On Saturday 25 February 2006 07:37, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
that is the only change I remember at the moment (and which did not went
into the wiki).
Not true anymore :) I just added your changes to the wiki.
'your' is correct, because I 'stole' it from the
On Friday 24 February 2006 07:00, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Alexander Kirillov wrote:
If I got it right here's the link for those interested:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_speed_up_portage_with_cdb
Does this work with recent portage releases?
it stopped some weeks ago - but in the gentoo forums
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Friday 24 February 2006 07:00, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Alexander Kirillov wrote:
If I got it right here's the link for those interested:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_speed_up_portage_with_cdb
Does this work with recent portage releases?
it stopped some weeks
On Friday 24 February 2006 15:37, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Friday 24 February 2006 07:00, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Alexander Kirillov wrote:
If I got it right here's the link for those interested:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_speed_up_portage_with_cdb
Does
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
that is the only change I remember at the moment (and which did not went into
the wiki).
Not true anymore :) I just added your changes to the wiki.
Thanks a lot,
Alexander Skwar
--
Yow! I'm having a quadrophonic sensation of two winos alone in a steel mill!
--
On Thursday 23 February 2006 11:26, Alexander Kirillov wrote:
I already think Gentoo base system requirements are a bit heavy just
having python in there. (I'm trying to run gentoo on my WRT54G 1.1;
storage over nfs/nbd) It would be completely over-the-top to require
Modula 3 support as
BSD ports system may not be as complex as Gentoo's
and needs more attention to maintain port dependencies
but this abuse of make IS REAL FAST.
portage is REAL SLOW.
So you should install/use cdb, which makes the whole rsync/update process REAL
FAST.
If you sync regularly it's usually within
On Friday 24 February 2006 00:39, Alexander Kirillov wrote:
BSD ports system may not be as complex as Gentoo's
and needs more attention to maintain port dependencies
but this abuse of make IS REAL FAST.
portage is REAL SLOW.
So you should install/use cdb, which makes the whole
Alexander Kirillov wrote:
If I got it right here's the link for those interested:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_speed_up_portage_with_cdb
Does this work with recent portage releases?
Alexander Skwar
--
My pan plays down an unprecedented amount of our national debt.
George W. Bush
February 27,
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 18:38, Aniruddha Shankar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] CVSup vs Gentoo's Rsync':
That I can live with. It's the updating portage cache - especially the
long wait at 50% that drags.
Go ~ for portage, I don't experience such a delay.
--
Boyd
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 05:24 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 04:07, Ow Mun Heng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about '[gentoo-user] CVSup vs Gentoo's Rsync':
Anyone wants to comment??
I already think Gentoo base system requirements are a bit heavy just having
Anyone knows?? A google search found interesting details on cvsup.
(there's even the purported 50x increase in speed on a 56K
link)http://www.cvsup.org/cvsup6.html
Then I also found a link in one of GWM (Gentoo Weeky News all the way
back in 2002 -
On 2/21/06, Ow Mun Heng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
* Local changes will be preserved if you want them to, just like
anoncvs. Anyone who's ever had their package.mask file
overwritten by an emerge rsync will appreciate this feature.
[SNIP]
If you don't want loose
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 04:07, Ow Mun Heng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about '[gentoo-user] CVSup vs Gentoo's Rsync':
Anyone wants to comment??
I already think Gentoo base system requirements are a bit heavy just having
python in there. (I'm trying to run gentoo on my WRT54G 1.1; storage over
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
That said, it would be nice to do away with the building file list...
delay we have with rsync.
That I can live with. It's the updating portage cache - especially the
long wait at 50% that drags.
K
-BEGIN PGP
15 matches
Mail list logo
