/setup the base system (mostly getting
> > stage3 uptodate) I came accross kinda inconsistency -- or at least
> >
Hi Meino,
On Sunday, 5 April 2020 09:17:41 BST tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a new morning... :)
>
> Being on the way to install/setup the base system (mostly getting
> stage3 uptodate) I came accross kinda inconsistency -- or at least
> it looks like for me.
>
> The system uses a 3T
On Sunday, 5 April 2020 10:21:32 BST Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday, 4 April 2020 20:59:56 BST tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> > I have some problems to understand, whether I understood...
> >
> > In the german language the "'s are often used to express the
> >
> > opposite of what is written in
On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 10:17:41AM +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> Here /boot changes from fat32 to ext2.
> Since this is my first U/EFI system I am a little confused.
Good morning Meino,
For U.E.F.I., the boot partition (/dev/sda2) must be FAT32. In your fstab file,
this is written as (the
On Saturday, 4 April 2020 20:59:56 BST tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> I have some problems to understand, whether I understood...
>
> In the german language the "'s are often used to express the
> opposite of what is written in words. For example:
>
> What a "nice" weather it is...!
>
> will
On 04/04 03:56, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 4/4/20 11:34 AM, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hi,
>
> > I am currently preparing a new harddisc as home for my new Gentoo
> > system.
> >
> > Is it possible to recreate exactlu the same pool of
> > applications/programs/libraries etc..., which my
John Covici wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Apr 2020 14:33:21 -0400,
> Dale wrote:
>> Mark Knecht wrote:
>>> Your world file should do that for the Gentoo stuff, with limitations.
>>> It assumes you have nothing on the system that was created outside of
>>> normal portage/emerge. It would probably duplicate
On 4/4/20 11:34 AM, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I am currently preparing a new harddisc as home for my new Gentoo
system.
Is it possible to recreate exactlu the same pool of
applications/programs/libraries etc..., which my current system have -
in one go?
Baring cosmic influences, I
On Sat, 04 Apr 2020 14:33:21 -0400,
Dale wrote:
>
> Mark Knecht wrote:
> > Your world file should do that for the Gentoo stuff, with limitations.
> > It assumes you have nothing on the system that was created outside of
> > normal portage/emerge. It would probably duplicate the latest kernel
>
On 04/04 12:30, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:05 PM wrote:
> >
> > On 04/04 07:25, Ashley Dixon wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 07:34:59PM +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I am currently preparing a new harddisc as home for my new Gentoo
> > > >
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:05 PM wrote:
>
> On 04/04 07:25, Ashley Dixon wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 07:34:59PM +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am currently preparing a new harddisc as home for my new Gentoo
> > > system.
> > >
> > > Is it possible to recreate exactlu
On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 09:05:09PM +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> This gives me the chance to use a new set of cpuflags given by
> cpuid2cpuflags, too.
> (by the way: This command show far less flags than diplayed via the
> command 'lscpu'is cpuid2cpuflags uptodate?)
I assume it's
On 04/04 07:25, Ashley Dixon wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 07:34:59PM +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am currently preparing a new harddisc as home for my new Gentoo
> > system.
> >
> > Is it possible to recreate exactlu the same pool of
> > applications/programs/libraries
Meino,
I think as your question was posed, yes, copying the world file is
enough to get the applications into the chroot built and working. Your
command looks reasonable but I'll let someone who runs Gentoo these days
make suggestions for improvement on that. (I no longer run Gentoo much.
Just
Mark Knecht wrote:
> Your world file should do that for the Gentoo stuff, with limitations.
> It assumes you have nothing on the system that was created outside of
> normal portage/emerge. It would probably duplicate the latest kernel
> tree but wouldn't build it, and wouldn't copy old kernels
On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 07:34:59PM +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently preparing a new harddisc as home for my new Gentoo
> system.
>
> Is it possible to recreate exactlu the same pool of
> applications/programs/libraries etc..., which my current
> system have - in one go?
>
Hi Mark,
thank you for answering my question! :)
(only to check whether I have understood correctlu)
Stuff I build outside of emerge/portage should not be in the
world-file...correct?
I will transfer the kernel related stuff from my current system to
the new root (currenly chrooted).
Ah! By
Your world file should do that for the Gentoo stuff, with limitations. It
assumes you have nothing on the system that was created outside of normal
portage/emerge. It would probably duplicate the latest kernel tree but
wouldn't build it, and wouldn't copy old kernels that aren't in portage if
you
Hi,
I am currently preparing a new harddisc as home for my new Gentoo
system.
Is it possible to recreate exactlu the same pool of
applications/programs/libraries etc..., which my current
system have - in one go?
That is: Copy from the current system into
the chroot environment, fire up emerge,
32 matches
Mail list logo
