Re: [gentoo-user] GCC compilation disk space

2008-10-08 Thread Paul Hartman
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:34 AM, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 08 October 2008 09:35:25 Heiko Wundram wrote: >> Am Wednesday 08 October 2008 06:50:47 schrieb Willie Wong: >> > I don't remember gcc-3 being such a resource hog when building. So I >> > wonder: is this the

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC compilation disk space

2008-10-08 Thread Willie Wong
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 10:34:52AM +0200, Penguin Lover Alan McKinnon squawked: > > Expected behaviour. >=gcc-4.2 compiles about three times longer than > > > minutes; the current one takes about 1.5 hours), and requires loads of > > disk. > > gcc is getting like ooO :-) > Any idea why? Turns

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC compilation disk space

2008-10-08 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 08 October 2008 09:35:25 Heiko Wundram wrote: > Am Wednesday 08 October 2008 06:50:47 schrieb Willie Wong: > > I don't remember gcc-3 being such a resource hog when building. So I > > wonder: is this the expected behaviour or is something wrong with my > > box? > > Expected behav

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC compilation disk space

2008-10-08 Thread Heiko Wundram
Am Wednesday 08 October 2008 06:50:47 schrieb Willie Wong: > I don't remember gcc-3 being such a resource hog when building. So I > wonder: is this the expected behaviour or is something wrong with my > box? Expected behaviour. >=gcc-4.2 compiles about three times longer than

[gentoo-user] GCC compilation disk space

2008-10-07 Thread Willie Wong
Hi list: Is it me or does gcc take more disk space to compile now? I am trying to upgrade to gcc-4.3.2, and the compile stopped become it ran out of disk space--after eating up ~700 MB in /var/tmp. I seem to recall running into the same problem with the 4.3.1-r1 that I have installed a