In [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan McKinnon) writes:
On Friday 18 January 2008, Konstantinos Agouros wrote:
xt_tcpudp is the difference as it seems
verified it that was the problem. For whatever reason I forgot to
configure module autoloading into the kernel.
Perhaps you used an
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Konstantinos Agouros) writes:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan McKinnon) writes:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Konstantinos Agouros wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan McKinnon) writes:
Most likely he doesn't have the
On Friday 18 January 2008, Konstantinos Agouros wrote:
xt_tcpudp is the difference as it seems
verified it that was the problem. For whatever reason I forgot to
configure module autoloading into the kernel.
Perhaps you used an old .config and that option name has changed?
alan
--
Alan
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Etaoin Shrdlu) writes:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
nat needs the following config at least:
Networking - Networking Options - Network packet filtering framework
(Netfilter) - IP: Netfilter Configuration - Full NAT
and the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan McKinnon) writes:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Konstantinos Agouros wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan McKinnon) writes:
Most likely he doesn't have the correct module loaded int he kernel
As I said, the fact that iptables -L
On Sunday 13 January 2008, Konstantinos Agouros wrote:
Hi,
I have a box running vmware server where I need some DNAT rules to get
traffic from a vm to where it belongs. Inserting the rule
iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -s ... -d ... -p tcp --dport ... -j DNAT
--to-destination destaddr
gives
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 13 January 2008, Konstantinos Agouros wrote:
Hi,
I have a box running vmware server where I need some DNAT rules to
get traffic from a vm to where it belongs. Inserting the rule
iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -s ... -d ... -p tcp
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan McKinnon) writes:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 13 January 2008, Konstantinos Agouros wrote:
Hi,
I have a box running vmware server where I need some DNAT rules to
get traffic from a vm to where it belongs. Inserting the
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Konstantinos Agouros wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan McKinnon) writes:
Most likely he doesn't have the correct module loaded int he kernel
As I said, the fact that iptables -L (after a fresh reboot) does not
do anything puzzles me a bit.
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
nat needs the following config at least:
Networking - Networking Options - Network packet filtering framework
(Netfilter) - IP: Netfilter Configuration - Full NAT
and the options below it
I guess it also needs some kind of connection
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Iliev) writes:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:01:04 + (UTC)
Konstantinos Agouros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
=20
I have a box running vmware server where I need some DNAT rules to get
traffic from a vm to where it belongs. Inserting the rule
Hi,
I have a box running vmware server where I need some DNAT rules to get
traffic from a vm to where it belongs. Inserting the rule
iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -s ... -d ... -p tcp --dport ... -j DNAT
--to-destination destaddr
gives me:
iptables: No chain/target/match by that name
Also I
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:01:04 + (UTC)
Konstantinos Agouros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a box running vmware server where I need some DNAT rules to get
traffic from a vm to where it belongs. Inserting the rule
iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -s ... -d ... -p tcp --dport ... -j
DNAT
13 matches
Mail list logo
